Originally posted by: mAdD INDIAN
Originally posted by: RagingBITCH
Originally posted by: Jellomancer
Ahh gearing.. my 240sx beat a Firebird from 60-100.Originally posted by: mAdD INDIAN
Thing about Hondas is that they have exceptional gearing and transmission! There's a reason a Civic feels fast, its not cause of its power (which plays a part), but it has great gearing which makes it feel fast (which to me is more important than actually going fast). Nissan approaches this problem by giving you a great torque rush all the way till redline(relative..compared to domestic V8s its nothing) while having decent gearing (dependent on cars...2nd gear on the 240SX is killer while 3rd on the Maxima is exceptional).
Stock or....? And was the Firebird a V8 or just a V6? If the Firebird is a LS1 then the guy just stopped trying after 50mph and you did a ricer fly-by - a LS1's sweet spot is 3rd gear - it pulls like a mofo. Ask anyone who's run a LS1
I'm sure it was a V6 auto...those are a dog. And I'm sure a LS1 in *ANY* gear will smoke a stock 240SX. Damn V8 with its damn stump-pulling torque!![]()
Originally posted by: rootaxs
To reiterate what Mad Indian mentioned about having to look at the dyno graph's first. Take the sheets compared in this thread between the 3.5L VQ and the CL-S's 3.2L. The CL-S does make more peak HP but that's it, it's Peak. Just before hitting redline the VQ has more spunk whether it be Torque or HP. And when you're driving down the road in the city you need the power down there.
Eli, i know this engine is not available in the US market but it's an exception to the #'s you posted nevertheless. The R34 Nur and a lot more other high performance vehicles make much more HP and TQ/Litre. I'm very sure each engine from each manufacturer can make so much more power but they prefer to detune it instead. Why? I don't know but i have my "conspiracy theories" behind it![]()
It's Honda's brainwashing that has led you people to believe that horsepower by liter is such an important thing. Why don't they just use two-stroke engines
Basically, WTF cares about horsepower/liter? TOTAL horsepower and MILEAGE are important, NOT hp/liter! Anyways, the more Hp you try to extract from a given engine size the less time that engine will last, especially if you drive it hard.
Originally posted by: LXi
The new Honda V6 is nicely tuned, giving you about the same amount of power but not near enough torque. The Nissan V6s are great engines with good power and great torque but you also get the torque steer to go with it. I've heard about torque steer on almost all models based on that VQ engine. I guess for general driving pleasure the Nissans will be better, but the Honda is smoother and more docile, and also has the power when you want it. For fuel efficiency and emmission though, Honda wins easily.
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: SuperTool
To sum things up:
Toyota's V6 is a reliable engine IF you change oil every 4000 miles.
Nissan V6 is a reliable engine PERIOD.![]()
Interesting...
What is the oil change interval listed for the Maxima/Altima/etc?? And how often do you change the oil in your car?
The point is, if you don't do what someone TELLS YOU TO DO, what else do you expect?
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: rootaxs
Eli, i know this engine is not available in the US market but it's an exception to the #'s you posted nevertheless. The R34 Nur and a lot more other high performance vehicles make much more HP and TQ/Litre. I'm very sure each engine from each manufacturer can make so much more power but they prefer to detune it instead. Why? I don't know but i have my "conspiracy theories" behind it![]()
Very impressive. Since it's "rated" at 280HP, it produces 109HP/litre and 115ftlbs/litre. But as they say, with a little tuning..
Skylines are ugly...Originally posted by: rootaxs
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: rootaxs
Eli, i know this engine is not available in the US market but it's an exception to the #'s you posted nevertheless. The R34 Nur and a lot more other high performance vehicles make much more HP and TQ/Litre. I'm very sure each engine from each manufacturer can make so much more power but they prefer to detune it instead. Why? I don't know but i have my "conspiracy theories" behind it![]()
Very impressive. Since it's "rated" at 280HP, it produces 109HP/litre and 115ftlbs/litre. But as they say, with a little tuning..
Actually it's rated at a tad over 400hp (where with a little tuning could go higher) and detuned to 280 due to Japan regulations. The Skyline engines are known to put over 800hp reliably so even at 400 out of the box that could still be pretty reliable... oh how i wish to own such a beautiful car. *sigh*
Originally posted by: NFS4
Also, when it comes to hybrids, Toyota and Honda have Nissan whooped.
When Nissan wanted to develop hybrid powertrains for their cars, who did they go to??? They signed a deal with Toyota to use THEIR technology.
Who did GM go for hybrid engine technology?? They too signed a deal with Toyota.
Where did GM go when they wanted to put a new V6 engine in their VUE sport-ute for the next model year?? They signed a deal with Honda to provide them with SOHC 3.0 liter V6 engines.
Too bad no one leans on Nissan for engines...I wonder why??![]()
Uh...Lola uses Nissan engines (3l VQ) in the Le Mans and various other races, Infiniti uses Nissan's V8s in IRL (I think that's the series..not sure), I believe Toyota/Nissan were sharing technology equally...finally isn't the Sentra CA the most environmentally friendly gasoline powered car in the US??
Under the deal unveiled Monday, Toyota will supply hybrid system components for Nissan models sold in the United States starting in 2006, targeting 100,000 vehicles over a five-year period, both sides said.
Originally posted by: NFS4
Uh...Lola uses Nissan engines (3l VQ) in the Le Mans and various other races, Infiniti uses Nissan's V8s in IRL (I think that's the series..not sure), I believe Toyota/Nissan were sharing technology equally...finally isn't the Sentra CA the most environmentally friendly gasoline powered car in the US??
All you can give are race scenarios, like that's any good to the buying public. And Infiniti IS Nissan so that IRL reference is pretty lame.
And the "cleanest" gas cars sold in America are the Honda Insight and the Toyota Prius.
Also, Toyota is SUPPLYING Nissan with hybrid systems:
Under the deal unveiled Monday, Toyota will supply hybrid system components for Nissan models sold in the United States starting in 2006, targeting 100,000 vehicles over a five-year period, both sides said.
http://www.auto.com/industry/iwira3_20020903.htm
Originally posted by: mAdD INDIAN
Originally posted by: RossMAN
Performance - Nissan
Fuel efficient & reliable - Honda and Toyota
What do you mean by best performing? In what category?? Honda has the best engine in terms of giving you teh aural excitement such as the 9000RPM 2l 4-cyl or the Type-R engine.
Nissan seems to have the most balanced engine with a flat torque which gives lots of low-end power and great mid-range power and decent high-end power in their new 4-cyl and 6-cyl/8-cyl engines. Their older 4-cyl was a great bulletproof motor (SR20DE-(T)) that had a great torque curve and loved to rev high. In turbocharged form it was exceptionally powerful.
Then you have their inline 6s which are pretty damn stout and powerful. Nissan is more of a performance company. Their earlier cars were aimed at performance (Datsun 510, Z-all generations, Skyline, 180/200/240SX, older Maximas (RWD), Glorias, hell their JDM Altimas have a turbo4-AWD option as well.)
Their older cars are still being raced today, such as the Datsun 510 and older Zs, while their performance economy cars are also raced in their own class (older Sentra SE-R, 200SX SE-R, occasional 240SX,etc..)
Toyota's cars are more aimed at comfort rather than performance or 'enjoyment' factor although they do have some great engines, such as the inline 6 in the Supra.
Originally posted by: mAdD INDIAN
Originally posted by: NFS4
Uh...Lola uses Nissan engines (3l VQ) in the Le Mans and various other races, Infiniti uses Nissan's V8s in IRL (I think that's the series..not sure), I believe Toyota/Nissan were sharing technology equally...finally isn't the Sentra CA the most environmentally friendly gasoline powered car in the US??
All you can give are race scenarios, like that's any good to the buying public. And Infiniti IS Nissan so that IRL reference is pretty lame.
And the "cleanest" gas cars sold in America are the Honda Insight and the Toyota Prius.
Also, Toyota is SUPPLYING Nissan with hybrid systems:
Under the deal unveiled Monday, Toyota will supply hybrid system components for Nissan models sold in the United States starting in 2006, targeting 100,000 vehicles over a five-year period, both sides said.
http://www.auto.com/industry/iwira3_20020903.htm
Who said anything about hte buying public? I was talkin about these company's as an engine manufacturing company for designing the best engines not specifically for consumer interest. Also, I used Infiniti since the engine is badged under Infiniti ( I know its a Nissan) and I don't see how that is lame.
And about teh Sentra CA I was talking about a gasoline engine car, not a hybrid. But yes your are right on that frnt that Honda/Toyota are leaders in that field. But I don't really give a damn about that (not now anyway) so to me its a moot point.
I care about engines that excite you and have emotion. Honda and Nissan have those engines...Toyota sadly does not (apart from the 2GZE and the older 1.6L in the Corollas). And again, i don't give a damn about what the buying public wants.
Originally posted by: LAUST
As far as ease of workin on, Honda
As far as the worst to work on.. Nissan.. that 2.8 can kiss my A$$ and I hope my sister in law sells hers cause I'm tired of that car.
Toyota and Honda I'd say are both pretty easy to work on, but Toyo has one thing aginst them... the 4.7 is total crap, no low end at all, and if you put any stress on the motor it's valves go to hell in under 50K
#1 Honda
#2 Toyo
#900 Nissan
