marincounty
Diamond Member
- Nov 16, 2005
- 3,227
- 5
- 76
Originally posted by: Robor
Originally posted by: rchiu
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: M0RPH
She's showing boldness and speaking out against the monopolistic practises of OPEC, good for her. She never said she was going to "smash" or "break up" OPEC, that wording was purely invented by the author of the article and the OP here.
Ha.. that spin has already been attempted in this thread.
Heh, it's not a spin and you can say what you want or how you interpret her words but it doesn't change the fact that she never said about breaking up OPEC. Challenging how OPEC goes about their business and politics yes, but never anything about breaking it up.
Ok then it's empty promises pandering for votes. What's she going to promise next? Worldwide regulation of the internet?
Empty promises pandering for votes is a proven winning formula. See Ronald Reagan and GWB. Republicans have been using this formula for years. Reagan was going to cut taxes and increase military spending, all while balancing the budget. That didn't quite work out that way.
Remember Bush and his economic advisors and the surpluses as far as the eye can see, leading to nearly everyone endorsing the tax cuts which have resulted in huge deficits.
Bush even complained about the high cost of gasoline under the Democrats!
And either Al Bore or John Kerry was vastly better than the idiot Bush. Both of them actually served their country in Vietnam, Bush was awol. Bush was also a complete failure as a businessman, and anyone who looked into his backround at all realized he was completely unfit to be president. Some are now calling him the worst president ever.
I can only conclude that yes, most voters are idiots. And Hillary is running a smart, pandering campaign. It doesn't really matter to me if it's Hillary or Obama, either one is going to crush McCain.
