Victorian Gray
Lifer
Daesh does of course, just for starters.
I've worked with many Muslims in the past, who were good people.
I get the impression you might not even know any.
He read some scary propaganda on the internet and is now an expert.
Daesh does of course, just for starters.
I've worked with many Muslims in the past, who were good people.
I get the impression you might not even know any.
He read some scary propaganda on the internet and is now an expert.
I've worked with many Muslims in the past, who were good people.
If you agree with tynopik, it just reinforces how far out you are to begin with to me.
And you are so smart sitting there ignoring everything. Your president won't even identify the enemy for what they are.
You can believe what you want, but things are getting worst.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5e8PCKVVxcE
And you are so smart sitting there ignoring everything. Your president won't even identify the enemy for what they are.
You can believe what you want, but things are getting worst.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5e8PCKVVxcE
I've never understood the propensity of many of the progressive/left people and politicians rushing to defending and play apologist for a reactionary, conservative to the point of being Medieval, misogynistic, homophobic religion and the often violent culture it spawned. Islam the antithesis of everything a liberal Western democracy holds dear. Yes, yes, not all Muslims are of that bent. Whatever.
I've never understood the propensity of many of the progressive/left people and politicians rushing to defending and play apologist for a reactionary, conservative to the point of being Medieval, misogynistic, homophobic religion and the often violent culture it spawned. Islam the antithesis of everything a liberal Western democracy holds dear. Yes, yes, not all Muslims are of that bent. Whatever.
Well, another poster here put it best:
Conservatives are vehemently against generalization when it concerns themselves. But it's entirely ok to generalize "most Mexicans" or "most Muslims" as criminals/rapists/terrorists?
Whatever indeed... Selective indignation is very selective...
I've never understood the propensity of many of the progressive/left people and politicians rushing to defending and play apologist for a reactionary, conservative to the point of being Medieval, misogynistic, homophobic religion and the often violent culture it spawned. Islam the antithesis of everything a liberal Western democracy holds dear. Yes, yes, not all Muslims are of that bent. Whatever.
Says the guy who apparently thinks it's ok to make generalizations about countries...
but, but, but the ODDZ!!!!
Because we understand that not all of them are like that? Is this all that confusing for you to understand?
Not all, but too many. 25% of them think targeting civilians in terror attacks can be justified.
I see no reason to allow such a group in the country
Trying to scapegoat Muslims is;
1) Wrong
2) Useless
1) is self-evident.
As to 2), how are you going to determine who is Muslim, once you create an environment where Muslims do not feel free to live their lives as Muslims and decide to act non-Muslim (whatever that might be)? Spanish Inquisition?
Not all, but too many. 25% of them think targeting civilians in terror attacks can be justified.
I see no reason to allow such a group in the country
Trump came out and stated plainly that he wanted to take out the families of terrorists.
Did his supporters bat an eye at that notion? And how many are their numbers...
And you say otherwise, thanks for clearing that one up...
Bottom line is, Islam has a problem with violence.
Trying to scapegoat Muslims is;
1) Wrong
2) Useless
1) is self-evident. As to 2), how are you going to determine who is Muslim, once you create an environment where Muslims do not feel free to live their lives as Muslims and decide to act non-Muslim (whatever that might be)? Spanish Inquisition?
America has a problem with violence, and it's happening every day across the country, how can we address that?
Not letting in people who are even more violent would be a good start . . .
Trump came out and stated plainly that he wanted to take out the families of terrorists.
Did his supporters bat an eye at that notion? And how many are their numbers...
He said he didn't mean 'kill'
what did he mean? who knows, but he's plainly said he does not support killing the families of terrorists, so, whatever
So by not letting in people who are potentially violent will cure the problems we have already with violence in this country?