You're right. I'm sure the holocaust was entirely voluntary. There was no coercion, no force, no violence. Jewish people happily put down the guns they didn't have then went without a fight. And they never rose up after obtaining weapons.Is there any evidence that gun control led to the holocaust?
Interesting. Why shoot fascists when I could spend countless hours training in martial arts and hope that I'm not outnumbered 3 to 1 when they find me?It was derived from street-fighting skills developed by Slovakian-Israeli martial artist Imi Lichtenfeld, who made use of his training as a boxer and wrestler, as a means of defending the Jewish quarter against fascist groups in Bratislava[2] in the mid-to-late 1930s.
Interesting. Why shoot fascists when I could spend countless hours training in martial arts and hope that I'm not outnumbered 3 to 1 when they find me? I'm not even shocked by this stuff anymore. Every week I hear something new. Where do all of these stereotypes come from? Everybody automatically assumes that Jewish people are incapable of fighting or shooting guns. Not every Jew looks like Woody Allen. Comedian Andrew Dice Clay is Jewish. Those nightly raids by the SS would have been a lot harder if Jews were armed to the teeth. Imagine thousands of guys like Dice Clay carrying guns. I bet a lot of Soviets wished they had guns as well. The government should be afraid of the people, not the other way around.
As a Ukrainian Jew, I'm going to say yes. Do you know how many people have tried to kill us? Stalin tried to kill us in the 30's because we were Ukrainian. Hitler tried to kill us in the 40's because we were Jewish.
Show me 1 Jewish person who supports gun confiscation and I will show you a retarded person.
Svoboda, which was originally known by the Nazi-esque moniker Social-National Party of Ukraine and whose leader Oleh Tyahnybok is infamous for a 2004 speech in which he argued that a Moscow-Jewish mafia was ruling Ukraine, entered parliament for the first time in 2012 by winning 10.44 percent of the popular vote.
Some historians have accused the Ukrainian Insurgent Army of cooperating in the massacres of thousands of Ukrainian Jews during the Nazi occupation, and Tyahnybok even commended the rebels in 2004 for fighting Russians, Germans, Jewry and other crap. The Simon Wiesenthal Center put Svoboda at number five on its 2012 list of top anti-semitic slurs, citing Tyahnyboks Moscow-Jewish mafia comment and Miroshnychenko calling Ukrainian-born actress Mila Kunis a dirty Jewess.
Sure, if you just come out and say "Lets rumble." But hide some insurgents or rebels among the populace, and the professional military will be useless.
Also there will likely be a lot of patriots from the professional military force who would side with the armed civilians, and train them. There are a lot of veterans out there who are just as unhappy with government as the armed civilians and would have no problem jumping in.
As another has mentioned. Iraq was a blood bath. Our military was pretty clueless on how to handle it. It would have been worse if our enemy didn't fight among each other.
Add in a country 50x the size, and with no infighting, and IMHO smarter populace, and I'd hate to be our professional military. We don't have some impenetrable fortress. I'd imagine us being way weaker than most think and the government leads on.
Iraq was not a bloodbath. Do you realize what the kill ratios were? That doesn't mean that US deaths were not an unnecessary tragedy, but let's not fool ourselves here. The general estimates are about 4,500 US troops lost (total, including the invasion). Iraqi insurgent losses were estimated at about 5-6x that level, even including US casualties during the invasion. This is a silly exercise anyway, but the idea that Iraq was a 'bloodbath' is absurd by any normal estimates of battlefield casualties.
and were the us forces able to defeat the iraqi insurgents
Depends on what you mean by that. Again, this is a silly conversation as any possible conflict within the US would be insanely different than the conflict in Iraq. From my experience with gun enthusiasts in America I find it likely that many of them vastly overestimate their prospects.
Sure, if you just come out and say "Lets rumble." But hide some insurgents or rebels among the populace, and the professional military will be useless.
Also there will likely be a lot of patriots from the professional military force who would side with the armed civilians, and train them. There are a lot of veterans out there who are just as unhappy with government as the armed civilians and would have no problem jumping in.
As another has mentioned. Iraq was a blood bath. Our military was pretty clueless on how to handle it. It would have been worse if our enemy didn't fight among each other.
Add in a country 50x the size, and with no infighting, and IMHO smarter populace, and I'd hate to be our professional military. We don't have some impenetrable fortress. I'd imagine us being way weaker than most think and the government leads on.
and were the us forces able to defeat the iraqi insurgents
Yes. In every single battle that they engaged in. Same goes for Afghanistan. The casualty rates of the insurgents in Iraq and Afghanistan were astronomical. The most one sided warfare the world has ever seen. The better question is, were we able to defeat the insurgency? Not really, but that fault falls on the civilian leadership imposing restraints on the military, not military failure itself. Rest assured that if those civilian leaders themselves were in danger of being deposed or killed, they would impose no such restraints on the military defending them.
You're right. I'm sure the holocaust was entirely voluntary. There was no coercion, no force, no violence. Jewish people happily put down the guns they didn't have then went without a fight. And they never rose up after obtaining weapons.
you answered the question with a wholly unsuitable answer and then went on to elaborate with a wholly suitable answer.
meaning the second paragraph of your answer was the right one.
a basic tenet of war is knowing how to fight battles vs fighting the war
As a Ukrainian Jew, I'm going to say yes. Do you know how many people have tried to kill us? Stalin tried to kill us in the 30's because we were Ukrainian. Hitler tried to kill us in the 40's because we were Jewish.
Show me 1 Jewish person who supports gun confiscation and I will show you a retarded person.
Maybe Ukrainian Jews should get weapons now that antisemitic "protesters" are going around with a bad habit of throwing Molotov cocktails.Ukrainian synagogue reportedly firebombed in first violence against Jews
Umm, theres tons of jew liberals in big cities all over america that are trying to ban guns.
Oodles of them.
Knowing how is one thing, being allowed to is another. Not that I think you're any sort of authority on war. Unless you want to tell me which years you completed ILE, CGSC and\or the War College.
Maybe Ukrainian Jews should get weapons now that antisemitic "protesters" are going around with a bad habit of throwing Molotov cocktails.
so what about these russian protestors just wanting to protect their homes and culture
They should get weapons just in case armed thugs start coming from the west. Right now, the new "government" in Kiev is operating under threat of Maidan, so you are seeing these 300 to 0 votes even though the parliament has 440 seats and the pro EU parties are in a minority. No one wants to get lynched. Party of Regions offices have been attacked and firebombed too. So much for pro-democracy protesters.
so what about these russian protestors just wanting to protect their homes and culture
that synagogue was in southeast ukraine
