Holy Hell!! Look at this Audi accident!

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
81
Originally posted by: Shockwave
You guys want to know what happened. Look in the 2nd to last pic. Its ALL right there except what initially caused loss of control, which is of course the big thing. The road the car was coming down is straight. The first impact, which split the car, was the tree with the door wrapped around it. The car split there and 2 halves continued on.
The road was straight, as you can see in the picture. Which means no missed corner, no oversteer / understeer etc etc. It was also dry, thus no loss of control due to rain or hydroplaning.
The rate of speed was freaking FAST. The car had enough juice in it to hit a tree, shatter into two peices (Which is no small feat in and of itself) and then the remaining halves, particularly the backend, STILL had enough momentum to do signifigant damage upon the second impact with the tree, as can be see from the crushed bumper.

Ok, this isnt grandma out doin the speed limit here fellas. By the way, what kind of car is it?


97 - 01 audi a3 quattro w/ sport package here

<- owns an a4
 

Shockwave

Banned
Sep 16, 2000
9,059
0
0
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: Shockwave
You guys want to know what happened. Look in the 2nd to last pic. Its ALL right there except what initially caused loss of control, which is of course the big thing. The road the car was coming down is straight. The first impact, which split the car, was the tree with the door wrapped around it. The car split there and 2 halves continued on.
The road was straight, as you can see in the picture. Which means no missed corner, no oversteer / understeer etc etc. It was also dry, thus no loss of control due to rain or hydroplaning.
The rate of speed was freaking FAST. The car had enough juice in it to hit a tree, shatter into two peices (Which is no small feat in and of itself) and then the remaining halves, particularly the backend, STILL had enough momentum to do signifigant damage upon the second impact with the tree, as can be see from the crushed bumper.

Ok, this isnt grandma out doin the speed limit here fellas. By the way, what kind of car is it?


97 - 01 audi a3 quattro w/ sport package here

<- owns an a4

I hope the A3 is sportier then it looks....Cause it doesnt look to impressive in those pics....
 

Lifer

Banned
Feb 17, 2003
1,948
0
0
Originally posted by: Shockwave
Tree 1, car 0
Christ, the faceplate from the CD player got torn off. Man, that car got a number done on it for sure. My question, what happened? Its a straight road near as I can tell.......

uhmm... faceplates aren't exactly the most sturdy things in the world
rolleye.gif
 

MAME

Banned
Sep 19, 2003
9,281
1
0
Originally posted by: Shockwave
You guys want to know what happened. Look in the 2nd to last pic. Its ALL right there except what initially caused loss of control, which is of course the big thing. The road the car was coming down is straight. The first impact, which split the car, was the tree with the door wrapped around it. The car split there and 2 halves continued on.
The road was straight, as you can see in the picture. Which means no missed corner, no oversteer / understeer etc etc. It was also dry, thus no loss of control due to rain or hydroplaning.
The rate of speed was freaking FAST. The car had enough juice in it to hit a tree, shatter into two peices (Which is no small feat in and of itself) and then the remaining halves, particularly the backend, STILL had enough momentum to do signifigant damage upon the second impact with the tree, as can be see from the crushed bumper.

Ok, this isnt grandma out doin the speed limit here fellas. By the way, what kind of car is it?

maybe the speed limit is 55 and the swerved to avoid a deer?
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
81
Originally posted by: Shockwave
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: Shockwave
You guys want to know what happened. Look in the 2nd to last pic. Its ALL right there except what initially caused loss of control, which is of course the big thing. The road the car was coming down is straight. The first impact, which split the car, was the tree with the door wrapped around it. The car split there and 2 halves continued on.
The road was straight, as you can see in the picture. Which means no missed corner, no oversteer / understeer etc etc. It was also dry, thus no loss of control due to rain or hydroplaning.
The rate of speed was freaking FAST. The car had enough juice in it to hit a tree, shatter into two peices (Which is no small feat in and of itself) and then the remaining halves, particularly the backend, STILL had enough momentum to do signifigant damage upon the second impact with the tree, as can be see from the crushed bumper.

Ok, this isnt grandma out doin the speed limit here fellas. By the way, what kind of car is it?


97 - 01 audi a3 quattro w/ sport package here

<- owns an a4

I hope the A3 is sportier then it looks....Cause it doesnt look to impressive in those pics....

that one doesnt have the sport package (sport package includes 3 spoke steering wheel btw)
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: MAME

maybe the speed limit is 55 and the swerved to avoid a deer?

I am no physicist, but I can't imagine that a 55 MPH impact would, under any circumstances, cleanly tear a modern Audi in half like that. They have to crash-test cars for side impact at those kinds of speeds, and they don't end up being ripped apart like this.

 

Mill

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
28,558
3
81
Originally posted by: Don_Vito
Originally posted by: MAME

maybe the speed limit is 55 and the swerved to avoid a deer?

I am no physicist, but I can't imagine that a 55 MPH impact would, under any circumstances, cleanly tear a modern Audi in half like that. They have to crash-test cars for side impact at those kinds of speeds, and they don't end up being ripped apart like this.

A3 is a bit less built than an A4, and a tree is a bit more of an impact to me than an impact from a car. Then again they may test with large objects.
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
Originally posted by: Mill

A3 is a bit less built than an A4, and a tree is a bit more of an impact to me than an impact from a car. Then again they may test with large objects.

In all fairness, I think they test with side impacts from objects broader than this tree, but even so I can't imagine any modern car being torn in half by anything, even a sharp object, at 55 MPH. It's all conjecture anyway, and this is remarkable accident no matter what the circumstances.
 

Mill

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
28,558
3
81
Originally posted by: Don_Vito
Originally posted by: Mill

A3 is a bit less built than an A4, and a tree is a bit more of an impact to me than an impact from a car. Then again they may test with large objects.

In all fairness, I think they test with side impacts from objects broader than this tree, but even so I can't imagine any modern car being torn in half by anything, even a sharp object, at 55 MPH. It's all conjecture anyway, and this is remarkable accident no matter what the circumstances.

It is quite possible they were going faster than 55, but who knows what the limit was and the circumstances. I agree with you, either way it was a very odd and graphic accident. Makes me think twice about driving around the curves around here in my Audi.
 

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,484
8,345
126
Unless this car already had some sort of structural weakness in the cars frame, there is no way in hell a 55MPH collision would cause that kind of carnage.
 

MrDudeMan

Lifer
Jan 15, 2001
15,069
94
91
if its worth anything to you, wood has an immense strength at lateral loading (i design houses ;) ). a tree 12" in diameter made of yellow pine (which is about what this is, as long as its pine it wont make a huge difference) at such a low level of impact could take a dead load of up to 45,000lbs. active loading, which will be a lot more weight than dead load obviously, will cause that tree trunk to fail at about 35,000lbs. this tree, however, is bigger than 12" around...probably 18-20, so you can almost double those numbers...

now, it didnt rip the tree out, but if you look closely, it looks hunched. i realize the other trees are somewhat bending, but the one with the door implant looks to be leaning a lot. plus, bark is torn off at 6ft or more, and in order for 3000lbs to be airborne, i would say it needs to be going pretty damn fast. at any rate, it is kinda impossible to figure out the exact speed, but with the numbers i put up, you can figure out the max speed.
 

MrDudeMan

Lifer
Jan 15, 2001
15,069
94
91
actually, if someone can find the thickness of the frame for that car, i can calculate the force needed to sheer a piece of steel that size.
 

KokomoGST

Diamond Member
Nov 13, 2001
3,758
0
0
DAYYYMMM... that's so messed up. It looks surreal... like it was the result of a Hollywood effects experiment.

There were a few tree group closely together. Mebbe that car was already flipping and turning in the air by the time it hit the tree. Can you imagine and airborne car hitting a tree at speed? :Q

If some of you folks watch rally racing, you know that a slight excursion off the edge of a road in some cases can send a car flying. Rally cars are built like tanks and they STILL get smashed into poopy. It's no wonder that a smaller midsize passenger car could have parts just sheared off by the impact(s). DAYYMM...
 

Shockwave

Banned
Sep 16, 2000
9,059
0
0
The speed limit in that area would *probably* be between 45 and 65 MPH. I've never EVER in my life see a 2 lane road with a speed limit higher then 60, but I've also never been to Europe either. However, as dumb as they are (ha ha) I cant see them allowing people to blast down tree lined, 2 lane roads at 90MPH
 

TitanDiddly

Guest
Dec 8, 2003
12,696
1
0
I just sent this to some chick on IM (yes, she's hot, and no, no pics) with the title "I totalled my parent's car".
 

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,484
8,345
126
Originally posted by: Shockwave
The speed limit in that area would *probably* be between 45 and 65 MPH. I've never EVER in my life see a 2 lane road with a speed limit higher then 60, but I've also never been to Europe either. However, as dumb as they are (ha ha) I cant see them allowing people to blast down tree lined, 2 lane roads at 90MPH

South Dakota has 65MPH 2 lane highways.
 

MrDudeMan

Lifer
Jan 15, 2001
15,069
94
91
Originally posted by: vi_edit
Originally posted by: Shockwave
The speed limit in that area would *probably* be between 45 and 65 MPH. I've never EVER in my life see a 2 lane road with a speed limit higher then 60, but I've also never been to Europe either. However, as dumb as they are (ha ha) I cant see them allowing people to blast down tree lined, 2 lane roads at 90MPH

South Dakota has 65MPH 2 lane highways.

so does a place in TN
 

Mill

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
28,558
3
81
Originally posted by: vi_edit
Originally posted by: Shockwave
The speed limit in that area would *probably* be between 45 and 65 MPH. I've never EVER in my life see a 2 lane road with a speed limit higher then 60, but I've also never been to Europe either. However, as dumb as they are (ha ha) I cant see them allowing people to blast down tree lined, 2 lane roads at 90MPH

South Dakota has 65MPH 2 lane highways.

We have them down here as well.
 

MrDudeMan

Lifer
Jan 15, 2001
15,069
94
91
Originally posted by: PhasmatisNox
I just sent this to some chick on IM (yes, she's hot, and no, no pics) with the title "I totalled my parent's car".

dude, that is pretty damn weak
 

TitanDiddly

Guest
Dec 8, 2003
12,696
1
0
Originally posted by: MrDudeMan
Originally posted by: PhasmatisNox
I just sent this to some chick on IM (yes, she's hot, and no, no pics) with the title "I totalled my parent's car".

dude, that is pretty damn weak


I must admit, it's quite weak. It might have been better if there were a hilarious reaction, but as a matter of fact she hasn't looked at the pics yet.

Edit:

otherperson: I totalled my parent's car. (linked)
otherperson: oh no!!
otherperson: when?
Phasmatis Nox: look at the pics
otherperson: in one sec
Phasmatis Nox: I actually didn't survive that crash. They have AIM in heaven.
otherperson: dont say that!!
Phasmatis Nox: did you see the pics?
otherperson: not yet
otherperson: i'm downloading other ones right now
otherperson: then i will
Phasmatis Nox: alright
otherperson: omg!!!
otherperson: how did you do that??
Phasmatis Nox: 130 mph in a 45
otherperson: no that wasnt you
otherperson: please tell me it wasnt
Phasmatis Nox: I was really really drunk and completely stoned. I'm missing aleg.
Phasmatis Nox: the doctor says I can have a peg leg!
Phasmatis Nox: I'll be Pirate Ned
Phasmatis Nox: Yarr!
otherperson: wow that person must be dead

So yeah, I'm going to stop being completely disrespectful of the people who died now.
 

Shockwave

Banned
Sep 16, 2000
9,059
0
0
And that road is 2 lanes, thus its logical that 65 is about the max speed limit. And that car was goin balls to the wall past 65 MPH.
 

MrDudeMan

Lifer
Jan 15, 2001
15,069
94
91
Originally posted by: Shockwave
And that road is 2 lanes, thus its logical that 65 is about the max speed limit. And that car was goin balls to the wall past 65 MPH.

yeah, i just ran some calcs on low yield strength steel (just to underestimate the actual break impact on the member) and i am not coming up with anything less than 44m/s which is 98.4 mph...