PCResources:
I said you pick and choose to read the posts because earlier you put the words in my mouth that I would marry a b!tchy model rather then the 5'1" nice girl. I then replied no, I would move on to the next girl that I find physically attractive and mentally attractive. You then repeated the same argument again that I would rather marry the b!tchy model.
You also said you would never put yourself in the position to get attracted to a fat chick and thus you would never "fall in love" with one. This is 100% the same thing I am saying, so I don't know how you can say those things to me when you are saying the exact same thing.
And like everything, there are exceptions to the rule, i'm not setting this in stone, it's just kind of a general rule for me.
And then you say all of my claims are flawed? I'm claiming stuff?
I said you pick and choose to read the posts because earlier you put the words in my mouth that I would marry a b!tchy model rather then the 5'1" nice girl. I then replied no, I would move on to the next girl that I find physically attractive and mentally attractive. You then repeated the same argument again that I would rather marry the b!tchy model.
You also said you would never put yourself in the position to get attracted to a fat chick and thus you would never "fall in love" with one. This is 100% the same thing I am saying, so I don't know how you can say those things to me when you are saying the exact same thing.
And like everything, there are exceptions to the rule, i'm not setting this in stone, it's just kind of a general rule for me.
And then you say all of my claims are flawed? I'm claiming stuff?