How do we block people from tunneling under our new wall?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,298
47,677
136
Oh, I'm sure they will find ways around whatever mechanisms are put in place, just like a thief can find a way around any kind of security you have on your house. That doesn't mean you don't implement it and make it a heck of a lot harder. Just making it that much harder will put a tremendous squeeze on the totals.

I'm not sure why people keep using this analogy, it's a terrible one. Taxing or stopping money from going to Mexico will be somewhere between super hard or impossible. Creating yet another black market sure seems like a good idea.


lol, yes, head for your bunkers, doom and gloom! Last I saw, Mexico has a trade surplus of $60 billion per year in trading with the US. Mexico exports about $300 billion worth of goods to the US each year. You seriously think Mexico can afford to get into a trade war with the country with which it has a $60 billion trade surplus and that buys $300 billion worth of mexican goods each year? Really?

No matter what the politicians and talking heads say, I suspect the Mexicans have some pretty strong incentives just like we do to keep things going. Talk of trade war is baloney. The US has a lot at stake as well, but to call what's at stake for both parties equal is just delusional. The US has a lot of leverage, but it needs to decide how far it wants to push to use it.

Nieto's approval is at 12% last I looked thanks in no small part to his handling of Trump. Mexico's economy has already been hurt by Trump but people there don't seem to be rolling over, quite the contrary. If his government collapses he'll be replaced with some left wing anti-American who will probably call Trump on his threat or worse. It's possible to overplay your hand and our illustrious president seems to be doing just that.
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,759
2,086
136
Good luck enforcing without the data and other support the feds provide; enjoy setting up your own state and city level collection programs.
All you would have to do is convince fskholspy that 67% of Mexican immigrants crossing the wall were going to vote Republican and he'd come up with half a dozen humane ways that they could be prevented from entering the U.S.
 

glenn1

Lifer
Sep 6, 2000
25,383
1,013
126
All you would have to do is convince fskholspy that 67% of Mexican immigrants crossing the wall were going to vote Republican and he'd come up with half a dozen humane ways that they could be prevented from entering the U.S.

He's actually the worst kind of person and citizen - someone who holds that a law is immoral and shouldn't be enforced but doesn't make any move to repeal the law. If he came out as open border I could least respect him since that's an honorable position to take, his current position of keeping the law but not enforcing it is abhorrent. There is really no middle ground on this and purposely leaving illegals in permanent jeopardy is a load of crap. Either legalize them all or deport them all I don't care, don't force them to stay in the shadows so big city folks can have their illegal nannies and red state farmers have slave labor to pick their crops. The current status quo is the worst possible position you could take and you should be ashamed if you vote this way.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,298
47,677
136
Isn't this really just a reinstatement of Secure Fence Act of 2006?

I haven't seen an assessment of what funds under that could be allocated but Ryan/McConnell were just on tv and said that it would require 12-15B. Ryan previously mentioned that a special funding vehicle would be needed.
 

feralkid

Lifer
Jan 28, 2002
16,939
5,037
136
Sure, whatever you say. Since you're taking that position then surely you'll be fine when Trump's administration now longer "chooses to devote resources" to help enforce state laws. Like civil rights, voting rights, equal housing, etc. I like this plan already.

"We're not refusing to comply with state law, we're just not helping you enforce them."


You should check out the Constitution one of these years; you probably won't learn much, though.
 
Feb 16, 2005
14,080
5,453
136
LOL Really?

The existence of a wall is proof of the effectiveness of walls?
well yea, it was totally effective to the tech of the day, that is, 476BC, has tech increased since then? Hmm.....
And are we going to gun down those who try to climb over, dig under, sail/fly over the wall? Just, like, shoot them, kill them?
It really worked for east berlin.
 

PokerGuy

Lifer
Jul 2, 2005
13,650
201
101
I'm not sure why people keep using this analogy, it's a terrible one. Taxing or stopping money from going to Mexico will be somewhere between super hard or impossible. Creating yet another black market sure seems like a good idea.

Super hard or impossible? Really? We do it already with lots of countries. You make regulations that govern financial transactions with a country. Apparently you aren't familiar with AML and OFAC type restrictions and regulations? Sure there are going to be lots of ways around it, but that's irrelevant. It will have a major impact, so it creates leverage.

Nieto's approval is at 12% last I looked thanks in no small part to his handling of Trump. Mexico's economy has already been hurt by Trump but people there don't seem to be rolling over, quite the contrary. If his government collapses he'll be replaced with some left wing anti-American who will probably call Trump on his threat or worse. It's possible to overplay your hand and our illustrious president seems to be doing just that.

Nieto is as good as gone, but that doesn't matter. You're making a LOT of assumptions about what will and won't happen with their politics and what they will do. The bottom line is that the impact of a trade war would be waaaaaaay more severe for Mexico than it would be for the US. It would also create even more problems with illegals for us (as well as losing trade benefits, jobs etc). So both sides have an incentive to figure it out, but we have more options and leverage.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,298
47,677
136
Super hard or impossible? Really? We do it already with lots of countries. You make regulations that govern financial transactions with a country. Apparently you aren't familiar with AML and OFAC type restrictions and regulations? Sure there are going to be lots of ways around it, but that's irrelevant. It will have a major impact, so it creates leverage.

Good luck getting other countries to abide by them.

Nieto is as good as gone, but that doesn't matter. You're making a LOT of assumptions about what will and won't happen with their politics and what they will do. The bottom line is that the impact of a trade war would be waaaaaaay more severe for Mexico than it would be for the US. It would also create even more problems with illegals for us (as well as losing trade benefits, jobs etc). So both sides have an incentive to figure it out, but we have more options and leverage.

Yes I'm sure some pro-Trump lackey who bends over for him is going to become president after he throughly embarrasses Nieto and pisses off most of Mexico. I'm not sure what world you're living in but please come join the rest of us.
 

Humpy

Diamond Member
Mar 3, 2011
4,464
596
126
well yea, it was totally effective to the tech of the day, that is, 476BC, has tech increased since then? Hmm.....
And are we going to gun down those who try to climb over, dig under, sail/fly over the wall? Just, like, shoot them, kill them?
It really worked for east berlin.

That is the strategic benefit of a wall, to slow people down for long enough that you can more easily shoot them.

The Great Wall was in large part a display of power (hmmm...) but had little effect when invaders simply went around it or had some of their homies open the gates.
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
100,919
18,092
126
well yea, it was totally effective to the tech of the day, that is, 476BC, has tech increased since then? Hmm.....
And are we going to gun down those who try to climb over, dig under, sail/fly over the wall? Just, like, shoot them, kill them?
It really worked for east berlin.

actually the Great Wall of China was pretty useless.
 

FelixDeCat

Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
31,155
2,749
126
actually the Great Wall of China was pretty useless.

Yeah no. It did more for Chinese tourism than anything else. Perhaps we can build some attractions on The Wall to make foreign tourists help pay for it.

We can sell T Shirts and MAGA caps at The Wall.
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
73,324
34,788
136
Yeah no. It did more for Chinese tourism than anything else. Perhaps we can build some attractions on The Wall to make foreign tourists.
Future archaeologist: "As best we can determine, they built the massive 2000 mile long wall to attract foreigners."
 

Grooveriding

Diamond Member
Dec 25, 2008
9,147
1,330
126
This should have been a clear sort of outcome with Trump. An insecure, sensitive and immature manchild will not be capable of diplomacy. He thinks if he swaggers his fat ass around in his lopsided suits and sends out threatening tweets that others will just capitulate.

He has no sense of dealing with other people and allowing them to negotiate and find compromise with a measure of respect afforded to both parties. The man is an unintelligent buffoon.

Good luck for Trump when he's in a trade war with multiple nations. Unedumacated Joe hoping for that upgrade from stocking shelves at the Piggly Wiggly to installing widgets at the reopened calculator plant is going to enjoy those higher prices on near everything.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.