shiner
Lifer
- Jul 18, 2000
- 17,112
- 1
- 0
Well, I'm for laws against the deranged owning any guns.
Good to see you're policing yourself.
Kudos to you!
Well, I'm for laws against the deranged owning any guns.
No...you're just not seeing everything because it wouldn't all fit in that particular safe.![]()
So are 99.99% of all gun owners.
Much like some other right0wing ideologues, drebo says things that are untrue.
Well, I'm for laws against the deranged owning any guns.
So you're going to tell me that the same people who are trying to force "healthcare reform" down our throats DIDN'T build in exclusions specifically for they and theirs?
And that Obama's motorcade (which he's used VERY liberally, I might add) doesn't produce more greenhouse gasses in one trip than most people will produce in their entire lives, while at the same time arguing for cap and trade and other "carbon cuttin measures"?
You really are out of touch.
(This is not to say that people on the other side of the fence don't do this...both do...which is why special interest groups need to be abolished...except for my special interest group supporting the abolition of special interest groups, of course)
Good to see you're policing yourself.
Kudos to you!
None of them! They should be left to me for er....safekeepingSo which of the firearms in this picture should I be allowed to own?
![]()
Wow...you really need to lighten up.How embarrassing for you to post that.
Wow...you really need to lighten up.
So of course, Craig dodges Shiner's question.
As long as you don't have access to pickle jars it's all good :thumbsup:So which of the firearms in this picture should I be allowed to own?
![]()
Yes, I'll say that ginm control generally doens't put in exceptions for the legislators specifically. Did you find some anomoly? Why don't you link it in your third post on the topic about it.
Your greenshouse gas rant is the typical foaming of the mouth of the right. Between a president with a big motorcade for environemtnal protection, and a president with a big mororcade againt it, you pick the latter.
Nice evasion of my healthcare question.
I'm simply pointing out the hypocrisy of special interest groups in general.
And, yes, I'd prefer a president that isn't a hypocrite.
Nice evasion of my healthcare question.
I'm simply pointing out the hypocrisy of special interest groups in general.
And, yes, I'd prefer a president that isn't a hypocrite.
R.C. Soles. Google the name, he's called a gun control advocate everywhere. I've been through a few pages though, I can't find his voting records to establish just how extreme he is on gun control. One site did say that he opposed the Castle Law that went through in NC, but again, I can't find confirmation.
This is worth quoting to keep around. At the very least, he allegedly was against the Castle Law.
First of all, both shotguns may be Remington 870's, but the scary top one looks like it has an illegally short barrel under 16".
Second, reading the article posting in the opening post of this thread, it mentioned that the intruder had been shot and injured, but not with what type of firearm.
Its one thing to oppose certain gun types and restrict where they can be carried, and quite another to oppose having a weapon for home defense.
More detail is needed of course, but the article stated he shot at the men when they were trying to kick in his front door. This would imply that 1. they weren't in the house yet or 2. if they were in the house he could have had an opportunity to flee.
This sort of case sounds like exactly what the castle law was written for. If he was indeed against it and the facts come out to be similar to the above, that means he thinks that he should be jailed for his actions. Sounds like he was very fortunate that his opposition to castle law failed.
It appears he actually voted to not allow people to shoot intruders in their home without fleeing. He shot an intruder in his home without trying to flee. That seems to be pure hypocrisy.
I tried to find his voting record on this, but I couldn't with a quick search so I am not completely sure if this is all true.
So which of the firearms in this picture should I be allowed to own?
![]()
Ur guns vs my taser, who would win?
