Honda's engines vs Nissan vs Toyota?

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

CurtCold

Golden Member
Aug 15, 2002
1,547
0
0
Honda rules all. IF you get a generator or someother small equiptment ask people what engine will last the longest. 75% will answer honda. Look at all the old honda bikes out there too.
 

edro

Lifer
Apr 5, 2002
24,326
68
91
I am extremely Honda Biased...... so I would have to say Honda. The Accord's V6 is awesome. My parents have a brand new 2003 Red V6 Accord. It is badass! I will post some pics later this week.

 

LXi

Diamond Member
Apr 18, 2000
7,987
0
0
The new Honda V6 is nicely tuned, giving you about the same amount of power but not near enough torque. The Nissan V6s are great engines with good power and great torque but you also get the torque steer to go with it. I've heard about torque steer on almost all models based on that VQ engine. I guess for general driving pleasure the Nissans will be better, but the Honda is smoother and more docile, and also has the power when you want it. For fuel efficiency and emmission though, Honda wins easily.
 

WinkOsmosis

Banned
Sep 18, 2002
13,990
1
0
Originally posted by: mAdD INDIAN
Originally posted by: RagingBITCH
Originally posted by: Jellomancer
Originally posted by: mAdD INDIAN

Thing about Hondas is that they have exceptional gearing and transmission! There's a reason a Civic feels fast, its not cause of its power (which plays a part), but it has great gearing which makes it feel fast (which to me is more important than actually going fast). Nissan approaches this problem by giving you a great torque rush all the way till redline(relative..compared to domestic V8s its nothing) while having decent gearing (dependent on cars...2nd gear on the 240SX is killer while 3rd on the Maxima is exceptional).
Ahh gearing.. my 240sx beat a Firebird from 60-100.

Stock or....? And was the Firebird a V8 or just a V6? If the Firebird is a LS1 then the guy just stopped trying after 50mph and you did a ricer fly-by - a LS1's sweet spot is 3rd gear - it pulls like a mofo. Ask anyone who's run a LS1


I'm sure it was a V6 auto...those are a dog. And I'm sure a LS1 in *ANY* gear will smoke a stock 240SX. Damn V8 with its damn stump-pulling torque! :D

My friend who was driving said it was a WS6 but I'm pretty sure he was joking. I can't tell the difference between the V8 and V6... does the 6 have dual exhausts (I think it was quad actually)? We were just messing around, but he lined up with the Firebird and after it started accelerating, he floored it. We were just about even and then it started to accelerate slower. The guy WAS still pushing it though. I assumed it was an auto stuck in 4th gear.
 

Eli

Super Moderator | Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
50,419
8
81
Originally posted by: rootaxs
To reiterate what Mad Indian mentioned about having to look at the dyno graph's first. Take the sheets compared in this thread between the 3.5L VQ and the CL-S's 3.2L. The CL-S does make more peak HP but that's it, it's Peak. Just before hitting redline the VQ has more spunk whether it be Torque or HP. And when you're driving down the road in the city you need the power down there.

Eli, i know this engine is not available in the US market but it's an exception to the #'s you posted nevertheless. The R34 Nur and a lot more other high performance vehicles make much more HP and TQ/Litre. I'm very sure each engine from each manufacturer can make so much more power but they prefer to detune it instead. Why? I don't know but i have my "conspiracy theories" behind it :D

Very impressive. Since it's "rated" at 280HP, it produces 109HP/litre and 115ftlbs/litre. But as they say, with a little tuning..

Yes, they certainly could make much more HP and TQ/litre. They are detuned in a sense... It's very hard to make an extremely reliable "racing engine". You could say the same thing about any engine. You can build a 5HP Briggs and Stratton to over 12HP.. ;) Like I said, they have to strike a big balance between reliability and performance. It's a tradeoff. It also has to do with emissions... It seems that emission control equipment also helps keep the power down.

It's Honda's brainwashing that has led you people to believe that horsepower by liter is such an important thing. Why don't they just use two-stroke engines

Basically, WTF cares about horsepower/liter? TOTAL horsepower and MILEAGE are important, NOT hp/liter! Anyways, the more Hp you try to extract from a given engine size the less time that engine will last, especially if you drive it hard.

I haven't been brainwashed by anybody. Infact, when I was compiling that list.. it was the first time I've ever heard anybody use HP and torque/litre as a comparison. Yes, that's what I said in my first post. The more power a given engine develops, the shorter it's lifespan will be, all other things being equal. That's the hardest part... finding the balance between power and reliability.
 

prontospyder

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
6,262
0
0
Originally posted by: LXi
The new Honda V6 is nicely tuned, giving you about the same amount of power but not near enough torque. The Nissan V6s are great engines with good power and great torque but you also get the torque steer to go with it. I've heard about torque steer on almost all models based on that VQ engine. I guess for general driving pleasure the Nissans will be better, but the Honda is smoother and more docile, and also has the power when you want it. For fuel efficiency and emmission though, Honda wins easily.

Well, the Nissan QR25 is ULEV certified while the VQ is LEV certified. But I agree, the Honda engines are more fuel efficient.
 

LXi

Diamond Member
Apr 18, 2000
7,987
0
0
<<Well, the Nissan QR25 is ULEV certified while the VQ is LEV certified. But I agree, the Honda engines are more fuel efficient.>>

The Honda engines still best them. Selected models with the 2.4L I4 satisfies even the strictest SULEV requirement in California, while their 3.0L V6 is ULEV in the required states.
 

mAdD INDIAN

Diamond Member
Oct 11, 1999
7,804
1
0
Originally posted by: NFS4
Originally posted by: SuperTool
To sum things up:
Toyota's V6 is a reliable engine IF you change oil every 4000 miles.
Nissan V6 is a reliable engine PERIOD. :D

Interesting...

What is the oil change interval listed for the Maxima/Altima/etc?? And how often do you change the oil in your car?

The point is, if you don't do what someone TELLS YOU TO DO, what else do you expect?

I don't know if this aws posted in teh thread, but there is a nice spreadsheet on Maxima.org that displays the oil anaylsis from various cars (from Maximas to TLs) during various intervals and driving conditions. the oil sample shows how much wear was on the engine, and some of the engines have been using 100shot of nitrous for over 100k miles, other are superchargerd, etc...

Its a nice info/reference.
 

rootaxs

Platinum Member
Oct 22, 2000
2,487
0
71
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: rootaxs
Eli, i know this engine is not available in the US market but it's an exception to the #'s you posted nevertheless. The R34 Nur and a lot more other high performance vehicles make much more HP and TQ/Litre. I'm very sure each engine from each manufacturer can make so much more power but they prefer to detune it instead. Why? I don't know but i have my "conspiracy theories" behind it :D

Very impressive. Since it's "rated" at 280HP, it produces 109HP/litre and 115ftlbs/litre. But as they say, with a little tuning..

Actually it's rated at a tad over 400hp (where with a little tuning could go higher) and detuned to 280 due to Japan regulations. The Skyline engines are known to put over 800hp reliably so even at 400 out of the box that could still be pretty reliable... oh how i wish to own such a beautiful car. *sigh*

 

wyvrn

Lifer
Feb 15, 2000
10,074
0
0
By the replies I have seen in this thread, it looks like a very close call. That's a good thing for the consumer when choosing a new car to buy. Personally, I don't need a mountain of power and prefer higher milage ratings. I have a V6 in my Infiniti and it's do damn expensive to drive because it guzzles gas. OTOH, I drive the snot out of my accord and the gas costs are relatively low.
 

WinkOsmosis

Banned
Sep 18, 2002
13,990
1
0
Originally posted by: rootaxs
Originally posted by: Eli
Originally posted by: rootaxs
Eli, i know this engine is not available in the US market but it's an exception to the #'s you posted nevertheless. The R34 Nur and a lot more other high performance vehicles make much more HP and TQ/Litre. I'm very sure each engine from each manufacturer can make so much more power but they prefer to detune it instead. Why? I don't know but i have my "conspiracy theories" behind it :D

Very impressive. Since it's "rated" at 280HP, it produces 109HP/litre and 115ftlbs/litre. But as they say, with a little tuning..

Actually it's rated at a tad over 400hp (where with a little tuning could go higher) and detuned to 280 due to Japan regulations. The Skyline engines are known to put over 800hp reliably so even at 400 out of the box that could still be pretty reliable... oh how i wish to own such a beautiful car. *sigh*
Skylines are ugly...
 

NFS4

No Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
72,636
48
91
Also, when it comes to hybrids, Toyota and Honda have Nissan whooped.

When Nissan wanted to develop hybrid powertrains for their cars, who did they go to??? They signed a deal with Toyota to use THEIR technology.

Who did GM go for hybrid engine technology?? They too signed a deal with Toyota.

Where did GM go when they wanted to put a new V6 engine in their VUE sport-ute for the next model year?? They signed a deal with Honda to provide them with SOHC 3.0 liter V6 engines.

Too bad no one leans on Nissan for engines...I wonder why??
rolleye.gif
 

mAdD INDIAN

Diamond Member
Oct 11, 1999
7,804
1
0
Originally posted by: NFS4
Also, when it comes to hybrids, Toyota and Honda have Nissan whooped.

When Nissan wanted to develop hybrid powertrains for their cars, who did they go to??? They signed a deal with Toyota to use THEIR technology.

Who did GM go for hybrid engine technology?? They too signed a deal with Toyota.

Where did GM go when they wanted to put a new V6 engine in their VUE sport-ute for the next model year?? They signed a deal with Honda to provide them with SOHC 3.0 liter V6 engines.

Too bad no one leans on Nissan for engines...I wonder why??
rolleye.gif

Uh...Lola uses Nissan engines (3l VQ) in the Le Mans and various other races, Infiniti uses Nissan's V8s in IRL (I think that's the series..not sure), I believe Toyota/Nissan were sharing technology equally...finally isn't the Sentra CA the most environmentally friendly gasoline powered car in the US??



 

NFS4

No Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
72,636
48
91
Uh...Lola uses Nissan engines (3l VQ) in the Le Mans and various other races, Infiniti uses Nissan's V8s in IRL (I think that's the series..not sure), I believe Toyota/Nissan were sharing technology equally...finally isn't the Sentra CA the most environmentally friendly gasoline powered car in the US??

All you can give are race scenarios, like that's any good to the buying public. And Infiniti IS Nissan so that IRL reference is pretty lame.

And the "cleanest" gas cars sold in America are the Honda Insight and the Toyota Prius.

Also, Toyota is SUPPLYING Nissan with hybrid systems:
Under the deal unveiled Monday, Toyota will supply hybrid system components for Nissan models sold in the United States starting in 2006, targeting 100,000 vehicles over a five-year period, both sides said.

http://www.auto.com/industry/iwira3_20020903.htm
 

mAdD INDIAN

Diamond Member
Oct 11, 1999
7,804
1
0
Originally posted by: NFS4
Uh...Lola uses Nissan engines (3l VQ) in the Le Mans and various other races, Infiniti uses Nissan's V8s in IRL (I think that's the series..not sure), I believe Toyota/Nissan were sharing technology equally...finally isn't the Sentra CA the most environmentally friendly gasoline powered car in the US??

All you can give are race scenarios, like that's any good to the buying public. And Infiniti IS Nissan so that IRL reference is pretty lame.

And the "cleanest" gas cars sold in America are the Honda Insight and the Toyota Prius.

Also, Toyota is SUPPLYING Nissan with hybrid systems:
Under the deal unveiled Monday, Toyota will supply hybrid system components for Nissan models sold in the United States starting in 2006, targeting 100,000 vehicles over a five-year period, both sides said.

http://www.auto.com/industry/iwira3_20020903.htm

Who said anything about hte buying public? I was talkin about these company's as an engine manufacturing company for designing the best engines not specifically for consumer interest. Also, I used Infiniti since the engine is badged under Infiniti ( I know its a Nissan) and I don't see how that is lame.

And about teh Sentra CA I was talking about a gasoline engine car, not a hybrid. But yes your are right on that frnt that Honda/Toyota are leaders in that field. But I don't really give a damn about that (not now anyway) so to me its a moot point.

I care about engines that excite you and have emotion. Honda and Nissan have those engines...Toyota sadly does not (apart from the 2GZE and the older 1.6L in the Corollas). And again, i don't give a damn about what the buying public wants.

 

Nessal

Senior member
Oct 13, 2002
380
0
0
Originally posted by: mAdD INDIAN
Originally posted by: RossMAN
Performance - Nissan
Fuel efficient & reliable - Honda and Toyota

What do you mean by best performing? In what category?? Honda has the best engine in terms of giving you teh aural excitement such as the 9000RPM 2l 4-cyl or the Type-R engine.

Nissan seems to have the most balanced engine with a flat torque which gives lots of low-end power and great mid-range power and decent high-end power in their new 4-cyl and 6-cyl/8-cyl engines. Their older 4-cyl was a great bulletproof motor (SR20DE-(T)) that had a great torque curve and loved to rev high. In turbocharged form it was exceptionally powerful.

Then you have their inline 6s which are pretty damn stout and powerful. Nissan is more of a performance company. Their earlier cars were aimed at performance (Datsun 510, Z-all generations, Skyline, 180/200/240SX, older Maximas (RWD), Glorias, hell their JDM Altimas have a turbo4-AWD option as well.)

Their older cars are still being raced today, such as the Datsun 510 and older Zs, while their performance economy cars are also raced in their own class (older Sentra SE-R, 200SX SE-R, occasional 240SX,etc..)

Toyota's cars are more aimed at comfort rather than performance or 'enjoyment' factor although they do have some great engines, such as the inline 6 in the Supra.



Did you mean the Nissan SILVIAS? I think those are the ones with the SR20Dets right?
 

NFS4

No Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
72,636
48
91
Originally posted by: mAdD INDIAN
Originally posted by: NFS4
Uh...Lola uses Nissan engines (3l VQ) in the Le Mans and various other races, Infiniti uses Nissan's V8s in IRL (I think that's the series..not sure), I believe Toyota/Nissan were sharing technology equally...finally isn't the Sentra CA the most environmentally friendly gasoline powered car in the US??

All you can give are race scenarios, like that's any good to the buying public. And Infiniti IS Nissan so that IRL reference is pretty lame.

And the "cleanest" gas cars sold in America are the Honda Insight and the Toyota Prius.

Also, Toyota is SUPPLYING Nissan with hybrid systems:
Under the deal unveiled Monday, Toyota will supply hybrid system components for Nissan models sold in the United States starting in 2006, targeting 100,000 vehicles over a five-year period, both sides said.

http://www.auto.com/industry/iwira3_20020903.htm

Who said anything about hte buying public? I was talkin about these company's as an engine manufacturing company for designing the best engines not specifically for consumer interest. Also, I used Infiniti since the engine is badged under Infiniti ( I know its a Nissan) and I don't see how that is lame.

And about teh Sentra CA I was talking about a gasoline engine car, not a hybrid. But yes your are right on that frnt that Honda/Toyota are leaders in that field. But I don't really give a damn about that (not now anyway) so to me its a moot point.

I care about engines that excite you and have emotion. Honda and Nissan have those engines...Toyota sadly does not (apart from the 2GZE and the older 1.6L in the Corollas). And again, i don't give a damn about what the buying public wants.

1) The point was that other companies use Honda/Toyota technology in their production models. This technology is available for customers to purchase. I don't see Nissan in any cross company powertrain deals other than Toyota supplying them with hybrid systems

2) Sentra CA? Never heard of it. I'd be willing to bet that the ULEV Civics are the cleanest

3) The only "excitement" to be had in a Honda vehicle is from an S2000, Integra, NSX, or RSX IMHO. V6 Accords don't exactly pour out emotion or excitement. Refinement, YES. You may not give a damn what the buying public wants, but they make a BIG impact on what YOU are able to buy. Don't belive me, look at what happened in the 90's to:

300ZX
RX7
Supra
240SX
MR2

All were victims of people flocking to SUV's and family sedans. While three of those cars have come back in new incarnations, the buying public is a fickle bunch and they help determine what a manufacturer WILL or WILL NOT produce. But for you to sit here and say that you don't care about what the buying public wants is a bit uninformed.

Cars up on the block next may include the Acura CL/CL Type-S due to poor sales. The point is, you can act like you're in your own little wonder land of performance and tire shredding, but you're not the only that decides what's "hip" or what's production worthy.
 

LAUST

Diamond Member
Sep 13, 2000
8,957
1
81
As far as ease of workin on, Honda

As far as the worst to work on.. Nissan.. that 2.8 can kiss my A$$ and I hope my sister in law sells hers cause I'm tired of that car.

Toyota and Honda I'd say are both pretty easy to work on, but Toyo has one thing aginst them... the 4.7 is total crap, no low end at all, and if you put any stress on the motor it's valves go to hell in under 50K

#1 Honda
#2 Toyo
#900 Nissan
 

NFS4

No Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
72,636
48
91
Originally posted by: LAUST
As far as ease of workin on, Honda

As far as the worst to work on.. Nissan.. that 2.8 can kiss my A$$ and I hope my sister in law sells hers cause I'm tired of that car.

Toyota and Honda I'd say are both pretty easy to work on, but Toyo has one thing aginst them... the 4.7 is total crap, no low end at all, and if you put any stress on the motor it's valves go to hell in under 50K

#1 Honda
#2 Toyo
#900 Nissan

Well, there's one opinion I respect on this matter :D