- Oct 10, 2006
- 21,562
- 3
- 0
Is there any major difference? (assuming all other factors are as equal as they can get)
Reason I ask is that I'm finally getting to the point where I'm looking to buy my first gun, primarily for concealed carry purposes. Given the current ammo shortage (that has no signs of letting up) the most affordable ammo I could buy is FMJ. My only firearm experience being 20 rounds with a bolt action .22 back in 6th grade, I imagine I'll need a shitload of trigger time to actually get decent with whatever I pick up. However for actual carry purposes I'd prefer HPs.
As for the gun itself: after some research those new S&W Bodyguard .380s look (in a general and literal sense) kickass, and price isn't much of an object. So I'll probably wait for those to hit the market and, assuming they pan out in the reviews, place an order. I know going with .380 limits me even further as far as ammo goes, but I want something that I can comfortably stick in a pocket or fanny pack if I have to, and from what I hear .380 has slightly lower recoil which could be advantageous.
Reason I ask is that I'm finally getting to the point where I'm looking to buy my first gun, primarily for concealed carry purposes. Given the current ammo shortage (that has no signs of letting up) the most affordable ammo I could buy is FMJ. My only firearm experience being 20 rounds with a bolt action .22 back in 6th grade, I imagine I'll need a shitload of trigger time to actually get decent with whatever I pick up. However for actual carry purposes I'd prefer HPs.
As for the gun itself: after some research those new S&W Bodyguard .380s look (in a general and literal sense) kickass, and price isn't much of an object. So I'll probably wait for those to hit the market and, assuming they pan out in the reviews, place an order. I know going with .380 limits me even further as far as ammo goes, but I want something that I can comfortably stick in a pocket or fanny pack if I have to, and from what I hear .380 has slightly lower recoil which could be advantageous.
Last edited: