Half bench

oddyager

Diamond Member
May 21, 2005
3,398
0
76
I typically do a full bench (lift bar, bring down and tap chest and then push back up) on my routines but when I start doing reps with heavier weights I tend to mix it up with half bench. My arms are long and when I bring down my maximum bench (right now I'm up to 315) my chest really gets punished from the stretching. It's true that if you half bench that isn't your true bench but I feel the exercise works fine for me and it helps build a comfort level with that weight you are doing so you can go to a full bench.

 
Mar 22, 2002
10,483
32
81
It doesn't really work you fine. It sets you up for weakness and injury due to the lack of of range of motion. Do the full bench. If you have to go lighter, go lighter. The overall weight doesn't matter. It matters that you're doing it right, minimizing your risk of injury, and that you're not setting yourself up for a mishap later.
 

rasczak

Lifer
Jan 29, 2005
10,437
23
81
Originally posted by: oddyager
I typically do a full bench (lift bar, bring down and tap chest and then push back up) on my routines but when I start doing reps with heavier weights I tend to mix it up with half bench. My arms are long and when I bring down my maximum bench (right now I'm up to 315) my chest really gets punished from the stretching. It's true that if you half bench that isn't your true bench but I feel the exercise works fine for me and it helps build a comfort level with that weight you are doing so you can go to a full bench.

when you say half bench what do you mean exactly?
 

glenn beck

Platinum Member
Oct 6, 2004
2,380
0
0
Originally posted by: rasczak
Originally posted by: oddyager
I typically do a full bench (lift bar, bring down and tap chest and then push back up) on my routines but when I start doing reps with heavier weights I tend to mix it up with half bench. My arms are long and when I bring down my maximum bench (right now I'm up to 315) my chest really gets punished from the stretching. It's true that if you half bench that isn't your true bench but I feel the exercise works fine for me and it helps build a comfort level with that weight you are doing so you can go to a full bench.

when you say half bench what do you mean exactly?

negatives
 

brikis98

Diamond Member
Jul 5, 2005
7,253
8
0
If you can't bench 315 with a full range of motion, you can't bench 315. Period. If you do it only half way, nothing good will come of it. The top part of the motion uses primarily triceps and shoulders for lockout, so your chest won't be involved much. Instead, you'll just be putting tons of extra stress on the rotator cuff, which is a really quick way to injure it.

In short, never accept anything less than full range of motion in any exercise. Not only are you making the exercise less effective, but you are also setting yourself up to get hurt.
 

presidentender

Golden Member
Jan 23, 2008
1,166
0
76
Originally posted by: brikis98
In short, never accept anything less than full range of motion in any exercise.

But those guys who squat 300 lbs for, like, six inches! And those other guys, who curl between 90 degrees and the top instead of going all the way down! And those guys who bring the bar only partway down when benching! Wait, are you saying they're doing it wrong? *gasp*
 

brikis98

Diamond Member
Jul 5, 2005
7,253
8
0
Originally posted by: presidentender
Originally posted by: brikis98
In short, never accept anything less than full range of motion in any exercise.

But those guys who squat 300 lbs for, like, six inches! And those other guys, who curl between 90 degrees and the top instead of going all the way down! And those guys who bring the bar only partway down when benching! Wait, are you saying they're doing it wrong? *gasp*

you forgot to mention the case where the guy is benching 300lbs for 6 inches... while his spotter is shrugging it for 6 inches. nothing like teamwork in the weight room.
 

presidentender

Golden Member
Jan 23, 2008
1,166
0
76
Originally posted by: brikis98
Originally posted by: presidentender
Originally posted by: brikis98
In short, never accept anything less than full range of motion in any exercise.

But those guys who squat 300 lbs for, like, six inches! And those other guys, who curl between 90 degrees and the top instead of going all the way down! And those guys who bring the bar only partway down when benching! Wait, are you saying they're doing it wrong? *gasp*

you forgot to mention the case where the guy is benching 300lbs for 6 inches... while his spotter is shrugging it for 6 inches. nothing like teamwork in the weight room.

My favorite is teamwork on squats. I've only seen it once. They did a set of ten, with 225. I don't think the one who was supposed to be lifting got a single rep on his own.
 

TheVrolok

Lifer
Dec 11, 2000
24,254
4,092
136
I just wrote a thread about this on another forum a few hours ago. Like brikis98 said, if you can't bench XXX without full ROM, you can't bench XXX. Period. That's it. "Half-benching" may as well be not at all benching. It reminds me of the good old college days of lifting .. all the male boasting on the dorm floor, "Yeah man, I can bench XXX no problem, I thought you'd be stronger than me since your so much bigger.. blah blah blah." "Alright, let's go find out." First guy then proceeds to move the bar an entiretly of 12 inches, 6 down, 6 up. So I bust his balls a bit, he tries it again, it gets to his chest and then doesn't move in an inch. :roll:

Originally posted by: presidentender
Originally posted by: brikis98
Originally posted by: presidentender
Originally posted by: brikis98
In short, never accept anything less than full range of motion in any exercise.

But those guys who squat 300 lbs for, like, six inches! And those other guys, who curl between 90 degrees and the top instead of going all the way down! And those guys who bring the bar only partway down when benching! Wait, are you saying they're doing it wrong? *gasp*

you forgot to mention the case where the guy is benching 300lbs for 6 inches... while his spotter is shrugging it for 6 inches. nothing like teamwork in the weight room.

My favorite is teamwork on squats. I've only seen it once. They did a set of ten, with 225. I don't think the one who was supposed to be lifting got a single rep on his own.

Almost as good is the dude I saw on Wednesday at the gym. Rolled into the gym with his belt already on (of course), walked over to the Smith Machine (of course). Threw on 225, did 4 speed squats (didn't even get close to parallel, maybe he hit 45 degrees?). Then 315, 2 reps, same awful depth (THIS time he rapped up his knees tho!), then 405 for 1, with belt, knee wraps, and 45 degree depth. WTF are people doing?
 

HN

Diamond Member
Jan 19, 2001
8,186
4
0
Originally posted by: brikis98
Originally posted by: presidentender
Originally posted by: brikis98
In short, never accept anything less than full range of motion in any exercise.

But those guys who squat 300 lbs for, like, six inches! And those other guys, who curl between 90 degrees and the top instead of going all the way down! And those guys who bring the bar only partway down when benching! Wait, are you saying they're doing it wrong? *gasp*

you forgot to mention the case where the guy is benching 300lbs for 6 inches... while his spotter is shrugging it for 6 inches. nothing like teamwork in the weight room.

teamwork on curls is the best...THE BEST; especially in the squat cage for safety!!!!
 

wheresmybacon

Diamond Member
Sep 10, 2004
3,899
1
76
Originally posted by: TheVrolok
I just wrote a thread about this on another forum a few hours ago. Like brikis98 said, if you can't bench XXX without full ROM, you can't bench XXX. Period. That's it. "Half-benching" may as well be not at all benching. It reminds me of the good old college days of lifting .. all the male boasting on the dorm floor, "Yeah man, I can bench XXX no problem, I thought you'd be stronger than me since your so much bigger.. blah blah blah." "Alright, let's go find out." First guy then proceeds to move the bar an entiretly of 12 inches, 6 down, 6 up. So I bust his balls a bit, he tries it again, it gets to his chest and then doesn't move in an inch. :roll:

Originally posted by: presidentender
Originally posted by: brikis98
Originally posted by: presidentender
Originally posted by: brikis98
In short, never accept anything less than full range of motion in any exercise.

But those guys who squat 300 lbs for, like, six inches! And those other guys, who curl between 90 degrees and the top instead of going all the way down! And those guys who bring the bar only partway down when benching! Wait, are you saying they're doing it wrong? *gasp*

you forgot to mention the case where the guy is benching 300lbs for 6 inches... while his spotter is shrugging it for 6 inches. nothing like teamwork in the weight room.

My favorite is teamwork on squats. I've only seen it once. They did a set of ten, with 225. I don't think the one who was supposed to be lifting got a single rep on his own.

Almost as good is the dude I saw on Wednesday at the gym. Rolled into the gym with his belt already on (of course), walked over to the Smith Machine (of course). Threw on 225, did 4 speed squats (didn't even get close to parallel, maybe he hit 45 degrees?). Then 315, 2 reps, same awful depth (THIS time he rapped up his knees tho!), then 405 for 1, with belt, knee wraps, and 45 degree depth. WTF are people doing?

The 45-degree range of motion with squats is an epidemic. My favorite thing I've seen so far is there's a trainer @ my new gym who does it. What the hell is that even doing? Why even waste your time...
 

brikis98

Diamond Member
Jul 5, 2005
7,253
8
0

crt1530

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2001
3,194
0
0
I thought about posting something, but everything seems to have been covered.

To the OP: lulz
 

SearchMaster

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2002
7,791
114
106
Originally posted by: BeauJangles
Bad Bench - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...Ig2s8k&feature=related
Awful, AWFUL deadlifts - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...2Un_8I&feature=related

Hilarious Kid - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...RTpMN8&feature=related ... I actually feel bad for him.

No joke, my 5 year old can bench 75 pounds. I don't let my kids lift weights often, and for him to do that I have to stabilize the bar (but not help lift), but he's incredibly strong for his age. I'm not about to let him try but I'm quite sure he could deadlift 100.
 

BeauJangles

Lifer
Aug 26, 2001
13,941
1
0
Originally posted by: SearchMaster
Originally posted by: BeauJangles
Bad Bench - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...Ig2s8k&feature=related
Awful, AWFUL deadlifts - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...2Un_8I&feature=related

Hilarious Kid - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...RTpMN8&feature=related ... I actually feel bad for him.

No joke, my 5 year old can bench 75 pounds. I don't let my kids lift weights often, and for him to do that I have to stabilize the bar (but not help lift), but he's incredibly strong for his age. I'm not about to let him try but I'm quite sure he could deadlift 100.

Hey, I have no problem with letting your kid lift a bit. I thought the video was horrible because he became such spectacle and acted like he was some big tough guy. I'm not blaming the kid, I think it's terrible parenting.
 

KoolDrew

Lifer
Jun 30, 2004
10,226
7
81
Has anybody here ever heard of board presses? What about rack pulls? Essentially both are considered only part of the actual movement (bench and deadlift, respectively), but are widely regarded as great exercises to bring up weak points.
 

TheVrolok

Lifer
Dec 11, 2000
24,254
4,092
136
Originally posted by: KoolDrew
Has anybody here ever heard of board presses? What about rack pulls? Essentially both are considered only part of the actual movement (bench and deadlift, respectively), but are widely regarded as great exercises to bring up weak points.

Absolutely have heard of (and done) board presses and rack pulls. These are VERY different than shitty form. There is a purpose to boards and rack pulls, like you've said. It's not the same as throwing on more weight than you can handle and not completing the proper exercise.
 

deamer44

Guest
May 25, 2008
168
0
0
by half rep do you mean getting your shoulders at right angles, if so thats the correct form. by allowing the bar too go right down to your chest your just putting un-nessesary strain on your joints.
 

BeauJangles

Lifer
Aug 26, 2001
13,941
1
0
Originally posted by: deamer44
by half rep do you mean getting your shoulders at right angles, if so thats the correct form. by allowing the bar too go right down to your chest your just putting un-nessesary strain on your joints.

If you're trying to say that the bar should basically be over your neck, that's incorrect and dangerous.
 

crt1530

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2001
3,194
0
0
Originally posted by: deamer44
by half rep do you mean getting your shoulders at right angles, if so thats the correct form. by allowing the bar too go right down to your chest your just putting un-nessesary strain on your joints.

Please refrain from giving advice on subjects which you know nothing about.
 

TheVrolok

Lifer
Dec 11, 2000
24,254
4,092
136
Originally posted by: crt1530
Originally posted by: deamer44
by half rep do you mean getting your shoulders at right angles, if so thats the correct form. by allowing the bar too go right down to your chest your just putting un-nessesary strain on your joints.

Please refrain from giving advice on subjects which you know nothing about.

This.