dainthomas
Lifer
- Dec 7, 2004
- 14,935
- 3,914
- 136
I can't believe there were people who wouldn't bother paying after the first highly publicized incident of a house being allowed to burn down.
Yeah, this.
I can't believe there were people who wouldn't bother paying after the first highly publicized incident of a house being allowed to burn down.
I pay for everything, I pay my rent, I buy my food. I pay for it all 100% I also have non taxable income, like my student loan
Don't college students have after school JOBS in the UK, or are they all they all racking up student loan debt like you?
Hah, I can just imagine fireman pulling out a card reader to charge you during fire.
If it's like the other story, these folks in the country have elected not to have their property taxes fund a fire dept but the nearby city is willing to cover them if they pay a fee.
Only people to blame are the home owners. They took the risk and got burned.
We do, and I do. But my student loan I pay pack at the rate of inflation it is automatically taken at a very very small amount when / if I earn over £18k a year, if I don't it gets written off, it's barely debt. It won't cost me anything for a long time, If you are a uni student in the Uk and you don't have a student loan you are an idiot. It's the best loan you will ever get
I really don't think that the people who run this fire department belong in civil society. They have nothing but contempt for the people who pay their salary.
Didn't read but the first few posts, but if a free market fire department did this they'd go out of business. Also, part of the reason this happened was because this was a public fire dept. They're a monopoly, the market can't put them out of business. They can charge whatever they want to.
I really don't think that the people who run this fire department belong in civil society. They have nothing but contempt for the people who pay their salary.
But doesn't their county give the fire department a monopoly?The owners of this house don't pay the firefighters' salary.
I don't disagree but having this be an optional service is pretty dumb public policy. Think of it this way 90% of people are going to take the service anyway, and anyone in the other 10% who has their house burn down is going to end up on welfare and food stamps anyway.
But doesn't their county give the fire department a monopoly?
his taxable income level is below the minimum.Don't college students have after school JOBS in the UK, or are they all they all racking up student loan debt like you?
But doesn't their county give the fire department a monopoly?
Don't get me wrong, devolution is good (it's actually currently being debated in the VA legislature and I hope that it happens, but powerful interests in NoVA don't want to pay for their own roads; it's a usual case of the elites not being able to handle decentralism) but taxes are high where I live because of all of the waste and because they won't repudiate the debt (the city has brought in a surplus at least for the past 2 years, but they're servicing the debt).
But doesn't their county give the fire department a monopoly?
They support the people that pay their salary.Didn't read but the first few posts, but if a free market fire department did this they'd go out of business. Also, part of the reason this happened was because this was a public fire dept. They're a monopoly, the market can't put them out of business. They can charge whatever they want to.
I really don't think that the people who run this fire department belong in civil society. They have nothing but contempt for the people who pay their salary.

If it's like the other story, these folks in the country have elected not to have their property taxes fund a fire dept but the nearby city is willing to cover them if they pay a fee.
Only people to blame are the home owners. They took the risk and got burned.
It's nice of the firefighters to have come out to watch the fire and make sure it didn't spread to paying customers.
