• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

How Insurers Are Hiding Obamacare Benefits From Customers

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
174
106
You've made that assertion repeatedly w/o supporting documentation of any kind.

Right now, it's just an example of Truthiness, of you believing it to be true because you want to. It's an argument based on thin air.

When an insurance co gets a bill they see as unreasonable, they negotiate. If the provider won't settle, the insurance co pays whatever they believe to be reasonable & the provider has to sue if they want more. They seldom do.

You might ask Sactoking.

But I had part ownership in a durable medical goods company (rents/sells things like oxygen tanks, wheelchairs etc. Just no drugs). My recollection is that we that knew in advance if we took certain insurance providers. That bit is handled up front, meaning customers ask us (or we ask them) before purchasing.

The rates for everything were already agreed to. I.e., we didn't have negotiations or threats of lawsuits with the insurance provider.

You don't have time in business to haggle over every damn purchase etc. It's hard enough as it is to reach an actual person over the phone, much less one that has the authority to approve fees/prices etc.

Fern
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,685
136
You might ask Sactoking.

But I had part ownership in a durable medical goods company (rents/sells things like oxygen tanks, wheelchairs etc. Just no drugs). My recollection is that we that knew in advance if we took certain insurance providers. That bit is handled up front, meaning customers ask us (or we ask them) before purchasing.

The rates for everything were already agreed to. I.e., we didn't have negotiations or threats of lawsuits with the insurance provider.

You don't have time in business to haggle over every damn purchase etc. It's hard enough as it is to reach an actual person over the phone, much less one that has the authority to approve fees/prices etc.

Fern

Overvolt's assertion remains bogus. Hospitals are required, by law, to treat & stabilize emergency room patients. That's covered under the ACA. Once that's done the patient is transferred to a suitable facility for appropriate care dependent on a variety of factors. It's not like the hospital in Gillette, Wyoming is going to overcharge for a heart transplant- they don't have the staff or the facilities in the first place.
 

OverVolt

Lifer
Aug 31, 2002
14,278
89
91
You've made that assertion repeatedly w/o supporting documentation of any kind.

Right now, it's just an example of Truthiness, of you believing it to be true because you want to. It's an argument based on thin air.

When an insurance co gets a bill they see as unreasonable, they negotiate. If the provider won't settle, the insurance co pays whatever they believe to be reasonable & the provider has to sue if they want more. They seldom do.

If the insurance companies are so good at negotiating then why does medicare get better rates?
 

sactoking

Diamond Member
Sep 24, 2007
7,648
2,924
136
You've made that assertion repeatedly w/o supporting documentation of any kind.

Right now, it's just an example of Truthiness, of you believing it to be true because you want to. It's an argument based on thin air.

When an insurance co gets a bill they see as unreasonable, they negotiate. If the provider won't settle, the insurance co pays whatever they believe to be reasonable & the provider has to sue if they want more. They seldom do.

Overvolt's assertion remains bogus. Hospitals are required, by law, to treat & stabilize emergency room patients. That's covered under the ACA. Once that's done the patient is transferred to a suitable facility for appropriate care dependent on a variety of factors. It's not like the hospital in Gillette, Wyoming is going to overcharge for a heart transplant- they don't have the staff or the facilities in the first place.

I'm hesitant to step into the middle of this... but can I say that you're both not really right?

Overvolt isn't right that insurers have no ability to negotiate, in fact they have quite a bit of ability to negotiate before the fact. We hear complaints all the time from medical providers who want to be in a network but who refuse to accept the insurer's reimbursement rates. They want us to force the insurer to sign a contract with them at their named price. We're not an "any willing provider" state, so we don't do that. But, if the insurers had no ability to negotiate then it wouldn't even be an issue (from the providers' perspective).

At the same time, insurers don't have the ability to negotiate that you think they do. From an insurer's perspective the provider is either in network or out of network. If they're in network the insurer pays the pre-negotiated rate. If they're out of network the insurer pays the usual and customary rate (which, coincidentally, is close to or the same at the in-network pre-negotiated rate...). If a provider is out of network the insurer won't negotiate with them and their only recourse will be to balance bill the patient (in states that permit balance billing).

With that said, neither are hospitals bargain bastions. Hospitals can and do gouge customers at every opportunity. Anecdotally:

One hospital near me is the dedicated regional trauma center. If you go to that ER by ambulance (ground or air) they charge you $2,000 automatically for a "Green Trauma Team." The charge is incurred regardless of whether you are brought in as trauma or not. You cannot negotiate out of it and the courts will not intervene, it is legalized extortion.

The hospital closest to me was just recently named the "Most Expensive Hospital in America." If I go there for a non-trauma ER visit or some procedure that requires an in-patient stay I know I'm going to get ass-reamed.

We have lots of rural communities that are underserved medically. In one of them the only doctors that perform colonoscopies do so at the local hospital. It costs over $3,000. If you drive a couple of hours to a major city you can have the same procedure done for $800.

Moral of the story: nothing is ever black or white, it's all shades of gray (and a hell of a lot more than 50 of them).
 

Wreckem

Diamond Member
Sep 23, 2006
9,547
1,127
126
Tell me why hospitals are opting out of insurance from the exchanges?

None of the top 18 hospitals in the country have opted out of insurance on the exchanges. Every one of them has at least one exchange plan they are on.

Furthermore, every single county hospital in the United States will be accepting exchange plans, as are the OVERWHELMING MAJORITY OF HOSPITALS. Some are even planning on paying the premiums for their chronically ill.

There may be some hospitals that are completely opting out of exchange plans, but they are incredibly few in number. Its wholly dishonest to say "if you can even find a hospital that takes it" when hospitals that take exchange insurance far and away are the majority, overwhelming majority. Not even close. End of story.

This is not any different than with employer provided coverage. Eg. You have a long time Dr, you switch jobs and your Dr isn't on your plan with the new job. Happens all the time. If every Dr/Hospital in a region accepted all insurance plans offered in that region we wouldn't have most of the problems with out of network coverage. Fact of the matter is Drs and Hospitals have never accepted any/every insurance plan in an area. It is not surprising they don't accept all exchange insurance plans either.
 
Last edited:

gus6464

Golden Member
Nov 10, 2005
1,848
32
91
Man some states are getting shafted in the exchange. CA has a lot of providers in their exchange.

The premium at my wife's company that covers both of us isn't going up for next year and our coverage is really good and not very expensive at all. But she does work for an European company so maybe that has something to do with it.
 

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
80,287
17,081
136
seinfeld-meme-generator-oh-really-now-7646be.jpg


Except the ACA limits how much profit health insurance companies can make.

They're still not gonna LOSE money, and that means jacking up the rates.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
37,373
33,012
136
So you believe it is a conspiracy against Obama then? Anyways...

http://www.forbes.com/sites/theapot...miums-by-avg-of-41-subsidies-flow-to-elderly/
Why would you even say that? There is nothing in my post that could even remotely be used to infer that. I believe it is a case of Republicans getting fucked by their own fear and hatred. Liberals who get a letter like that immediately question it and go to the exchanges to see if they have better options. Republicans just say "damn Obama fucking me again but it's what we all expected" and sign up for the expensive shitty plan because there's no way they are going to go to that fucking liberal socialist website and support that Obamacare thingy because it has to fail.
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
I'm hesitant to step into the middle of this... but can I say that you're both not really right?

Overvolt isn't right that insurers have no ability to negotiate, in fact they have quite a bit of ability to negotiate before the fact. We hear complaints all the time from medical providers who want to be in a network but who refuse to accept the insurer's reimbursement rates. They want us to force the insurer to sign a contract with them at their named price. We're not an "any willing provider" state, so we don't do that. But, if the insurers had no ability to negotiate then it wouldn't even be an issue (from the providers' perspective).

At the same time, insurers don't have the ability to negotiate that you think they do. From an insurer's perspective the provider is either in network or out of network. If they're in network the insurer pays the pre-negotiated rate. If they're out of network the insurer pays the usual and customary rate (which, coincidentally, is close to or the same at the in-network pre-negotiated rate...). If a provider is out of network the insurer won't negotiate with them and their only recourse will be to balance bill the patient (in states that permit balance billing).

With that said, neither are hospitals bargain bastions. Hospitals can and do gouge customers at every opportunity. Anecdotally:

One hospital near me is the dedicated regional trauma center. If you go to that ER by ambulance (ground or air) they charge you $2,000 automatically for a "Green Trauma Team." The charge is incurred regardless of whether you are brought in as trauma or not. You cannot negotiate out of it and the courts will not intervene, it is legalized extortion.

The hospital closest to me was just recently named the "Most Expensive Hospital in America." If I go there for a non-trauma ER visit or some procedure that requires an in-patient stay I know I'm going to get ass-reamed.

We have lots of rural communities that are underserved medically. In one of them the only doctors that perform colonoscopies do so at the local hospital. It costs over $3,000. If you drive a couple of hours to a major city you can have the same procedure done for $800.

Moral of the story: nothing is ever black or white, it's all shades of gray (and a hell of a lot more than 50 of them).
Well said, sir.

They're still not gonna LOSE money, and that means jacking up the rates.
They have to do that, to cover all the mandated free shit, new people, and new risks (i.e. mental health.)