Hillary makes it official

[Matt1970]

Lol! Oh the irony! Poor, poor, stupid matt1970.

Nice rebuttal dumbass.

 

[ivwshane]

Nice rebuttal dumbass.

And so is your point moron.

 

[Drako]

Is this Uranium One issue going to kill Hillary's candidacy?

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0

 

[OutHouse]

Is this Uranium One issue going to kill Hillary's candidacy?

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0

one can hope. she is corrupt and why people trust her is truly a mystery.

 

[soundforbjt]

one can hope. she is corrupt and why people trust her is truly a mystery.

I don't trust any politician, please do tell, who on the right is trustworthy to vote for?

 

[rudeguy]

I don't trust any politician, please do tell, who on the right is trustworthy to vote for?

Please give us some examples of any of the republican candidates who have blatantly lied.

Better yet, please tell me why you would trust Hillary to run our country.

 

[ivwshane]

Please give us some examples of any of the republican candidates who have blatantly lied.

Better yet, please tell me why you would trust Hillary to run our country.

You might live in a bubble if you need other people to point out lies by republicans.

Everyone lies, everyone. More importantly is the intent behind the lie.


I'd answer your second question but since you never answer anyone else's, I'll assume you are trolling again and you couldn't care less about any answer given to you. But just in case you are serious, how about you tell us what policies clinton supports that you think are bad for this country or are reasons why she shouldn't be president.

 

[cabri]

Is this Uranium One issue going to kill Hillary's candidacy?

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0

Another potential issue - coincidences abound
https://www.yahoo.com/politics/hillary-campaign-swats-at-iran-charge-in-clinton-117131652941.html

“The really troubling thing about Bill’s speeches is the apparent correlation between his fees and Hillary’s decisions during her tenure as secretary of state,” Schweizer writes.

In a chapter obtained by Yahoo News, Schweizer marshals circumstantial evidence to suggest that Sweden-based global telecommunications giant Ericsson effectively influenced Hillary to spare it from punishing economic sanctions for doing business with Iran by paying $750,000 to Bill Clinton to speak at a Nov. 12, 2011, telecom conference in Hong Kong. There is, however, no smoking gun.

 

[rudeguy]

You might live in a bubble if you need other people to point out lies by republicans.

Everyone lies, everyone. More importantly is the intent behind the lie.


I'd answer your second question but since you never answer anyone else's, I'll assume you are trolling again and you couldn't care less about any answer given to you. But just in case you are serious, how about you tell us what policies clinton supports that you think are bad for this country or are reasons why she shouldn't be president.

Her policy of "being a champion for the middle class" after she demanded top end private jets and hundreds of thousands of dollars for a few hours of her time.

Her policy of lying.

Her policy of disregarding the rules and laws of government meant to keep her accountable to the public.

Her policy of lying.

Her policy of allowing her husband to be a close friend of a pedophile.

Her policy of claiming to be for campaign finance reform while trying to raise the most money of any campaign in history.

Her policy of lying.

 

[ivwshane]

Another potential issue - coincidences abound
https://www.yahoo.com/politics/hillary-campaign-swats-at-iran-charge-in-clinton-117131652941.html

"Circumstantial evidence" and "no smoking gun", is all you righties need to suck it up like a cheap whore and accept it as truth

 

[ivwshane]

You are truely one dumb ass mother fucker! Go burn your fingers some more on your crack pipe, I mean, soldering iron.

Her policy of "being a champion for the middle class" after she demanded top end private jets and hundreds of thousands of dollars for a few hours of her time.

Her policy of lying.

Her policy of disregarding the rules and laws of government meant to keep her accountable to the public.

Her policy of lying.

Her policy of allowing her husband to be a close friend of a pedophile.

Her policy of claiming to be for campaign finance reform while trying to raise the most money of any campaign in history.

Her policy of lying.

 

[rudeguy]

You are truely one dumb ass mother fucker! Go burn your fingers some more on your crack pipe, I mean, soldering iron.

There we go!

Deflect
Personal attack

Now you just have to blame Bush and you will have all the Libtard strategies covered!

 

[nickqt]

There we go!

Deflect
Personal attack

Now you just have to blame Bush and you will have all the Libtard strategies covered!

Perhaps if your statements didn't classify her of having "Policies" that aren't a policy would make it easier to have an actual conversation.

Instead, you classify her as having Policies that aren't policies.

Her getting access to a private jet doesn't affect a middle class person, and isn't a policy.

Her allowing her husband's cousin's frogs owners uncle to have a relationship with a shovel isn't a policy.

Conservatard strategies in effect.

Keep on keepin' on.

 

[hal2kilo]

Perhaps if your statements didn't classify her of having "Policies" that aren't a policy would make it easier to have an actual conversation.

Instead, you classify her as having Policies that aren't policies.

Her getting access to a private jet doesn't affect a middle class person, and isn't a policy.

Her allowing her husband's cousin's frogs owners uncle to have a relationship with a shovel isn't a policy.

Conservatard strategies in effect.

Keep on keepin' on.

Hating Clintons must be a sport for conservatives. Believe me, I have no speacial love of either Bill and especially Hillary, but just the enormous conservative hate machine is awsome in it's strengh and breadth. Hating is such an energy drain on the brain. But you guys keep up the faith.

 

[nickqt]

Hating Clintons must be a sport for conservatives. Believe me, I have no speacial love of either Bill and especially Hillary, but just the enormous conservative hate machine is awsome in it's strengh and breadth. Hating is such an energy drain on the brain. But you guys keep up the faith.

I have no love for Clinton or Obama. Both are 70's era socially liberal Republicans, but of course the Republican party has gone insane, so now 70s era socially liberal Republicans who run as Democrats are branded as socialist communist atheist fascists, because for Republicans, the other side is always attempting to destroy Murrica and sell us out to the c̶o̶m̶m̶i̶e̶s̶ Muslims.

Unfortunately, they've all become lil Rush Limbaughs, so it's attack attack attack, and because they don't think of what they're saying, they just throw everything out there. So, Hillary Clinton now has a policy of allowing her husband's uncle's pig to live on a farm of a man who once knew someone who blew up a bullfrog with a firecracker. As if that matters to anyone besides someone who has been well trained to just attack attack attack.

It's sad, really. No discussion, just constant attacks.

The difference between myself and others is that instead of screaming back at them and calling them names, I simply hold up a mirror to the inane BS they just vomited out of their reptile brain, so they can see just how stupid it is.

 

[cabri]

"Circumstantial evidence" and "no smoking gun", is all you righties need to suck it up like a cheap whore and accept it as truth

All I stated was this is a potential issue; enough to again raise some concern.

There is no smoking gun - you may have noticed that I bolded that.

The problem with Hilary is that she extrudes grey area and refuses to initially come clean on anything until her feet are held to the fire.

Just like the email server; waffled all over until the details finally caught up with her.


While you complain about the righties whoring talking points; you also refuse to look at yourselves where you take everything coming from the Obama/Clinton groups as gospel and dismiss anything that shows feet of clay.

If you put your leadership on a pedestal; expect that people will ask why

 

[ivwshane]

Yeah but he used the word, "policy" in each scentence so surely that makes it her policies!

/s


Righties are like sheep; dumb, easily scared, they have a herd mentality, easily herded, offer lots of fluff, and when they speak nothing coherent comes out of their mouths.

Perhaps if your statements didn't classify her of having "Policies" that aren't a policy would make it easier to have an actual conversation.

Instead, you classify her as having Policies that aren't policies.

Her getting access to a private jet doesn't affect a middle class person, and isn't a policy.

Her allowing her husband's cousin's frogs owners uncle to have a relationship with a shovel isn't a policy.

Conservatard strategies in effect.

Keep on keepin' on.

 

[ivwshane]

All I stated was this is a potential issue; enough to again raise some concern.

There is no smoking gun - you may have noticed that I bolded that.

The problem with Hilary is that she extrudes grey area and refuses to initially come clean on anything until her feet are held to the fire.

Just like the email server; waffled all over until the details finally caught up with her.


While you complain about the righties whoring talking points; you also refuse to look at yourselves where you take everything coming from the Obama/Clinton groups as gospel and dismiss anything that shows feet of clay.

If you put your leadership on a pedestal; expect that people will ask why

Like a lot of your statements, that's not true at all. You can look at the biggest news stories since Obama was elected and most real stories were broke by the left, including the "email scandal".

The problem with you righties is that you are incapable vetting the scandals that are regurgitated to you. It's why there is still talk about Obama being an American hating Muslim, it's why righties still give credence to dick Cheney and his policies, it's why righties support politicians who, on record, deny science, it's why you support voter ID laws in the name of fraud prevention despite every voter ID law submitted not addressing voter fraud perpetrated by absentee ballots (the most common of voter fraud). It's why, when people counter the rights claims they are deemed "shills", or are putting their team members "on a pedastal".

You live in a bubble and you aren't even fucking aware of it. Cue a nice long post by moonbeam about your CBD

 

[soundforbjt]

I'd like to see some threads here from the right/conservatives extolling the values/platform of their favorite choice, instead nothing but bashing the other opponent.
Don't any of you repubs like any of your choices? Where's the support? You can't get anyone interested if you show no support for your own...Or are your prospects that bad?

 

[rudeguy]

I'd like to see some threads here from the right/conservatives extolling the values/platform of their favorite choice, instead nothing but bashing the other opponent.
Don't any of you repubs like any of your choices? Where's the support? You can't get anyone interested if you show no support for your own...Or are your prospects that bad?

I'd like to see you answer my questions.

 

[nickqt]

I'd like to see you answer my questions.

Your questions being:

You stating that Hillary Clinton has a policy of allowing her husband to be friends with a pig farmer in Nebraska who once dated a girl who streaked during a football game in 1957 whose uncle was convicted of a minor misdemeanor in 1982?

Those brilliant questions?

Or the statements that Hillary Clinton has a policy of lying because, well, you say so.

 

[doubledeluxe]

I'm not interested in any of the major candidates. I don't need these dynasties. Hilary has contributed all she has to offer. We need fresh faces, new ideas, and younger leaders who are not infected by the greed, power, and corruption of the current system.

It really boils down to her having no new ideas. Jeb Bush? There was a funny commentary that I saw where he promised to come up with new ways for his family to involve the US in pointless wars and quagmires. It was satire of course but there really is something to it.

We cannot, under any circumstances, vote these old fossils with their stagnant ideas into power.

 

[MongGrel]

If this thread keeps popping up the next year and a half I imagine I'll just pop in now and then and smash my face on the keyboard.

 

[boomerang]

I'd like to see some threads here from the right/conservatives extolling the values/platform of their favorite choice, instead nothing but bashing the other opponent.
Don't any of you repubs like any of your choices? Where's the support? You can't get anyone interested if you show no support for your own...Or are your prospects that bad?

You're my favorite choice. But if I start a thread about you it will be deemed a callout thread, it will get locked and I may get disciplined.

 

[JSt0rm]

I'd like to see you answer my questions.