How is Angry Birds possibly entertaining?

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

fustercluck

Diamond Member
Dec 29, 2002
7,402
0
71
It's for people who've never played video games in their life because their parents were nazis (or possibly a more lighthearted reason like they wanted them to focus on education more. Like i said, Nazis). There's a lot of people out there who never got into video games, youd be surprised. Now they're so easily accessible and easy to learn/play on their phones it's getting those people interested and they think it's the best thing since sliced cantaloupe.
 

QueBert

Lifer
Jan 6, 2002
23,019
1,205
126
Except that nearly every game you can play on Android you can also play on iOS and vice versa.

Fucking retard

I believe he was trolling, nobody would say gaming on the Android's better than iOS. I mean this thread's about a game that runs at a solid 60 fps on an iPhone and 30 on an Android device.
 

Dumac

Diamond Member
Dec 31, 2005
9,391
1
0
Yeah, Angry Birds is a hit for people who have never been into gaming before. They don't realize how derivative the game is, and they haven't played 123913920 iterations of the same game throughout their life.

Plus, Angry Birds has a decent art direction.

I would never pay for it though. It is really easy, and can be beaten completely really quickly. It didn't last me long.

Not to mention the game itself could do some work. I've encountered more bugs than usual for a non-PC title. If you are running with such a simple concept, your execution should be flawless.
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Yeah, Angry Birds is a hit for people who have never been into gaming before. They don't realize how derivative the game is, and they haven't played 123913920 iterations of the same game throughout their life.

Plus, Angry Birds has a decent art direction.

I would never pay for it though. It is really easy, and can be beaten completely really quickly. It didn't last me long.

Not to mention the game itself could do some work. I've encountered more bugs than usual for a non-PC title. If you are running with such a simple concept, your execution should be flawless.

Easy? It's incredibly difficult. I played RIO for 4 hours yesterday (and I had already beaten all the levels). One level was a good 1 hour. Beating the levels is easy, getting 3 stars in EVERY level is tough and requires extremely precise shots and thinking.

The goal of the game is to get 3 stars, not just beat the level. I don't know how many times I have to say this.

And never pay for it? It's a freaking dollar.

I think the angry bird hate is yet another example of "oh, this is popular therefore I must hate it!"
 

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,667
6,552
126
Easy? It's incredibly difficult. I played RIO for 4 hours yesterday (and I had already beaten all the levels). One level was a good 1 hour. Beating the levels is easy, getting 3 stars in EVERY level is tough and requires extremely precise shots and thinking.

The goal of the game is to get 3 stars, not just beat the level. I don't know how many times I have to say this.

And never pay for it? It's a freaking dollar.

I think the angry bird hate is yet another example of "oh, this is popular therefore I must hate it!"

that is exactly what it is, and i wouldn't expect anything less from the ATOT crowd not liking it because this place is extremely "anti-anything popular".

oh and i am a "real/hardcore gamer" and love angry birds.
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
100,754
18,045
126
Easy? It's incredibly difficult. I played RIO for 4 hours yesterday (and I had already beaten all the levels). One level was a good 1 hour. Beating the levels is easy, getting 3 stars in EVERY level is tough and requires extremely precise shots and thinking.

The goal of the game is to get 3 stars, not just beat the level. I don't know how many times I have to say this.

And never pay for it? It's a freaking dollar.

I think the angry bird hate is yet another example of "oh, this is popular therefore I must hate it!"

You don't think it is possible for someone to have a different opinion than you?
 

Zen0

Senior member
Jan 30, 2011
980
0
0
Easy? It's incredibly difficult. I played RIO for 4 hours yesterday (and I had already beaten all the levels). One level was a good 1 hour. Beating the levels is easy, getting 3 stars in EVERY level is tough and requires extremely precise shots and thinking.

The goal of the game is to get 3 stars, not just beat the level. I don't know how many times I have to say this.

And never pay for it? It's a freaking dollar.

I think the angry bird hate is yet another example of "oh, this is popular therefore I must hate it!"

So I own Apple products because it is so cool and everyone wants to be popular, and then I hate Angry Birds because it is popular therefore I must hate it?

The reality of the situation is that Angry Birds is juvenile while most of us buy the Apples for the quality components.
 

tokie

Golden Member
Jun 1, 2006
1,491
0
0
It's a silly game.

I lost major interest in video games several years ago. The only thing I play now is BFBC2 and SC2, which are remnants from my love of SC/WC and BF back in the day on the PC.

It seems to me that video games being churned out today are generally shit, so it doesn't surprise me that Angry Birds is popular.
 

oogabooga

Diamond Member
Jan 14, 2003
7,806
3
81
that is exactly what it is, and i wouldn't expect anything less from the ATOT crowd not liking it because this place is extremely "anti-anything popular".

oh and i am a "real/hardcore gamer" and love angry birds.

I didn't get the hype. I played on my friends evo 4g and i was pretty surprised at how intuitive and easy it was to play. And how quickly the difficulty could scale (if you're going for 3 stars, and in some cases even if you're not). We played the first level over and over again just trying to top each others high scores. He admits he plays quite a bit more than he thought he would and I could see why. My phone sucks so I don't really have any interest in playing now but would if I could probably.

On a side note: I think sometimes I hang out on ATOT still just to feel like a non-jaded optimist. In reality, I'm a pretty cynical hater, but compared to some on ATOT I'm a hippie and it feels kinda nice.
 

sunzt

Diamond Member
Nov 27, 2003
3,076
3
81
http://www.cnbc.com/id/43002827

Angry Birds CEO Plots Media Empire

Rovio CEO Mikael Hed told CNBC.com he wants to use the extraordinary success of the Angry Birds mobile game to build a diversified entertainment franchise spanning all media.

Released in December 2009, Angry Birds has been the runaway leader on Apple’s [AAPL 337.4964 -3.0036 (-0.88%) ] app store and on other platforms.

By March 2011 it passed 100 million downloads, had a popular movie tie-in with 20th Century Fox’s children’s film Rio and had demonstrated its ability to transition to desktop computers by selling 150,000 copies on Apple’s Mac App Store in its first week.

Angry Birds iPhone app
Source: Apple
Angry Birds iPhone app

The game, which has users flinging ball-shaped birds at green pigs, is kept fresh with seasonally-themed versions and has proved itself to be both startlingly addictive and capable of extending its run well beyond what would normally qualify it as a fad.

Some estimates put its total usage at 200 million minutes per day.

It is this staying power and loyalty that convinced Hed that Angry Birds can become the platform that makes Rovio, based just outside of Helsinki, Finland, into a global entertainment company.

“When we realized we had a big hit on our hands with Angry Birds, we looked at companies that had gone before us, especially in the mobile gaming sector where we were at that time very firmly,” Hed told CNBC.com.

“We saw that most gaming companies had then immediately tried to make another hit game and we realized that had very rarely worked. Rather, we started to look at what we could do around Angry Birds and if there was a way that we could build this into an entertainment franchise,” he added.

One-Hit Wonder?

Rovio’s critics have said that the company is simply a one-hit wonder, and that to genuinely demonstrate its ability to become a force in the market it will need to expand its range of games.

“Games are what we are very strong at, and we will do other games besides Angry Birds as well, but now as we are executing our media company strategy, we’re not in a tremendous hurry to churn out game after game after game,” Hed said.

After all, Rovio had produced more than 50 titles before hitting gold with Angry Birds. Taking their existing hit and using its popularity to expand horizontally into film, TV and merchandising is a way to grow the company in a rapid and controlled way, without having to rely on the hit-and-miss nature of online gaming success.

Even so, the company’s beginnings in social gaming and interactivity have given it an experience that others are going to struggle to match, Hed said.

“We have our own online retail presence as well, because that’s where our game is, and it gives us some really interesting opportunities as we do have a great channel to communicate with our fans through the game," he said.

"It does require adaptation from us constantly and learning about how these business areas work, but it gives us opportunities that would not be possible for other media companies because of the uniquely interactive nature of these mobile applications,” Hed added.

RELATED LINKS

Angry Birds Developer Eyes IPO in 3-4 Years
Zynga Buys iPhone Game Engine Development Team
Angry Birds and a Happy Box Office

Likewise, he said that his business has an advantage over traditional computer game companies, as the sheer volume of users shows.

“There is room for many kinds of games and there are different types of players too who prefer different types of games," Hed explained.

"Angry Birds is really popular amongst casual gamers,” he said. “Our audience seems to be the widest audience out there, the others are quite niche. So the question is can these other companies compete with the very broad demographic of Angry Birds?”

Aggressive Expansion Plans

Hed has aggressive expansion plans for Rovio, and said that the company will consider making acquisitions in the more traditional media space in order to advance its strategy. He anticipates that in a year’s time it will have increased in headcount by three to four times its current level of 100 employees.

While he is in no hurry to exit, Hed has previously said that he would consider an IPO down the line. Valuations of social media and gaming companies are currently running high – Zynga, the creator of Facebook games Cityville and Farmville, which is rumored to be planning a flotation in 2012, is being pitched at upwards of $9 billion.

At Wedbush Morgan, analyst Lou Kerner warns investors not to underestimate the value of social gaming, despite those who dismiss the soaring price tags as another dotcom-style bubble.

“Angry Birds is a global phenomenon that is likely going to continue for many years to come in many different variations. And while the average revenue per user is low, the cost of additional users is significantly lower than video games. They can achieve massive scale very quickly,” Kerner told CNBC.com.

“Cityville got to 100 million users in seven weeks. That’s not possible in the world of video games. So you’re looking at much larger user bases at a much lower cost. Even though they might monetize at a lower rate they can still be massively valued companies like Zynga,” he added.

Many commentators even said that Facebook was overvalued at $1 billion, simply “because $1 billion is a big number,” Kerner said.

“The opportunity today I think is unparalleled in the history of gaming to build profitable companies of significant scale. That’s what’s underappreciated broadly. When Zynga was trading at $1 billion, people said it was overvalued. It was overvalued at $2 billion and it was overvalued at $5 billion and overvalued at $8 billion. So why is it overvalued?”
 

Dumac

Diamond Member
Dec 31, 2005
9,391
1
0
Easy? It's incredibly difficult. I played RIO for 4 hours yesterday (and I had already beaten all the levels). One level was a good 1 hour. Beating the levels is easy, getting 3 stars in EVERY level is tough and requires extremely precise shots and thinking.

The goal of the game is to get 3 stars, not just beat the level. I don't know how many times I have to say this.

And never pay for it? It's a freaking dollar.

I think the angry bird hate is yet another example of "oh, this is popular therefore I must hate it!"

I got 3 stars on every level, and all the golden egg levels. Of course this is what I meant when I said "beaten completely". It wasn't really difficult.

And no, I would pay for it because I can find games that are just as good if not better for free in many other places. Plus, I got it for free on android and PC (albeit with ads).

It doesn't have anything to do with being popular. There really aren't any good mobile titles in my opinion, popular or not popular. The ones I enjoy the most are just GBA and SNES emulators...but that doesn't really count.

Everyone doesn't have to have the same opinion as you. ;)
 

cheezy321

Diamond Member
Dec 31, 2003
6,218
2
0
I didn't get the hype. I played on my friends evo 4g and i was pretty surprised at how intuitive and easy it was to play. And how quickly the difficulty could scale (if you're going for 3 stars, and in some cases even if you're not). We played the first level over and over again just trying to top each others high scores. He admits he plays quite a bit more than he thought he would and I could see why. My phone sucks so I don't really have any interest in playing now but would if I could probably.

On a side note: I think sometimes I hang out on ATOT still just to feel like a non-jaded optimist. In reality, I'm a pretty cynical hater, but compared to some on ATOT I'm a hippie and it feels kinda nice.

This is so true. ATOT makes me feel pretty good about my views on the world. A lot of cynical haters on this site.
 

fustercluck

Diamond Member
Dec 29, 2002
7,402
0
71
True, as far as games go it's not too shabby. I still think my post earlier is true but doesn't mean it's a bad game. It does suffer from the "It's popular so i must hate it" trend but it's a good time killing game.
 

NFS4

No Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
72,636
47
91
I disagree. Black is by far the most powerful, then yellow, then white

What about the BIG red bird? That mofo carries a lot of momentum.

That being said, I've already beat the latest Angry Birds Rio Beach Update -- 3 stars and all hidden fruit found of course :)
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
What about the BIG red bird? That mofo carries a lot of momentum.

That being said, I've already beat the latest Angry Birds Rio Beach Update -- 3 stars and all hidden fruit found of course :)

That must have taken a lot of time. Some of those levels are damn near impossible to 3 start. What's your estimated time to totally beat it?
 

Macamus Prime

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2011
3,108
0
0
This is a serious question, but I suppose I am wondering how anyone manages to be entertained by Angry Birds for more than a minute?

So far, I haven't found a single iOS "game" worth actually devoting time to.

The worst part of it all; you are forced to play it.

Did the Angry Birds developers break most or all of your fingers? I chickened out when I saw them murder the family next door.
 

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,667
6,552
126
What about the BIG red bird? That mofo carries a lot of momentum.

That being said, I've already beat the latest Angry Birds Rio Beach Update -- 3 stars and all hidden fruit found of course :)

there are like 2-3 of them that are a total bitch and i really can't figure it out. trying to not search google for the solution too...
 

holytechie

Junior Member
May 26, 2011
3
0
0
Its true that most people playing angry birds are those who dont have a ps3 or xbox. However, there are two other secrets for Angry Birds massive success, one is the addictive nature of achievements and constant updates, which is no more than another layer of graphics. Second is the amazing marketing aroung this game. Besides the angry birds chrome dimension levels are online and millions are playing it. There are several games very similar to angry birds, including crush the castle.
 
Last edited:

BUTCH1

Lifer
Jul 15, 2000
20,433
1,769
126
The two games I play on the shitter are way deeper than Angry Birds.

I dunno, shitter + Angry birds go awful well..Oh, and to all those who claim 3 stars on every level of every game, (Rio, AB, AB seasons) I'm calling shens unless someone posts some screenshots!!..
 

QueBert

Lifer
Jan 6, 2002
23,019
1,205
126
I dunno, shitter + Angry birds go awful well..Oh, and to all those who claim 3 stars on every level of every game, (Rio, AB, AB seasons) I'm calling shens unless someone posts some screenshots!!..

Eaisly doable if you have the time to replay a lot of the levels in upwards of 200 times. Anyone who claims they got 3 stars on every Angry Bird level for every game. If it's true, I'm not impressed they did it, but impressed they spent probably 5 hours on certain single levels to pull it off. If anyone put 4 hours a day into AB for a few months they could get 3 stars on all the levels
 

FoBoT

No Lifer
Apr 30, 2001
63,084
15
81
fobot.com
and don't forget , Angry Birds is coming to Facebook this Tuesday so you can 'share' your scores etc :awe:
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
if you watch the youtube videos that show you exactly how to do the level , it should be less than that, even :awe:

There are only a few levels I spent more than 10 minutes on to 3 star.

But I have 3 starred every level in all the games. Now working on getting freathers in every one. That can be even tougher.