'Hail Trump!': White Nationalists Salute the President Elect

[Victorian Gray]

Remains to be seen whether they're actually clever. A trillion dollar handout might just prove in their interests.

I'm actually referring to the Democrats and independents (like blankslate) who ate up Republican propaganda for the past few decades and who essentially walked away from this election because "both sides do it" and "Clinton is the Anti-Christ".

Republicans spent decades delegitimizing government and the political process and demonizing the Democratic Party. I think their political control of the US at present shows that they've been pretty successful.

 

[HamburgerBoy]

Lol that is not the example you want to bring as an argument against the Alt-Right. Do you know anything about Milo other than his sexual preference?

You mean having the audacity to call a person an illiterate? What a hate crime!

I mean, I think Milo is a troll and has very little of value beyond entertainment, but what do you know about him?

 

[BonzaiDuck]

Your first sentence puzzled me; the second one made it clear.

The Righties don't believe in science -- it's all about "belief."

I don't believe the rank-and-file believe in mass-psychology, the existence of psy-war and propaganda campaigns. Breitbart (RIP? Rot in hell!) and Bannon most certainly do.

I don't even believe the "Liberals" or Democrats really understood all of this. The failure to embrace it as a reality is due to several degradations in the national character:

"I'm special. I'm a victim."
"I'm smart. I'm an individual. If I were being lied to, I'd know it immediately."
"It's the Liberal Media!"

You don't need to own the media or have a "liberal" agenda to create and manufacture the event, dropping a stone into the water to make waves. If there is distortion -- liberal or conservative -- in the media, you should be able to recognize it and distinguish opinion from outright distortion and determine what is fact and what isn't.

If you want to know the facts, you can still get the facts from the media if you take the time to look at different sources, make inferences and conclusions.

Nobody I've heard in focus groups, in rallies, in the GOP debates seems capable of doing that.

We live in a narcissistic culture. What came home in WWII is day-ud! It's day-ud! What we have here is an angry bunch of sissies with pitchforks and torches. You could tell them anything, and they would believe it if it supported their core beliefs, and you could somehow make them think it wasn't coming from the "Lamestream media."

They got all their ideas about Hillary from the Media. Now they whine that the Media is "out to destroy Trump."

 

[LegendKiller]

http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2016/12/02/hate-hoax-black-man-arrested-racist-nazi-trump-graffiti/

Huh

 

[imported_tajmahal]

ooh, so 200 racist nutjobs like the fact that Trump was elected. Oh, the horror, it's obviously his fault. We need to get rid of him immediately and replace him with the lying scumbag illary, that will fix everything.

I bet about 1/4 of those at the conference are either FBI agents or informers.

 

[raildogg]

It's weird how the media has been making race baiting stories ever since Obama came into power. It doesn't matter if they are leftists or righties. It's all a bunch of BS.

How did this country suddenly turn so different after Obama came into power? Where was the the supposed "outrage" before? Why now?

Just like the Trump people want to close the borders now and stop illegals now. What happened 10 years ago? What strange times we live in.

By the way, the racial strife is being made something more than it is by the media. They have an interest in public unrest. Keep that in mind whenever you see race baiting news stories. (This is not to deny racial injustice or any of that).

 

[HamburgerBoy]

Race stuff has always been an issue, but it was never taken quite as seriously in the peaceful period between the Rodney King riots up to Obama's term. Often because it was made comical by the people talking about it (e.g. Jackson/Sharpton, or "Bush doesn't care about black people" Kanye). I think it was really the Zimmerman case that brought it to its current glory. There was already long precedent from Nancy Grace & co for jumping on the accused and sensationalizing any local crime to an international spectacle, but until Trayvon Martin, it was usually always a female white victim, either of murder or rape. Initial reports of this angelic 13 year old boy ruthlessly murdered in cold blood by a redneck uttering "Fucking c**ns" was a great start, and Obama and the DOJ taking the bait legitimized it. Give it a bit of time to stew and a not guilty verdict, and voila, Black Lives Matter, a brand new generation of young, race-centric trolls is born. I think it will calm down again sooner than later, but with Trump around, who knows.

 

[raildogg]

Yes, I see what your saying. I don't recall the media jumping on the race issue so much in the past. Yes there have been a few stories but not like the bombardment we see today. It almost seems unreal.

It is weird to see two Presidents at the opposites when it comes to this issue. If it weren't "real" one could say it was all staged. I mean, you have Obama who plays the part of someone sympathetic to the race cause; on the other side, you have Trump who seems to be dismissive of it. So you have two people pulling at the emotions of two opposing viewpoints of the same issue. Wow.

But it fits with the media narrative of a so-called divided nation - the whites vs everyone else. Obama and Trump fit in perfectly with this story.

America once again gets what it deserves.

 

[LegendKiller]

Race stuff has always been an issue, but it was never taken quite as seriously in the peaceful period between the Rodney King riots up to Obama's term. Often because it was made comical by the people talking about it (e.g. Jackson/Sharpton, or "Bush doesn't care about black people" Kanye). I think it was really the Zimmerman case that brought it to its current glory. There was already long precedent from Nancy Grace & co for jumping on the accused and sensationalizing any local crime to an international spectacle, but until Trayvon Martin, it was usually always a female white victim, either of murder or rape. Initial reports of this angelic 13 year old boy ruthlessly murdered in cold blood by a redneck uttering "Fucking c**ns" was a great start, and Obama and the DOJ taking the bait legitimized it. Give it a bit of time to stew and a not guilty verdict, and voila, Black Lives Matter, a brand new generation of young, race-centric trolls is born. I think it will calm down again sooner than later, but with Trump around, who knows.

They intentionally set a false narrative. The initial pictures of Trayvon were his older pictures. Then they got their pr person, the same one browns parents got, and magically he becomes this innocent little kid. The younger picture is circulated, false narratives about "c**ns" created, and a new race, white hispanic conjured out of thin air. Our white black president says it could have been his kid and suddenly you have a magical race situation.
Now the story I linked above. I told people that pretty much all of these swastika things were hoaxes. That is being proven correct.

Democrats are racializing everything they can. It's the only way they can win.

 

[raildogg]

Please don't also fall victim to the Democrat vs Republican trap.

You already said we have a certain narrative created by the media and their owners. We can see it on TV. We can also see it is still happening despite Trump now becoming President. In fact, the race baiting might increase under Trump. So the narrative is not about Democrats or Republicans after all.

It's just an issue to always keep things simmering (so to speak). To always keep the masses fighting each other and to be distrustful of each other.

 

[Vic]

They intentionally set a false narrative. The initial pictures of Trayvon were his older pictures. Then they got their pr person, the same one browns parents got, and magically he becomes this innocent little kid. The younger picture is circulated, false narratives about "c**ns" created, and a new race, white hispanic conjured out of thin air. Our white black president says it could have been his kid and suddenly you have a magical race situation.
Now the story I linked above. I told people that pretty much all of these swastika things were hoaxes. That is being proven correct.

Democrats are racializing everything they can. It's the only way they can win.

I suppose the headlines could have been truthful and read "Student stalked and killed in front of his own house."

 

[imported_tajmahal]

I suppose the headlines could have been truthful and read "Student stalked and killed in front of his own house."

The dumb ass attacked a guy with a gun and learned in his last few seconds what a bad idea it was.

 

[HamburgerBoy]

I suppose the headlines could have been truthful and read "Student stalked and killed in front of his own house."

Or "Man shoots and kills in self-defense as allowed by local law".

 

[Vic]

The dumb ass attacked a guy with a gun and learned in his last few seconds what a bad idea it was.

A guy with a gun who had been stalking him as he walked lawfully through his own neighborhood.

 

[Vic]

Or "Man shoots and kills in self-defense as allowed by local law".

What do you believe the headlines would have looked like if Zimmerman were black and Martin were white? What do you believe the legal outcome would have been to Zimmerman in that case, all else being equal? Where do you believe that the bickering internet sides would have been drawn?
LK said that the Democrats are racializing politics. But a simple objective observation of the circumstances, by doing more than reversing the roles, shows where the real racializing is occurring.

 

[Vic]

Cmon people, a cop shot a black man 8 times in the back while he was running away, the entire world has seen the video and agrees that it was murder, and he's going to get off for it. And the usual suspects will cheer the verdict. If it's not racism, well.. that's even worse.

 

[LegendKiller]

Cmon people, a cop shot a black man 8 times in the back while he was running away, the entire world has seen the video and agrees that it was murder, and he's going to get off for it. And the usual suspects will cheer the verdict. If it's not racism, well.. that's even worse.

Yeah, after it has been proven by marks on his clothing that the guy had and used the cops tazer and was struggling with him before the cop took his gun out.

The us supreme Court has given cops a lot of leeway for killing people who would assault and or kill a cop if they have shown to have done it.

If you want to try and incapacitate or kill a cop you have no reason to expect to live.

 

[LegendKiller]

A guy with a gun who had been stalking him as he walked lawfully through his own neighborhood.

Not stalking. Also, anybody has a right to check things out. I know pantie clad liberal cucks don't want any right to self protection and personal freedom but at least the constitution still protects it.

 

[LegendKiller]

I suppose the headlines could have been truthful and read "Student stalked and killed in front of his own house."

Except he wasn't in front of his house. Jeantel proved that. He went back out to stalk Zimmerman. He sought out and got into a fight, as he was known to do, and died for it. Why was he there anyway? Ohh yewh, because he had been suspended from school for being a punk.

 

[HamburgerBoy]

What do you believe the headlines would have looked like if Zimmerman were black and Martin were white? What do you believe the legal outcome would have been to Zimmerman in that case, all else being equal? Where do you believe that the bickering internet sides would have been drawn?
LK said that the Democrats are racializing politics. But a simple objective observation of the circumstances, by doing more than reversing the roles, shows where the real racializing is occurring.

There probably wouldn't have been headlines because it wouldn't have been news. See: Roderick Scott, a black man who was being threatened by three white punks, shooting and killing one in self-defense. Because New York lacks the self-defense protections that redder states provide, he was charged with murder, but ultimately acquitted. The white family of the dead punk whined about guns and vigilantism and etc, but no one gave them national news time because no one cared.

 

[Vic]

Yeah, after it has been proven by marks on his clothing that the guy had and used the cops tazer and was struggling with him before the cop took his gun out.

The us supreme Court has given cops a lot of leeway for killing people who would assault and or kill a cop if they have shown to have done it.

If you want to try and incapacitate or kill a cop you have no reason to expect to live.

Was he using the cop's taser or struggling with the officer at the time he was shot?
You see, the problem here is that you're just a fucking liar.

 

[LegendKiller]

Was he using the cop's taser or struggling with the officer at the time he was shot?
You see, the problem here is that you're just a fucking liar.

The cop had tazer marks on his clothes. It was in his hands. It ended up *behind* them but wasn't in any other frame before. So how'd it get there? Because he had it, used it, and the cop was able to get it away from him.

The thing was mishandled by the da and not tested for dna. Why?

This is nothing different than fuckheads like you claiming brown was running away when everything proved he wasn't. His shoe he lost was behind him. So how could it be behind him if he was running away?

Or how about philando castile. There you have s guy who had a gun in his lap, out of the holster, next to his wallet. Girlfriend claims there was nothing, but video evidence shows it is there.

You fall for this shit like a retard. Shame on you.

 

[Vic]

Not stalking. Also, anybody has a right to check things out. I know pantie clad liberal cucks don't want any right to self protection and personal freedom but at least the constitution still protects it.

And you keep lying. I absolutely support the right to self defense and the Constitution and own guns too. But you'll lie about that too. Because being a tough guy on the internet is more important to you than the truth.

 

[LegendKiller]

And you keep lying. I absolutely support the right to self defense and the Constitution and own guns too. But you'll lie about that too. Because being a tough guy on the internet is more important to you than the truth.

Then you should be fine with Zimmerman. He had every right to be where he was. He had every right to defend himself from a violent person.

 

[LegendKiller]

Was he using the cop's taser or struggling with the officer at the time he was shot?
You see, the problem here is that you're just a fucking liar.

It doesn't matter. Case law has already shown that if an officer has a belief the assailant is a threat to society he can be shot.

Assaulting and trying to incapacitate an officer is being a threat to society.