Originally posted by: TheVrolok
I just wrote a thread about this on another forum a few hours ago. Like brikis98 said, if you can't bench XXX without full ROM, you can't bench XXX. Period. That's it. "Half-benching" may as well be not at all benching. It reminds me of the good old college days of lifting .. all the male boasting on the dorm floor, "Yeah man, I can bench XXX no problem, I thought you'd be stronger than me since your so much bigger.. blah blah blah." "Alright, let's go find out." First guy then proceeds to move the bar an entiretly of 12 inches, 6 down, 6 up. So I bust his balls a bit, he tries it again, it gets to his chest and then doesn't move in an inch. :roll:
Originally posted by: presidentender
Originally posted by: brikis98
Originally posted by: presidentender
Originally posted by: brikis98
In short, never accept anything less than full range of motion in any exercise.
But those guys who squat 300 lbs for, like, six inches! And those other guys, who curl between 90 degrees and the top instead of going all the way down! And those guys who bring the bar only partway down when benching! Wait, are you saying they're doing it wrong? *gasp*
you forgot to mention the case where the guy is benching 300lbs for 6 inches... while his spotter is shrugging it for 6 inches. nothing like teamwork in the weight room.
My favorite is teamwork on squats. I've only seen it once. They did a set of ten, with 225. I don't think the one who was supposed to be lifting got a single rep on his own.
Almost as good is the dude I saw on Wednesday at the gym. Rolled into the gym with his belt already on (of course), walked over to the Smith Machine (of course). Threw on 225, did 4 speed squats (didn't even get close to parallel, maybe he hit 45 degrees?). Then 315, 2 reps, same awful depth (THIS time he rapped up his knees tho!), then 405 for 1, with belt, knee wraps, and 45 degree depth. WTF are people doing?