InfinitySquared
Member
- Mar 3, 2012
- 62
- 0
- 0
Sure, and using a map is better than sat nav, and horses are much better than cars, and flying will never catch on, and that stupid paper stuff, what are they thinking?! Don't even get me started on 'books'. :whiste:
Isn't over-engineer in this context really a kind way of saying badly engineer? A complex approach may solve a problem but if the same problem can be solved simply with a more reliable approach--as if finally figuring out the combination to a lock and everything comes into perspective--that is the better way to do it.
Overfill is a huge problem, yes.
The Cadillacs and Volts are built on the same line. Watch the video I posted above starting ~40 seconds in. Both cars are mixed together in several portions of the assembly line.Where they build the Cadillacs in that same facility it doesn't look anything like the pics of where they do the Volt. The Cadillac assembly area looks just as modern as any of the pics in of the VW and BMW in the OP.
Ultimate Factories.
Yeah, I've seen those shows too and the Corvette (ZR1 IIRC) assembly line looked pitiful compared to every other car manufacturer they've showcased and they showcased Porsche, Ferrari, Lamborghini, Mercedes, and even Ducati. The Ferrari factory is state of the art.
No wonder we can't build cars for shit!
The Cadillacs and Volts are built on the same line. Watch the video I posted above starting ~40 seconds in. Both cars are mixed together in several portions of the assembly line.
Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s3dZfvTLbBE#t=0m38s
I don't find the comparison very relevantI bet you can find a beautiful picture of a lamborghini production line and yet I bet you that GM has tweaked their manufacturing tighter than a niche manufacturer like lamborghini.
You kidding me? It's because in America people care about the badges. In fact, the Phaeton is better than probably 95% of "luxury branded" cars. The VW Phaeton is a bargain because it is basically a Bentley Continental GT/Flying Spur with VW badges. So your getting a 150k+ car for 80k.
http://jalopnik.com/254379/jalopnik-fantasy-garage-volkswagen-phaeton-w12
http://video.ultimatestreet.com/video/13953/the-new-volkswagen-phaeton (video of Top Gear review)
Each of those things you mentioned added significant usefulness. Basically, the user was now able to do something that was previously either impossible or much harder. Getting rid of dipsticks in favor of an electronic level sensor does not really provide any significant improvement to the user but it does increase complexity. More complexity means more cost and a higher likelihood that something will break over the lifetime of the car.
The best solutions only introduce complexity when there is no other way to achieve the goal. Complexity for complexity's sake is detrimental to the end user.
Each of those things you mentioned added significant usefulness. Basically, the user was now able to do something that was previously either impossible or much harder. Getting rid of dipsticks in favor of an electronic level sensor does not really provide any significant improvement to the user but it does increase complexity. More complexity means more cost and a higher likelihood that something will break over the lifetime of the car.
The best solutions only introduce complexity when there is no other way to achieve the goal. Complexity for complexity's sake is detrimental to the end user.
All of the foreign manufacturers seem to employ skilled and knowledgeable technicians. The american manufacturers look they just went to the metro area, grabbed a bunch of people from the bus hub, and gave them a wrench.
yes but most people wont ever check their own oil so the dipstick is mostly useless
its sad but rather true
I used to work as an engineer for GM. I had fun jobs at the Milford proving grounds and working on pre-production stuff in the small shops, but I put my time in with manufacturing support at Spring Hill, Pontiac, and Flint.
Even I think the picture of the Volt in the OP is a bit embarrassing. Although I think it's the angle, highlighting the plant columns / ceiling.
And yes, the work environment does affect the finished product. There are psychological aspects to it, and there are also pratical implications.
You are probably close to the truth.
I know in Germany at least, pupils are tracked into either pre-University or pre-vocational high schools. Upon graduating the latter, they then apply for apprenticeships (at the likes of BMW, etc.) where they learn the trade before being hired on. This vocational education starts at around age 10 and ends by around 25. Fifteen years of training should be good for something.
I don't see the reason why this is a bad thing, my car tells me when its low and exactly how much I need to add.
iDrive will even pull up autoparts stores or the closest dealer afterwards. One less thing that I have to do everyday gives more free time (that I have very little of anyway) to do something better with....like drive![]()
Thank you for making my point more eloquently!
And let's not even get started on the fact that the German plants are largely (if not completely) sustainable: renewable-energy powered, environmentally-safe painting processes, high use of recycled components, etc.
Re: Dresden VW Factory: Yes, I know it is a showcase money loser BUT do you all know the level of R&D it took to automate that place? Those wood floors are lined with magnets that allow trays of parts and tools to be tailored and delivered automatically to each specific car. The magnets in the floors also provide all the power to run the tools and vehicle assembly platforms. Not to mention the "just-in-time" tram network that delivers car parts to the factory from throughout the city and region. Think of the jobs and technologies that were created just to facilitate all that?
There is just a greater degree of forethought! The German factories I have visited (Germany, SC) allow the car to raise/lower/rotate to allow workers easier and more comfortable access to do their jobs. Can the Volt line do that?
Meanwhile, BMW invests millions to create a factory that is tailored for workers that are aged 50 or older.
Do the GM plants afford this same level of modularity? Do they have this kind of forethought? I think not.
I would also like to echo Steve Jobs who believed that what something looks like on the inside is equally important to what people see on the outside. His father taught him that, so he worked tirelessly to make sure the inside of the Apple II, Mac, etc. looked as flawless as it could.
A similar principle applies to what I am trying to address here.
Shit is only going to be as good as what you put in it. And this also applies to the investment and attention to detail given to the environments in which people are expected to produce great things.
I would also like to echo Steve Jobs who believed that what something looks like on the inside is equally important to what people see on the outside. His father taught him that, so he worked tirelessly to make sure the inside of the Apple II, Mac, etc. looked as flawless as it could.
