Holy Hell!! Look at this Audi accident!

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Shockwave

Banned
Sep 16, 2000
9,059
0
0
Originally posted by: MrDudeMan
Originally posted by: Shockwave
And that road is 2 lanes, thus its logical that 65 is about the max speed limit. And that car was goin balls to the wall past 65 MPH.

yeah, i just ran some calcs on low yield strength steel (just to underestimate the actual break impact on the member) and i am not coming up with anything less than 44m/s which is 98.4 mph...

But how thick are the frame rails is the question. A light car like that obviously wont have what an SUV would, but still...Wonder how a unibody would have fared in that wreck? Probably be shattered peices all over.
 

MrDudeMan

Lifer
Jan 15, 2001
15,069
94
91
Originally posted by: Shockwave
Originally posted by: MrDudeMan
Originally posted by: Shockwave
And that road is 2 lanes, thus its logical that 65 is about the max speed limit. And that car was goin balls to the wall past 65 MPH.

yeah, i just ran some calcs on low yield strength steel (just to underestimate the actual break impact on the member) and i am not coming up with anything less than 44m/s which is 98.4 mph...

But how thick are the frame rails is the question. A light car like that obviously wont have what an SUV would, but still...Wonder how a unibody would have fared in that wreck? Probably be shattered peices all over.

well what i did was use the design of my truck, which is a certain grade of steel at about 1/4" thick. it comes in a sort of H with cross bracing every little bit, but as far as the actual pieces of steel, they wouldnt break apart like that at any less than my initially stated speed, and that is on my truck. i would venture a guess that my truck is thicker and wider than the audi in question.

edit: no pun intended
 

Shockwave

Banned
Sep 16, 2000
9,059
0
0
Originally posted by: MrDudeMan
Originally posted by: Shockwave
Originally posted by: MrDudeMan
Originally posted by: Shockwave
And that road is 2 lanes, thus its logical that 65 is about the max speed limit. And that car was goin balls to the wall past 65 MPH.

yeah, i just ran some calcs on low yield strength steel (just to underestimate the actual break impact on the member) and i am not coming up with anything less than 44m/s which is 98.4 mph...

But how thick are the frame rails is the question. A light car like that obviously wont have what an SUV would, but still...Wonder how a unibody would have fared in that wreck? Probably be shattered peices all over.

well what i did was use the design of my truck, which is a certain grade of steel at about 1/4" thick. it comes in a sort of H with cross bracing every little bit, but as far as the actual pieces of steel, they wouldnt break apart like that at any less than my initially stated speed, and that is on my truck. i would venture a guess that my truck is thicker and wider than the audi in question.

edit: no pun intended

What about 1/8". I'll bet thats right around what that Audi has on the frame, 1/8" with crossbraces front n rear. Again, this is coming from never having been under an Audi, for all i know their built Volvo tough. I dont know.

 

MrDudeMan

Lifer
Jan 15, 2001
15,069
94
91
1/8" is too thin. there are 3 things you design for when doing any type of loading...sheer & deflection are the most important...and 1/8" steel would pretty much fail very badly in even minor collisions. i would have a hard time believing any car is that thin in the frame. gimme a minute to see how that would change the impact sheer on the same piece of steel

edit: gotta get into my computer at work...need the max psi rating on steel to accurately calculate this
 

xSkyDrAx

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2003
7,706
1
0
Holy......Cow... :Q

Amazingly the wheels look to be fine. Though everything else looks surreal. I can picture the crash and it mustve happened in a split second from tree to 4 peices....damn.
 

Shockwave

Banned
Sep 16, 2000
9,059
0
0
Originally posted by: MrDudeMan
1/8" is too thin. there are 3 things you design for when doing any type of loading...sheer & deflection are the most important...and 1/8" steel would pretty much fail very badly in even minor collisions. i would have a hard time believing any car is that thin in the frame. gimme a minute to see how that would change the impact sheer on the same piece of steel

edit: gotta get into my computer at work...need the max psi rating on steel to accurately calculate this

Yeah, after thinking about it 1/8" does seem a bit thin for the frame.
 

MrDudeMan

Lifer
Jan 15, 2001
15,069
94
91
ok, actually the third component, flexure, would fail at a remarkably lower speed than this could ever have happened at. flexure is the moment of a beam or member that is connected on both ends...sort of like a torque. anyway, assuming it was 1/8" thick and a square prism of 2 inches corner to corner (basically a hollow piece of steel..like what a frame actually is) i am coming up with 22.8kips (22,800 lbs) of resisting force per foot. if the car weighs roughly 3000lbs at, lets just speculate, an even distribution of 12 feet, which is 250 lbs per foot, it would break at roughly 110mph. so my initial was a little low...
 

IGBT

Lifer
Jul 16, 2001
17,976
141
106
Trees usually win every time..I was rearended by and audi 5000 and the thing blew apart..instant junk yard..the bumper of my truck was just slightly bent...
 

sxr7171

Diamond Member
Jun 21, 2002
5,079
40
91
Originally posted by: TheChort
Originally posted by: Spencer278
The reason the tree was in reallilty good shape other then the missing bark which will kill it is that the car split in half so most of the energy was deflected to the sides.

OK, I buy that...

maybe that answers the airbag question too.
If it hit the tree with its side, then the front airbags did not deploy.



I thought I saw a side airbag deployed in one of the pics.


Also those tires are pretty worn.
 

OS

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
15,581
1
76
Originally posted by: MrDudeMan
Originally posted by: Shockwave
And that road is 2 lanes, thus its logical that 65 is about the max speed limit. And that car was goin balls to the wall past 65 MPH.

yeah, i just ran some calcs on low yield strength steel (just to underestimate the actual break impact on the member) and i am not coming up with anything less than 44m/s which is 98.4 mph...

aren't those cars built out of aluminum?

 

Nebor

Lifer
Jun 24, 2003
29,582
12
76
That accident would have been survivable in a safer car.... A steel caged Volvo comes to mind.
 

Shockwave

Banned
Sep 16, 2000
9,059
0
0
Originally posted by: Nebor
That accident would have been survivable in a safer car.... A steel caged Volvo comes to mind.

Cause a Volvo could have never gotten to that speed....
*ba da bum*
 

So

Lifer
Jul 2, 2001
25,923
17
81
Originally posted by: Sysadmin
Originally posted by: Nebor
That accident would have been survivable in a safer car.... A steel caged Volvo comes to mind.

I doubt it.....


Sysadmin

An ABRAMS comes to mind.

An Abrams filled with fire retardant cotton.
 

hans007

Lifer
Feb 1, 2000
20,212
18
81
Originally posted by: Shockwave
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: Shockwave
You guys want to know what happened. Look in the 2nd to last pic. Its ALL right there except what initially caused loss of control, which is of course the big thing. The road the car was coming down is straight. The first impact, which split the car, was the tree with the door wrapped around it. The car split there and 2 halves continued on.
The road was straight, as you can see in the picture. Which means no missed corner, no oversteer / understeer etc etc. It was also dry, thus no loss of control due to rain or hydroplaning.
The rate of speed was freaking FAST. The car had enough juice in it to hit a tree, shatter into two peices (Which is no small feat in and of itself) and then the remaining halves, particularly the backend, STILL had enough momentum to do signifigant damage upon the second impact with the tree, as can be see from the crushed bumper.

Ok, this isnt grandma out doin the speed limit here fellas. By the way, what kind of car is it?


97 - 01 audi a3 quattro w/ sport package here

<- owns an a4

I hope the A3 is sportier then it looks....Cause it doesnt look to impressive in those pics....

its supposed to be based on the golf.
 

skyking

Lifer
Nov 21, 2001
22,833
6,005
146
Live wood is a great deal stronger and more flexible than telephone poles, etc.
I witnessed a 70's muscle car, either a cuda or V8 dart, hit a pole near our farm. We were about 1200 feet away, and heard this car coming into a couple of twisties near the farm, so we looked up. He oversteered, overcorrected, and went into a left skid. The car took the pole at the fender/door junction, and it snapped very cleanly.
The cool part about it was the distance involved. It was long enough for that time delay of the sound to take effect. We hear the skid, and see the pole get clipped, then a fracton later, hear this nice <crack!>
To add insult to injury, it falls right across the roof, big old trough dent. The driver was not seriously hurt, but he went for the darwin award when he got out among the potentially live lines.
 

nitrousninja

Golden Member
Jun 21, 2000
1,095
0
76
It looks like the car was stolen. If you look at the ignition there appears to be a shim used to crank it.