- Jun 23, 2001
- 27,730
- 8
- 0
http://www.cnn.com/2011/11/01/tech/mobile/iphone-4s-battery-life/index.html
Keep in mind, CNN Tech is the source for this. Their reliability isn't exactly high.
Few things I highlighted in bold.
First, no battery powered consumer device gets what the manufacturer rates it at. Even my MBA falls short of the rated time Apple lists, by a good 25%. It only comes close under ideal conditions, ie, with the LCD on its dimmest, no wireless on, etc. Complaining to Apple because your phone doesn't last as long as the spec sheet is idiotic and makes you look like an ignorant child.
Second, I know iOS users only recently got multitasking, so there might be a learning curve. But, all other smart phone platform users have learned full well that an app or service actively working in the background is going to suck battery power, often very quickly. Google Maps drains my T-bolt if I leave it running in the background with location services on, for example. Not sure if this is a similar situation with the 4S or not.
Third, the last bolded part. Apple stuck a powerful SoC into the 4S with the A5. The A5 & SGX543 may use less power at idle than the older A4, but at load, its going to use more power. There's simply more transistors and die that need to be powered up. For Apple to claim that it won't is ludicrous and for customers to believe him shows them to be naive.
Lastly, no where in the CNN article does it list any battery live lengths for the people who are complaining or compare it to the iP4. It only lists the official spec sheet for each. Regardless, I'm sure a 4S user is getting better battery life than my T-Bolt does, even heavily modded.
Any 4S users want to weigh in?
Keep in mind, CNN Tech is the source for this. Their reliability isn't exactly high.
A post on the Apple support forums, begun on October 15 to discuss battery problems, was still active Tuesday -- two weeks and 185 pages worth of comments later.
"I purchased what I thought was a top-of-the-line product only to be terribly disappointed," one user wrote Tuesday. "This is my first iPhone and may well be my last."
Battery life was a frequent complaint about the iPhone 3GS, but concerns about the phone's short battery life seemed to have been addressed on the next-generation iPhone 4.
According to Apple's official specs, the iPhone 4S should have enough juice in the battery for up to eight hours of talk time, six hours of Internet surfing, 10 hours of video viewing and 200 hours on standby. (All activities on a 3G connection -- 2G and wireless have different figures).
All of those numbers are within an hour or so of the iPhone 4, except for one. The older phone's specifications promise 300 hours of standby power: a full 50% more than the 4S.
Users complaining on the Apple forum and elsewhere say that their phones aren't lasting anywhere near even that reduced length of time. Various independent tests of the new phone have suggested that some phones have problems with poor battery life, while others don't.
The general consensus among tech-inclined owners is that the problem may not lie with the battery itself, but with the way the phone utilizes Apple's latest mobile operating system, iOS 5.
Specifically, the theory goes, its location-based services are a power drain. If the phone is constantly trying to pinpoint where it is, it will suck power even when the user isn't actively doing something with the phone. (For a comparison, think about how quickly your battery drains when you forget to turn off Wi-Fi searches while you're driving.)
The new phone also has a more powerful processor -- the same one that's in the iPad 2. That could cut battery life, even though Apple CEO Tim Cook specifically said that it wouldn't during the iPhone 4S unveiling event last month.
Few things I highlighted in bold.
First, no battery powered consumer device gets what the manufacturer rates it at. Even my MBA falls short of the rated time Apple lists, by a good 25%. It only comes close under ideal conditions, ie, with the LCD on its dimmest, no wireless on, etc. Complaining to Apple because your phone doesn't last as long as the spec sheet is idiotic and makes you look like an ignorant child.
Second, I know iOS users only recently got multitasking, so there might be a learning curve. But, all other smart phone platform users have learned full well that an app or service actively working in the background is going to suck battery power, often very quickly. Google Maps drains my T-bolt if I leave it running in the background with location services on, for example. Not sure if this is a similar situation with the 4S or not.
Third, the last bolded part. Apple stuck a powerful SoC into the 4S with the A5. The A5 & SGX543 may use less power at idle than the older A4, but at load, its going to use more power. There's simply more transistors and die that need to be powered up. For Apple to claim that it won't is ludicrous and for customers to believe him shows them to be naive.
Lastly, no where in the CNN article does it list any battery live lengths for the people who are complaining or compare it to the iP4. It only lists the official spec sheet for each. Regardless, I'm sure a 4S user is getting better battery life than my T-Bolt does, even heavily modded.
Any 4S users want to weigh in?