Victorian Gray
Lifer
- Nov 25, 2013
- 32,083
- 11,718
- 136
Funny you ask how this will affect the little people and then immediately advocate entitlement reform.
Funny how all that "concern" *always* ends up there.
Funny you ask how this will affect the little people and then immediately advocate entitlement reform.
Military should be cut. If reforming = cuts, fuck you. If not, carry on.
I agree the military needs to be cut also big time. Reforms may equal cuts, that’s reality. SS needs to go back to its original purpose of being a safety net and not a 401k, introduce means testing, maybe push back retirement age etc. Medicare needs to be reformed to incentivize preventative care and getting more benefit for dollar spent, not fee for service etc. There’s plenty that can be done to make them more efficient.
Reform isnt a bad thing and is needed to make sure these services are sustainable over time.
If reform = cut, see my response above. I'm sick and fucking tired of the generation before mine wanting to keep all of theirs and cutting mine and the generation below mine at the same time cutting taxes for the wealthy. If McCain can get his full SS from age 65 and continues to get it, we can get ours in full.
I've never voted straight line ticket for anything but I agree with a co-worker, if any attempt is made to cut SS/Medicare, I'll vote straight line Democrat for the rest of my life, regardless if the candidate is satan, the Pope, Charlie Brown.
In your opinion are those programs sustainable in their current form? Not just sustainable in the short term so that your generation whatever it may be can get theirs out of it, but be there for your kids and grandkids also?
Maybe once the big lump of boomers gets through, possibly but until then, put more money into it, period. If that requires borrowing more money, so be it. We don't care to borrow more money to give a tax cut to mostly rich people, we can borrow money to get through the boomers without cutting benefits.
That seems like a pretty wreckless approach imo. It’s putting the the bill on future generations credit card (which is why I’m against the tax cuts) and just expecting our kids to simply pay up because we couldnt make the hard decisions, nevermind that it could compound the problems for them.
In your opinion are those programs sustainable in their current form? Not just sustainable in the short term so that your generation whatever it may be can get theirs out of it, but be there for your kids and grandkids also?
I missed voting in a special mayoral election in 1978 in the Los Angeles County municipality where I lived. I felt really crappy about it and haven't missed a vote, any vote, since then. Voting is easy to do, early voting is easily available and only in the deepest of blue enclaves does the waiting to vote time ever reach a fraud asking time of 7+ hours. Every year you see Democrats looking for a way, some way they can commit vote fraud on a grand scale to insure their victory. They're not satisfied with their old ways of fraudulent voting or getting the dead to vote or "Vote early, vote often"
Yes before we get to routine posters that try to claim there is no such thing as vote fraud.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/dead-people-voting-in-colorado/article/2602775
Then raise taxes on the rich, cut the military, etc. We can bail out banks, auto factories, etc. We can bail out SS/Medicare, one way or another, without cutting.
It's funny how many boomers paid a much lower rate than my generation (up until the 80's when FICA was raised) yet they get no cut offers. My generation and generations after have paid the higher rate our entire working lives and are getting a lower return for it via having to wait until we are older to get it and now the boomers, especially the assholes in CONgress say that we should be taking a cut, while preserving 100% for the boomers? Fuck that and anyone that suggests it, period.
http://www.milefoot.com/math/businessmath/taxes/fica.htm
Whoa, cowboy. Boomers were 19-37 years old in 1983 when FICA was raised. When called upon to pay it forward, we & GenXers have done so. Meanwhile, our seniors promoted trickle down capitalism with low taxes at the top to promote growth. It's become obvious that it won't trickle down on its own so we'll have to squeeze it out with taxes if we're to prosper. Time was when we did it in other ways with things like unions & regulations but those days are gone, leaving us only with taxes.
What was the margin in that last Virginia House election? Oh yes, it's tied. Fsk off, even 1 fraud vote matters.I like how the article you linked as proof voter fraud is a problem talks about how voter fraud isn’t a meaningful problem, hahaha.
Nice self ownage.
What was the margin in that last Virginia House election? Oh yes, it's tied. Fsk off, even 1 fraud vote matters.
I did read it and also dismissed the usual partisan claim that fraudulent votes "don't matter". There are plenty of elections in the United States where vote fraud could have been the difference between who lost and who won. Every time officials investigate vote fraud, they find it.Well the article you posted trying to convince us of that apparently disagrees. Lol.
My main question is if you were so stupid as to not read your own article before posting it or if you are so dishonest that you hoped we didn’t. Can you help clear that up?
SS needs to go back to its original purpose of being a safety net and not a 401k, introduce means testing, maybe push back retirement age e
Pretty much nobody in the boomer generation is being ask to take a cut (other than the few that had their ages pushed forward already). The cutoff age that was floated around was for GenX and newer generations, not anyone in the boomer range. Regardless, nobody should have to take a cut and I agree, taxes NEED to be raised to cover it since the top won't trickle it down with the LAUGHER curve and all.
It's also true that if people were age 19-37 when FICA was raised, many of the older part of boomers had indeed paid less than the newer generations who have paid the full rate their full lives.
P.S. I'm not advocating ANYBODY, including boomers get a cut. I'm advocating raising taxes on the wealthy, cutting the military, etc. to fund what was promised.
I did read it and also dismissed the usual partisan claim that fraudulent votes "don't matter". There are plenty of elections in the United States where vote fraud could have been the difference between who lost and who won. Every time officials investigate vote fraud, they find it.
You did realize that the actual story told about substantial vote fraud, only a Democrat OPINION piece claimed that it didn't really matter, please look the other way while the criminals are busy ......etc?
Yeah they found voter fraud in the Virginia House election. It was when they certified a spoiled ballot in order to make it a tie.What was the margin in that last Virginia House election? Oh yes, it's tied. Fsk off, even 1 fraud vote matters.
First cut revenue and then use budget restrictions as justification for a reduction in entitlements while the rich people are allowed to retain ever more wealth. Caring Democrats under FDR created the New Deal to prevent ordinary Americans from ever being completely exposed to financial ruin yet Republicans yearn to return us to those days in every way.Tax cuts and spending are two different things. How do tax cuts harm the little people?
Remember when Bush did the same thing so that when the bubble popped we were already in tremendous debt but still had to pump out stimulus to save the world economy? Think the last 9 years of uninterrupted growth is going to continue forever? We should be raising taxes right now, not cutting them and using that to pay down debt. Nope. Pile on more debt. I hope the next crash sends us straight back to the fucking dark ages. I am going to laugh and laugh when starving people start dining on the rich.
Funny how all that "concern" *always* ends up there.
Now is the time to finish off Republicanism and the Conservative movement once and for all.
