norseamd
Lifer
- Dec 13, 2013
- 13,990
- 180
- 106
getting guns from Russia?
what type of hardware are we talking about here
getting guns from Russia?
what type of hardware are we talking about here
The kind that goes pew-pew-pew.
Reminds me of that Chappelle skit where the black guy is a KKK leader. Now we have Jewish people supporting laws that were used to exterminate Jewish people.The Anti-Defamation League would be one:
http://archive.adl.org/civil_rights/2008_policy_priority/gun_control.html
As a Ukrainian Jew, I'm going to say yes. Do you know how many people have tried to kill us? Stalin tried to kill us in the 30's because we were Ukrainian. Hitler tried to kill us in the 40's because we were Jewish.
Show me 1 Jewish person who supports gun confiscation and I will show you a retarded person.
Reminds me of that Chappelle skit where the black guy is a KKK leader. Now we have Jewish people supporting laws that were used to exterminate Jewish people.
Where are you gun nuts getting the idea that your guns are there to "protect" you from the government? If the government wanted to tried to take your guns they would succeed. You and your bushmaster rifle are not equivalent to an MP. You and your drunk buddies are not a platoon and you and your gun club are not a company.
Indians tried to kill us because we are Americans. The Germans tried to kill us because we are american, The Japanese tried to kill us because we are american, heck the Taliban is trying to kill us because we are Americans.
Where are you gun nuts getting the idea that your guns are there to "protect" you from the government? If the government wanted to tried to take your guns they would succeed. You and your bushmaster rifle are not equivalent to an MP. You and your drunk buddies are not a platoon and you and your gun club are not a company.
all depends on context i suppose.
more or less this is russia smuggling arms into eastern ukraine but there might be valid reasons for it if the pro western ukrainians start to attack pro russian ukrainians. on the other hand it could be used to arm a population for civil war and that would be worrying. the us and western europe should probably start to consider running firearms into western and central ukraine also.
also the keyword is "hardware"
so what exactly are they smuggling
hope they just go pew pew pew pew
Where are you gun nuts getting the idea that your guns are there to "protect" you from the government? If the government wanted to tried to take your guns they would succeed. You and your bushmaster rifle are not equivalent to an MP. You and your drunk buddies are not a platoon and you and your gun club are not a company.
I am talking about AK's.
Lets have a serious discussion on the recent uprising in the Ukraine and how it could affect the future of gun control debates here in the US.
There are videos and pictures out of Ukraine showing government troops and snipers killing unarmed citizens. How long before the memes start showing up comparing ousted President Viktor Yanukovych to diane feinstein?
Or will these current events be forgotten about?
Anyone want to bet whether the images coming out of the Ukraine will be used to fight any new gun control laws?
Thank you.
For the most part I feel that anti-gun people are sincere in their actions. They honestly feel they are going to prevent the next sandy hook.
But on the other side of the coin, restrictive gun control enables oppressive governments.
My opinion, if we had universal health care and the mentally ill received the help they needed, a lot of our gun crime would go away.
Where are you gun nuts getting the idea that your guns are there to "protect" you from the government? If the government wanted to tried to take your guns they would succeed. You and your bushmaster rifle are not equivalent to an MP. You and your drunk buddies are not a platoon and you and your gun club are not a company.
and if the us and western european countries start to bring guns into western and central ukraine?
According to wiki, if you count reserves, the Us military has a total of 2.2M people in it.
Compared that to the "adult" class of citizen (ages 15-64, that I'd consider able to fight in a conflict) of a total of 205M... And the citizens outnumber the military ~10:1.
Unless the gov't is going to literally obliterate everything, I don't think it would be so simple.
Reminds me of that Chappelle skit where the black guy is a KKK leader. Now we have Jewish people supporting laws that were used to exterminate Jewish people.
Granted, that is if it just went all super police state overnight, rather than gradually erode our freedoms until we wake up and it's 1984.
Generally, I am against anything TH posts, but the OP title is a good question. The spirit of the 2nd amendment was for precisely what is happening in Ukraine right now. I think that "fear" is going to play a large part in the continuing gun control debate.
What's happening in Ukraine is essentially undoing of Communinsm and Tzar rule. Many Americans think that Communism was abolished back 2 decades ago........it wasn't. Label changes changed very little for some of these countries.......and they have simply returned to Tzar/Monarchy type rule (Russia is a good example). And after the whole "end of communism" came the entire "it's ok now" thing with China. It's funny how US (and Russia) risked the whole world in the name of "cold war" aka "communism".....when a decade later Communists are our biggest business partners. You see my friends, entire Cold War was simply "fought" because Russia would not put up with US policy and would no let US/Corps take over their resources/be part of their agenda..... I won't even get into the fact that entire Eastern Europe was left for Russia after WW2 (which should've never happened). Lot of these countries were not "liberated" until MANY years after WW2. Heck Ukraine is STILL trying to liberate from Communism/Tzar rule..... Vdubchaos is online now Report Post
Boy if everyone was able to participate in an armed uprising of their own, there wouldn't be anarchy? Wouldn't divided countries with a lot of guns be in a constant state of civil war? Oh yeah, there are many countries in the Middle East and Africa that fit that description perfectly. More guns are the answer?
Some of the protesters had deadly weapons and stormed military positions, which helped prompt the violent reaction. Do you think if a lot or most of them were armed and shooting, the military wouldn't have come back with much more than snipers?
The relative peacefulness of the protest is what made it successful.
Why do some people think the answer to problems of violence is more guns? Geez!
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...sts-ask-what-if-ukrainians-had-more-guns.html
Where are you gun nuts getting the idea that your guns are there to "protect" you from the government? If the government wanted to tried to take your guns they would succeed. You and your bushmaster rifle are not equivalent to an MP. You and your drunk buddies are not a platoon and you and your gun club are not a company.
I don't think people understand the connection between gun control and government tyranny.
I think you're delusional if you think the US govt tries to confiscate all guns tomorrow and it will succeed.
