I mean seriously, do you really mean authority must not be questioned?
I don't see anyone questioning authority on these forums.
Uhm,... I don't see anyone questioning authority on these forums.
It's purely bashing. And, any comment with a "?" at the end, are pure mockery (bashing as well).
Some of you guys have a hate-on for authority, unless it has INC., LLP or some other corporate tail to it's name.
And in regards to assumptions,.. just look at the replies in cop bashing threads; most are sweeping comments about how all cops are bad. So, again, maybe you should direct the reservations on making broad strokes towards someone else.
Well you have met one now.
Uhm,... I don't see anyone questioning authority on these forums.
Are you illiterate or just stupid?
Bashing isn't questioning.
However, if it is, then I've been questioning you guys when I mock your senstationalism.
Yeah!
Damn US Government needs to know what to stick it's nose in; women's vaginas, gay people's bed rooms and corporate welfare!!
Leave our beer, guns and fertilizer plants alone!!
Good thing you are going after people for their spelling.
No you bash and hate on authority, your arguments are henceforth invalid.
That was a pretty weak attempt at trolling.
I'm surprised you were able to snag as many as you did...
Yes I am sure that feed sellers are very happy that beer makers have a way to sell feed for less than they can. You do realize that chances are this started when feed makers/sellers complained.
If you ran a business but had to meet certain guidelines that added cost you be ok with a competitor not having to meet them and under cutting you right?
Yes I am sure that feed sellers are very happy that beer makers have a way to sell feed for less than they can. You do realize that chances are this started when feed makers/sellers complained.
If you ran a business but had to meet certain guidelines that added cost you be ok with a competitor not having to meet them and under cutting you right?
Crazy idea to use grains not going to cattle as ingredients in foods for humans. I will never understand the brain of a liberal... on one hand they constantly cry about the environment... now people like you are glad the FDA wants to force brewers to throw away something that can be reused.
Instead of the government trying to fix a problem that doesn't exist.... why don't they remove ethanol subsidies and make more (and cheaper) corn available to cattle farmers?
Do you really believe the beer companies are a major source of feed for cattle? I'd guess they provide a small% of overall feed sales. So the FDA in this case isn't really about protecting food supply or safety. They are pushing this for the profits of corporations. Sounds wonderful.
So the major feed suppliers make more money while this source of feed gets dumped in a landfill.
Oh, none.
You see, you are complaining about too many gay threads. But, have no issues with the many cop threads.
So, it has nothing to do with quantity,.. it's the content.
What do you have against women and gays??
If that were the case then the whole deal by the OP is BS. As throwing away a small amount would not affect the price of beer.
Crazy idea to use grains not going to cattle as ingredients in foods for humans. I will never understand the brain of a liberal... on one hand they constantly cry about the environment... now people like you are glad the FDA wants to force brewers to throw away something that can be reused.
Instead of the government trying to fix a problem that doesn't exist.... why don't they remove ethanol subsidies and make more (and cheaper) corn available to cattle farmers?
All regulation is started by a small marginalized group. That is the essence of majority rule democracy. A small marginalized group complains, the politicians bend their ear, figure out how they can make a buck on it, and tell the people it is for the good of the general public.
Same standard as others for what? Has feeding the spent grain to livestock been a detriment?