I admit, that's a pretty stupid move on her part. Shows some disconnect.....
But what am I supposed to do, vote for Trump now? LOL.
Sadly yes, have to go with the lesser of the evils, so Trump it is.
I admit, that's a pretty stupid move on her part. Shows some disconnect.....
But what am I supposed to do, vote for Trump now? LOL.
yeah, but the difference is that Hillary doesn't loudly claim that she wants to deport NS1.
http://www.theamericanmirror.com/hillarys-ca-support-falls-30-2008/:
She had 30% more votes when she ran against the guy who won the presidency in 2008! She is toast.
I think "ego" is a prerequisite for anybody wanting to be president.I feel the knee-jerk desire to call out Hilary about this, but what politician do we have that comes off as a humble servant of the people? We need better checks and balances, especially for ego.
Yup, that's pretty stupid to wear a jacket that costs more than some folks make in a year. Not really thinking that all the way through, considering the topic of her speech.
Her suit is worth more than any car I have purchased in the last decade. That is simply unimaginable to me.
I really don't see the issue. Is she supposed to dress in rags if she's talking about the poor? She's made good money in her lifetime, she can spend it on clothes if she wants.
Donald Trump says: "Don't be a loser and get a better job so you can buy yourself a real car".
Sorry couldn't resist.
Meh, I don't buy things as status symbols, I buy them for utility. Go figure...
I really don't see the issue. Is she supposed to dress in rags if she's talking about the poor? She's made good money in her lifetime, she can spend it on clothes if she wants.
It is funny reading boy's rant about cost of a woman's outfit.
Never had a woman in your life huh?
Of course she can spend it on clothes. It's her money and she can spends it however she wishes. However, if she spends $12k + on an ugly outfit and then proceeds to lecture everyone about the problem of wealth inequality and how she's going to fix it, it comes across as majorly hypocritical and disingenuous.
The cost of the outfit in an of itself is not an issue, and whether she's a woman or not is irrelevant. The issue is the blatant hypocrisy of the combination of her spending that kind of money on an outfit while lecturing the rest of us on how we need her to fix wealth inequality.
Of course she can spend it on clothes. It's her money and she can spends it however she wishes. However, if she spends $12k + on an ugly outfit and then proceeds to lecture everyone about the problem of wealth inequality and how she's going to fix it, it comes across as majorly hypocritical and disingenuous.
The cost of the outfit in an of itself is not an issue, and whether she's a woman or not is irrelevant. The issue is the blatant hypocrisy of the combination of her spending that kind of money on an outfit while lecturing the rest of us on how we need her to fix wealth inequality.
I don't think you know what the word "hypocrisy" means.
hy·poc·ri·sy
həˈpäkrəsē/
noun
noun: hypocrisy; plural noun: hypocrisies
the practice of claiming to have moral standards or beliefs to which one's own behavior does not conform; pretense.
synonyms:dissimulation, false virtue, cant, posturing, affectation, speciousness, empty talk, insincerity, falseness, deceit, dishonesty, mendacity, pretense, duplicity
... and apparently you thought wrong then, because I'm very well aware of what it means.
That's such a perfect summation of her, they should just go ahead and put a picture of her next to it![]()
He gone. His cake is done baked.Yes and in order for her to be a hypocrite she would have to be against people being rich. She isn't, she is for helping people become richer. So no hypocrisy found.
https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/plan-raise-american-incomes/
Your dishonest framing of her positions may work on other forums and right wing websites when trying to justify your opinion, but it's a bullshit justification and you've been called out on it.
Time for a wealth tax.
Time for a wealth tax.
https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/plan-raise-american-incomes/Yes and in order for her to be a hypocrite she would have to be against people being rich. She isn't, she is for helping people become richer. So no hypocrisy found.
https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/plan-raise-american-incomes/
Well, there is one sort of wealth tax in most places, property tax.
I just wish my city would vastly undervalue my property like they are Hillary's. http://www.marketwatch.com/story/th...e-2016-presidential-candidates-own-2015-07-10 Instead they value it for way more than I'll ever be able to sell it for :|
[/URL]
What complete and utter drivel. She is busy lecturing everyone about how she is going to fix wealth inequality and how bad it is. It's like when she lectures us about the wealthy not paying their fair share, then turns around and uses every loophole known to man to avoid paying her "fair share". Typical hypocrite.
And please, linking to hildebeast website isn't particularly useful, zero credibility there. Just lies, lies and more lies.