It's official, US to pay for wall.
![]()
he cannot do that til NAFTA is dealt with.
I'm reading that Nieto was elected with cartel money and if so it's no surprise that he's not going to cooperate in any way with efforts to enforce our borders.Now nothing. The peso tumbles and Trump continues doing exactly what he was doing. Cancelling the trip was a political decision, but it changes absolutely nothing.
infowars? brietbart? linky link.I'm reading that Nieto was elected with cartel money and if so it's no surprise that he's not going to cooperate in any way with efforts to enforce our borders.
I'm reading that Nieto was elected with cartel money and if so it's no surprise that he's not going to cooperate in any way with efforts to enforce our borders.
goddamn... what a bumbling, fumbling buffoon. We're only a week in and it's already a shitshow.What a dipshit, diplomacy by Twitter and he's still using his personal twitter account.
https://www.boston.com/news/politics/2017/01/26/mexico-stunned-by-trump-tweet-on-canceling-trip
I can only presume he means to unilaterally withdraw the US from NAFTA.
The idea that this can't be circumvented is interesting, if wrong. The money will just end up being funneled through 3rd party countries one way or another. Alternately they could simply mail the money to Mexico. This isn't going to work.
This idea that everything is negotiable is starting to run in to a brick wall. Mexico hates Trump and he backed the one guy who might have done some kind of deal into a corner for no reason other than to puff up his own ego. It doesn't seem Mexico thinks this is negotiable no matter how many times Trump says it is.
Political blustering aside, everything in reality is negotiable, the two sides simply have too much of an incentive to get it done.
No... I would rather have waited to post a link if and when it became more mainstream but then again, no link short of one from one of your faves would suffice anyway. It's also why I said, "if so".But you are afraid to post a link to where you are reading this info?
Again, you must not be familiar with OFAC and AML type processes. Sure, you can find ways around any restrictions, but that's just not going to happen for the vast majority of people who send money back home. Circumventing of the restrictions can and does happen, but it slows it to a trickle. Sure you can mail dollars in an envelope.... but do you really think that's going to happen on the same scale as electronic transfers, especially when you probably have a 50% chance of that money you mail disappearing in the process? You're basically arguing that putting a password on your WIFI and using WPA2 doesn't work because it can be broken. Sure it can, but for all practical purposes it does what you want it to do -- make it very difficult.
Political blustering aside, everything in reality is negotiable, the two sides simply have too much of an incentive to get it done.
Still has to follow the process. I think it's a quarter after triggering withdrawal then it becomes official.
Six month, not a quarter. Got it. I thought it was six month. But went with quarter cuz I remembered something from radio.Any party can withdraw on 6 months notice.
But the statutes that put NAFTA into place were enacted by acts of Congress. Unilaterally withdrawing without also withdrawing the provisions that made it law would be literally the worst trade deal ever.Any party can withdraw on 6 months notice.
But the statutes that put NAFTA into place were enacted by acts of Congress. Unilaterally withdrawing without also withdrawing the provisions that made it law would be literally the worst trade deal ever.
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-yoo-ku-trump-nafta-20161129-story.html
I'm sure none of them thought of the ramifications. Thought is in short supply in this administration.I didn't say it was a good idea, just possible. I'm sure he nor anybody around him has thought through the ramifications.
