This was twelve years ago. If you wish to debate it now, you can do the homework. Personally it was clear to me at the time, but I'm not wasting my time reproving it to others who will deny it ever happened until re-proven and then declare it's a good thing. Otherwise, well, there are plenty of other reasons not to vote for Hillary ever. You didn't take issue with me pointing out that she filed the paperwork certifying her tennis partner as destitute for that she could get $300,000 in free money from taxpayers, so I'm assuming you're in favor of that, but surely there's something this woman has done that you would find a deal breaker were she a Republican.
Interesting. Now your argument is "I don't have to back up my bullshit because it happened several years ago." Nope, that's not how it works. You said something, now back it up. You're trying to dance because you realize you're busted. What's strange is that in theory you should be happy to be wrong, because you think it's something bad.
In reality of course you never cared about that, she's an Evil Librul so any bullshit that's needed to justify your hatred will be uncritically accepted.
We were actually discussing political dynasties. You guys gotta warn me when you've switched to "hate the rich".*
* Except of course the "right" rich - those with the magic 'D'.
We didn't. Still waiting to hear why the Romneys are not and the Clintons are. My guess is that in this case, like so many others, you didn't know what you were talking about.