You are a real piece of shit aren't you! You make a claim and when asked to back it up you act like a third grader and basically say, "make me!".
Well, you little rooster sucker, here is her 1993 health care reform proposal.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/t2GPO...g/BILLS-103hr3600ih/pdf/BILLS-103hr3600ih.pdf
Here is her 2007 proposal:
http://elbertcounty.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/americanhealthchoicesplan.pdf
You'll note that not a single one has the word, "jail", or, "prison" in it relating to fines or failure to comply.
All other searches related to your claim that also made the same claim were right wing websites with
ZERO citations.
You got duped once again and instead of admitting it you bitch out like the partisan hack you are!
Lol at your arbitrary line you've drawn to protect your bubble about romneys family history. You are one pathetic piece of trash!
You probably aren't aware, but you can save a PDF down, open it with a PDF reader, and actually search for words. Well, not you per se, but normal people. In fact, whomever puts your helmet on you when you go outside can find rather a lot of references to prison. (Hint: When the bill says "imprison", it means to send someone to prison. Also, when it refers to changing penalties in other codes, it's ain't talking about time outs.)
Go to your first link.
Save it as a PDF.
Open it in Adobe Acrobat Reader.
Search for section 226 Bribery and graft in connection with health care.
Whoever corruptly gives, offers, or promises anything of value to a health care official to influence any of the health care official's actions, decisions, or duties relating to a health alliance or health plan, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than fifteen years, or both. Same threat for the health care official.
Now, this is in a section entitled "Bribery and graft in connection with health care", so clearly it's there to protect us, right? But look at the definition of "health care official". It includes employees of any organization providing services under contract to a health alliance or health plan.
The scenario (as I recall it from almost twenty years ago) was thus:
You are a Medicare patient.
Your doctor is an employee of an organization contracting with the government to provide services to you under Medicare.
Your doctor diagnoses you with a particular form of brain cancer (let's call it neoproggiplasm. Symptoms include voting Democrat and blathering.)
There are several possible drugs to treat this disease.
Medicare will pay for the cheapest two (let's call them Generical and Cheapomil) which are less effective but good enough for most people, but not the newer, more expensive drug (let's call it Miracal.)
Your doctor therefore tells you she'll write you a prescription for Cheapomil.
You go home and read everything you can find about neoproggiplasm, including claims of wondrous response to Miracal.
You come in and tell your doctor you want Miracal instead of Cheapomil.
Your doctor explains that Medicare does not cover Miracal, but if you continue to regress on Cheapomil she can then prescribe Generical.
You tell your doctor that you will pay for your Miracal from your own pocket. In fact, you'll pay for the necessary liver enzyme testing as well.
By a strict reading, you have just committed bribery by offering a health care official something of value to influence her decision, for which you can be fined and/or imprisoned for up to fifteen years.
Before you scoff at such a thing - was bribery legal before?
If not, why would this bill need to redefine it?
Remember the words of President Obama: Maybe Grandma doesn't get the hip replacement, maybe Grandma just gets a wheelchair and pain pills. He didn't add "unless she pays for it", did he?
Now that I've backslid and done the search for you, you can move on to "but that would never happen!" and "but that's a good thing!"