health care reform- what exactly are they proposing?

[chucky2]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: chucky2

Originally posted by: SammyJr

1. For the nickname Messiah to work, support for Obama would have to be on the level of "Yer either with us or again us." and its nowhere near that. A lot of liberals and liberal groups are displeased with him in that he's not progressive enough or that he's not being persuasive enough with the Blue Dogs. If a health plan passes without an immediate public option, Obama's approval will tank.

No, the Messiah nick's work fine because there are simply so many drinking the koolaid he p1sses out, and loving the taste of it...regardless of the differing flavors. You only have to go back through the threads around here around election time to witness the Obamanuts, their posts are right there to see.

2. Maybe I've missed it, but eits is only supporting one aspect of Obama's policies. I haven't seen him respond at all to any of the other issues. Contrast to a lot of Bush supporters where everything Bush wanted from abstinence education to War to tax cuts for the rich to the Prescription Drug plan was pure gold. These same ex-Bush supporters are now universally opposed to anything Obama does. I'll bet some of them have taken to corking their ass because they don't want to shit like no stinkin' Democrat.

If you've read enough P&N threads, and seen enough Eits comments, you'll know he's an Obamanut. Now, to be fair, he's not a jpeyton or a Mooner, or a Koolaid234, or a Macro...but he's a koolaid drinker one and the same. He's proved it himself in this thread by this line right here:

"being healthy isn't the new ipod or going green or the new networking website, yet... but that's what this administration is trying to do. they're trying to make it desirable to sweat, eat healthy, quit smoking, and live healthy. paying less taxes if you're healthy is one way of doing it. "

He actually believes this rather than the truth: They're p1ssing away money they took from us on sh1t that won't ever work - which they know - so they can dole out more pet project money to buy more votes. Period. Eits is either totally F'ing stupid, or, he knows this. If he knows this, and still advocates this, he's a Obamanut. Wihich one, who knows? Does it matter?

Chuck

What's with you guys with your fantasies about Obama sexing you up?

Errr...nothing sexual in my post unless you read it that way.

So since you read it that way, apperantly you've got an Obama sex fantasy? Yikes.....

Chuck

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: chucky2

Originally posted by: Red Dawn
No you got it from the other tree swingers here who got it from those two.

BTW I changed the name to protect the innocent..so you wouldn't be credited with posting that.

Entirely probable, but, since it so fits them, the name still applies. Sorry, them's the breaks...

Chuck

I know Tree Swingers does aptly describe you guys as in Monkey See Monkey Do and most of you do seem to suffer from Red Monkey butt.

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: chucky2
So since you read it that way, apperantly you've got an Obama sex fantasy? Yikes.....

Chuck

Ohhh!!!! Bamaaaa!!!!!:laugh:

 

[chucky2]

I don't know what's more interesting:

That you think I'm a Republican, or, that you can't comprehend the Obamanuts. That you get both of these wrong makes me think.....you're an Obamanut yourself.

Ohhh!!!! Bamaaaa!!!!!

Welp, that clears that up. You are an Obamanut....with that reference point, your posts now at least have a mad sense about them.

:thumbsup:

Chuck

 

[SammyJr]

Originally posted by: chucky2

Originally posted by: SammyJr

1. For the nickname Messiah to work, support for Obama would have to be on the level of "Yer either with us or again us." and its nowhere near that. A lot of liberals and liberal groups are displeased with him in that he's not progressive enough or that he's not being persuasive enough with the Blue Dogs. If a health plan passes without an immediate public option, Obama's approval will tank.

No, the Messiah nick's work fine because there are simply so many drinking the koolaid he p1sses out, and loving the taste of it...regardless of the differing flavors. You only have to go back through the threads around here around election time to witness the Obamanuts, their posts are right there to see.

Don't mistake relief that Bush was done and Palin was nowhere near the Presidency for overwhelming support of all of Obama's policies. And don't mistake post-election optimism for the same.

2. Maybe I've missed it, but eits is only supporting one aspect of Obama's policies. I haven't seen him respond at all to any of the other issues. Contrast to a lot of Bush supporters where everything Bush wanted from abstinence education to War to tax cuts for the rich to the Prescription Drug plan was pure gold. These same ex-Bush supporters are now universally opposed to anything Obama does. I'll bet some of them have taken to corking their ass because they don't want to shit like no stinkin' Democrat.

If you've read enough P&N threads, and seen enough Eits comments, you'll know he's an Obamanut. Now, to be fair, he's not a jpeyton or a Mooner, or a Koolaid234, or a Macro...but he's a koolaid drinker one and the same. He's proved it himself in this thread by this line right here:

"being healthy isn't the new ipod or going green or the new networking website, yet... but that's what this administration is trying to do. they're trying to make it desirable to sweat, eat healthy, quit smoking, and live healthy. paying less taxes if you're healthy is one way of doing it. "

Again, this is support of one aspect of Obama's policies. I haven't seen the kneejerk support worthy what you're suggesting.

He actually believes this rather than the truth: They're p1ssing away money they took from us on sh1t that won't ever work - which they know - so they can dole out more pet project money to buy more votes. Period. Eits is either totally F'ing stupid, or, he knows this. If he knows this, and still advocates this, he's a Obamanut. Wihich one, who knows? Does it matter?

And this part is pure Glen Beck pseudo-libertarian nonsense. Bet you weren't bitching like this during the last round of Bush tax cuts.

 

[chucky2]

Originally posted by: SammyJr

Originally posted by: chucky2

Originally posted by: SammyJr

1. For the nickname Messiah to work, support for Obama would have to be on the level of "Yer either with us or again us." and its nowhere near that. A lot of liberals and liberal groups are displeased with him in that he's not progressive enough or that he's not being persuasive enough with the Blue Dogs. If a health plan passes without an immediate public option, Obama's approval will tank.

No, the Messiah nick's work fine because there are simply so many drinking the koolaid he p1sses out, and loving the taste of it...regardless of the differing flavors. You only have to go back through the threads around here around election time to witness the Obamanuts, their posts are right there to see.

Don't mistake relief that Bush was done and Palin was nowhere near the Presidency for overwhelming support of all of Obama's policies. And don't mistake post-election optimism for the same.

Oh, there's no mistake. You simply need to go back and read the BDS type posts in the hundreds of threads and you'll see the BDS type mindset these people so employ. When Obama does the same things though, it's funny: They simply "disagree" with Obama, or they're 'not in favor of it'. Gone is the blathering insane ranting posts, the BDS name calling filled with vitrol, the songs written, etc. Why? Because they're Obamanuts...there's basically no other excuse, other than them being partisan hacks, but, hey, they self professed they weren't when Bush was running things...so what does that leave? Obamanut.

2. Maybe I've missed it, but eits is only supporting one aspect of Obama's policies. I haven't seen him respond at all to any of the other issues. Contrast to a lot of Bush supporters where everything Bush wanted from abstinence education to War to tax cuts for the rich to the Prescription Drug plan was pure gold. These same ex-Bush supporters are now universally opposed to anything Obama does. I'll bet some of them have taken to corking their ass because they don't want to shit like no stinkin' Democrat.

If you've read enough P&N threads, and seen enough Eits comments, you'll know he's an Obamanut. Now, to be fair, he's not a jpeyton or a Mooner, or a Koolaid234, or a Macro...but he's a koolaid drinker one and the same. He's proved it himself in this thread by this line right here:

"being healthy isn't the new ipod or going green or the new networking website, yet... but that's what this administration is trying to do. they're trying to make it desirable to sweat, eat healthy, quit smoking, and live healthy. paying less taxes if you're healthy is one way of doing it. "

Again, this is support of one aspect of Obama's policies. I haven't seen the kneejerk support worthy what you're suggesting.

Without doing a query of the existing threads, I can't point to a specific thread for a specific example. Safe to say with eits (and others) past postings when Bush was still around, and postings like this, I'm confident that eits is a koolaid drinker. Maybe not a full blown case, but, he at minimum sips. That's good enough for me, just like it was good enough for us that agreed with certain Bush policies (but not all) and were also labeled as such.

He actually believes this rather than the truth: They're p1ssing away money they took from us on sh1t that won't ever work - which they know - so they can dole out more pet project money to buy more votes. Period. Eits is either totally F'ing stupid, or, he knows this. If he knows this, and still advocates this, he's a Obamanut. Wihich one, who knows? Does it matter?

And this part is pure Glen Beck pseudo-libertarian nonsense. Bet you weren't bitching like this during the last round of Bush tax cuts.

I really don't care what you think it is, if eits, the Looney Left, and the Obamasiah get their way, that's exactly what will happen.

And why would I be arguing about tax cuts when there's no spending cuts? How about this: Quit spending so much, and then you can collect less taxes, so you want have to do tax cuts? Sound good?

Chuck

 

[StageLeft]

Thankfully now 21 or 22 democrats in the senate are saying this new tax they are proposing is just silly. Nice :

 

[BoberFett]

Originally posted by: eits
lol. I am the most ignorant person in the forums.

At least you're honest.