• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Hillary makes it official

Page 15 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
werepossum said:
This was twelve years ago. If you wish to debate it now, you can do the homework. Personally it was clear to me at the time, but I'm not wasting my time reproving it to others who will deny it ever happened until re-proven and then declare it's a good thing. Otherwise, well, there are plenty of other reasons not to vote for Hillary ever. You didn't take issue with me pointing out that she filed the paperwork certifying her tennis partner as destitute for that she could get $300,000 in free money from taxpayers, so I'm assuming you're in favor of that, but surely there's something this woman has done that you would find a deal breaker were she a Republican.
Click to expand...

Interesting. Now your argument is "I don't have to back up my bullshit because it happened several years ago." Nope, that's not how it works. You said something, now back it up. You're trying to dance because you realize you're busted. What's strange is that in theory you should be happy to be wrong, because you think it's something bad.

In reality of course you never cared about that, she's an Evil Librul so any bullshit that's needed to justify your hatred will be uncritically accepted.

We were actually discussing political dynasties. You guys gotta warn me when you've switched to "hate the rich".*

* Except of course the "right" rich - those with the magic 'D'.
Click to expand...

We didn't. Still waiting to hear why the Romneys are not and the Clintons are. My guess is that in this case, like so many others, you didn't know what you were talking about.
 
Watched reporters act like 5 yr olds playing soccer when her van showed up.

BTW - Why does Hillary get secret service and all other candidates don't??
 
Zorkorist said:
The only thing she cares about is power.

-John
Click to expand...

Riiiiiiight. Cause all those caring, loving, 'do unto others' that are running under the gop flag aren't all about the
polls_tons_of_money_2167_4449_255726_poll_xlarge.jpeg


You delusional dimwit.
 
So she didn't get to see Hillary Clinton, and she's an entitled Iowan?

http://www.buzzfeed.com/katherinemiller/the-right-wing-has-its-own-upworthy-and-you-wont-believe-how
And while the site is unknown among the Washington, D.C., conservatives who dominate the movement media, it is a Beltway product, owned by a company founded by two well-connected Republican political consultants, former Tim Pawlenty adviser Phil Musser and Alex Skatell, a former staffer for the National Republican Senatorial Committee.
Like Upworthy, the site is focused on framing, not reporting.
IJReview.com is just conservative news, political or cultural, distilled down and reframed.
Click to expand...
 
CZroe said:
No. She proved that Hillary's claim of being at the school to speak with "everyday Iowans" was a fabrication. Everyday Iowans were locked down in their classrooms or denied access.
Click to expand...

She spoke with some everyday Iowans. She never said she was there to speak with all everyday Iowans. The only fabrication here is this non-story from a right wing non-news site.
BTW, are there non-everyday Iowans?
 
Bowfinger said:
Though if you happen to mention GW Bush, they'll screech on cue about how the past doesn't matter and you need to get over him. Just the usual hypocrisy.
Click to expand...

Get over thousands of Americans unnecessarily killed and trillions wasted on Bush's wars. Get over about Republicans driving the American economy into a ditch.
But that Clinton girlfriend, now let's talk about that.
 
senseamp said:
She spoke with some everyday Iowans. She never said she was there to speak with all everyday Iowans. The only fabrication here is this non-story from a right wing non-news site.
BTW, are there non-everyday Iowans?
Click to expand...
Nonsense! Clearly they should have opened the room so all 3 million Iowans could talk to her.

/s
 
senseamp said:
She spoke with some everyday Iowans. She never said she was there to speak with all everyday Iowans. The only fabrication here is this non-story from a right wing non-news site.
BTW, are there non-everyday Iowans?
Click to expand...

That's just it. Select Iowans != everyday Iowans unless everyday Iowans were allowed to participate in the selection. Where was selection held and how could an everyday Iowan participate? It's a Potemkin Village, plain as day.
 
CZroe said:
No. She proved that Hillary's claim of being at the school to speak with "everyday Iowans" was a fabrication. Everyday Iowans were locked down in their classrooms or denied access.
Click to expand...

Can you tell us on a scale of 1 to 10 where this registers on your outrage meter?
 
CZroe said:
That's just it. Select Iowans != everyday Iowans unless everyday Iowans were allowed to participate in the selection. Where was selection held and how could an everyday Iowan participate? It's a Potemkin Village, plain as day.
Click to expand...

So people she spoke to are not everyday Iowans?
Proof?
 
senseamp said:
She spoke with some everyday Iowans. She never said she was there to speak with all everyday Iowans. The only fabrication here is this non-story from a right wing non-news site.
BTW, are there non-everyday Iowans?
Click to expand...

Are you that obtuse? Of course there are. If you cherry-pick, then you get something else entirely. It defeats the purpose. We have plenty of indications that she controlled who she talked to and no proof or indication that she did not. Can someone show where she got them from?
 
CZroe said:
Are you that obtuse? Of course there are. If you cherry-pick, then you get something else entirely. It defeats the purpose. We have plenty of indications that she controlled who she talked to and no proof or indication that she did not. Can someone show where she got them from?
Click to expand...

Holy shit, are you guys outraged that she has scripted campaign events now? Like every politician? I thought this thread can't get much more embarrassing after DSF crapping his pants and werepossum demanding that other people disprove random crap he heard a decade ago but here we are!

You guys need to pace yourselves on the manufactured rage. You're going to have a stroke or something.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top