Puffnstuff
Lifer
- Mar 9, 2005
- 16,255
- 4,928
- 136
The great wall of China is living proof that they work.Good thing it's not a military problem. Also, the Chinese and Romans would like a word with you about walls not being effective defenses![]()
The great wall of China is living proof that they work.Good thing it's not a military problem. Also, the Chinese and Romans would like a word with you about walls not being effective defenses![]()
Oh, I'm sure they will find ways around whatever mechanisms are put in place, just like a thief can find a way around any kind of security you have on your house. That doesn't mean you don't implement it and make it a heck of a lot harder. Just making it that much harder will put a tremendous squeeze on the totals.
lol, yes, head for your bunkers, doom and gloom! Last I saw, Mexico has a trade surplus of $60 billion per year in trading with the US. Mexico exports about $300 billion worth of goods to the US each year. You seriously think Mexico can afford to get into a trade war with the country with which it has a $60 billion trade surplus and that buys $300 billion worth of mexican goods each year? Really?
No matter what the politicians and talking heads say, I suspect the Mexicans have some pretty strong incentives just like we do to keep things going. Talk of trade war is baloney. The US has a lot at stake as well, but to call what's at stake for both parties equal is just delusional. The US has a lot of leverage, but it needs to decide how far it wants to push to use it.
All you would have to do is convince fskholspy that 67% of Mexican immigrants crossing the wall were going to vote Republican and he'd come up with half a dozen humane ways that they could be prevented from entering the U.S.Good luck enforcing without the data and other support the feds provide; enjoy setting up your own state and city level collection programs.
All you would have to do is convince fskholspy that 67% of Mexican immigrants crossing the wall were going to vote Republican and he'd come up with half a dozen humane ways that they could be prevented from entering the U.S.
The better question is: who is going to finance it?
Isn't this really just a reinstatement of Secure Fence Act of 2006?
Isn't this really just a reinstatement of Secure Fence Act of 2006?
The great wall of China is living proof that they work.
Sure, whatever you say. Since you're taking that position then surely you'll be fine when Trump's administration now longer "chooses to devote resources" to help enforce state laws. Like civil rights, voting rights, equal housing, etc. I like this plan already.
"We're not refusing to comply with state law, we're just not helping you enforce them."
well yea, it was totally effective to the tech of the day, that is, 476BC, has tech increased since then? Hmm.....LOL Really?
The existence of a wall is proof of the effectiveness of walls?
All you would have to do is convince fskholspy that 67% of Mexican immigrants crossing the wall were going to vote Republican and he'd come up with half a dozen humane ways that they could be prevented from entering the U.S.
I'm not sure why people keep using this analogy, it's a terrible one. Taxing or stopping money from going to Mexico will be somewhere between super hard or impossible. Creating yet another black market sure seems like a good idea.
Nieto's approval is at 12% last I looked thanks in no small part to his handling of Trump. Mexico's economy has already been hurt by Trump but people there don't seem to be rolling over, quite the contrary. If his government collapses he'll be replaced with some left wing anti-American who will probably call Trump on his threat or worse. It's possible to overplay your hand and our illustrious president seems to be doing just that.
Super hard or impossible? Really? We do it already with lots of countries. You make regulations that govern financial transactions with a country. Apparently you aren't familiar with AML and OFAC type restrictions and regulations? Sure there are going to be lots of ways around it, but that's irrelevant. It will have a major impact, so it creates leverage.
Nieto is as good as gone, but that doesn't matter. You're making a LOT of assumptions about what will and won't happen with their politics and what they will do. The bottom line is that the impact of a trade war would be waaaaaaay more severe for Mexico than it would be for the US. It would also create even more problems with illegals for us (as well as losing trade benefits, jobs etc). So both sides have an incentive to figure it out, but we have more options and leverage.
well yea, it was totally effective to the tech of the day, that is, 476BC, has tech increased since then? Hmm.....
And are we going to gun down those who try to climb over, dig under, sail/fly over the wall? Just, like, shoot them, kill them?
It really worked for east berlin.
... You rally have no clue do you?The great wall of China is living proof that they work.
The great wall of China is living proof that they work.
well yea, it was totally effective to the tech of the day, that is, 476BC, has tech increased since then? Hmm.....
And are we going to gun down those who try to climb over, dig under, sail/fly over the wall? Just, like, shoot them, kill them?
It really worked for east berlin.
actually the Great Wall of China was pretty useless.
One less Mexican in America! The wall is already working.AP reporting that Nieto has canceled his trip to DC.
Future archaeologist: "As best we can determine, they built the massive 2000 mile long wall to attract foreigners."Yeah no. It did more for Chinese tourism than anything else. Perhaps we can build some attractions on The Wall to make foreign tourists.
One less Mexican in America! The wall is already working.![]()
Why not? It isn't as if they give a rats ass about our laws.They can't vote idiot.
