might be cheaper/better to scrap it and build a new shipI can't wait to see the repair bill for this one. It's going to take months in dry dock to fix this mess.
The main engines are driven by 4 GE LM2500 gas turbines (2 per shaft). Depending on how hard the side impact the main shaft bearings could be damaged resulting in the shaft being bound up and not able to turn.
The main engines are driven by 4 GE LM2500 gas turbines (2 per shaft). Depending on how hard the side impact the main shaft bearings could be damaged resulting in the shaft being bound up and not able to turn.
might be cheaper/better to scrap it and build a new ship
Anyone remember what happened in Nova Scotia when a Norwegian ship collided with a French ship bringing explosives to the Western Front?
http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/the-great-halifax-explosion
Just saw on the news that damage under the waterline extended almost all the way to the keel. The admiral (didn't catch his name) said the damage under the water line was very extensive.
Which is why the enlisted berth was breached flooding and killing those 7 crewmembers who's names have been released. I really expect for them to be females as their berth is directly below the males.So now you should understand that there is a dent just below the waterline as large as the damage to superstructure.
Not going to read this whole thread but don't ships have like radar and sonar and shit? Maybe some collision detection software?Finally, something I can actually answer.
Its dark out at night, on the ocean.
And the running lights can surprisingly not be enough to see another ship. Sounds crazy but its true.
Also, the lookouts on both ships were probably napping or fucking off. I stood lookout. Its boring.
But if I got caught fucking off, I'd get the shit beat out of me.
So obviously, the Navy needs to bring back ass whoopins.
Also, was the weather bad?
Which is why the enlisted berth was breached flooding and killing those 7 crewmembers who's names have been released. I really expect for them to be females as their berth is directly below the males.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/17/us/missing-sailors-found/index.html
Not going to read this whole thread but don't ships have like radar and sonar and shit? Maybe some collision detection software?
What I read was that the Crystal initially turned to avoid hitting something (most likely the Fitzgerald), proceeded Eastward, then made the u-turn to find out what they hit.The massive cargo ship suddenly performed a u-turn. That is what probably was a major cause of the accident.
Ships take time to be steered round obstacles. So if the u-turn meant that a massive cargo ship was suddenly on a collision course with the destroyer, it may not have time to do much about it.
I get the part about taking a long time to change course. I do not buy for a second that these ships can't detect possible collisions in real time though.The massive cargo ship suddenly performed a u-turn. That is what probably was a major cause of the accident.
Ships take time to be steered round obstacles. So if the u-turn meant that a massive cargo ship was suddenly on a collision course with the destroyer, it may not have time to do much about it.
I'm having trouble linking the adverb "suddenly" to "massive cargo ship".The massive cargo ship suddenly performed a u-turn.
What I read was that the Crystal initially turned to avoid hitting something (most likely the Fitzgerald), proceeded Eastward, then made the u-turn to find out what they hit.
I get the part about taking a long time to change course. I do not buy for a second that these ships can't detect possible collisions in real time though.
I'm having trouble linking the adverb "suddenly" to "massive cargo ship".
Can't fix the Fitzgerald she's got a broken spin.
Just saw on the news that damage under the waterline extended almost all the way to the keel. The admiral (didn't catch his name) said the damage under the water line was very extensive.
Sad regardless of the sex of the sailors. They might have to rethink their berthing locations as the lower enlisted are all on the same side of the ship. I'm just an old leg so what do I know about ship building. I can tell you that the Arleigh Burke class was the first DD I've ever been aboard and I immediately noticed how the lower enlisted crew quarters were up against that side of the ship. I spoke to the crew as I moved about who informed me about bunking procedures which led me down to the female area beneath them which is also why I figured they'd make up the bulk of the casualties.All males.
Sad regardless of the sex of the sailors. They might have to rethink their berthing locations as the lower enlisted are all on the same side of the ship.
There really isn't enough time to try to move everyone out of their berth before the collision and might possible increase casualties as the bunks have straps to keep them from falling out. I'd be willing to bet that everyone was in their comfort zone and had lowered their guard which allowed this to happen. The guys who bunk against the hull probably died upon impact and the rest had to fight the pressurized seawater gushing through the hull to reach the stairs on the port side which they also share with the berth below them.Wouldn't it be more reasonable to pay attention, know the impact is imminent, and call everyone to move up above the death trap?