All I've said is that I disagree with everyone discussing this using a Youtube encode.
As I've said, if you guys are all happy to discuss it with the evidence you have, that's fine, but you have to accept criticisms from people like me who think the Youtube encode is complete tosh and you are way underestimating the damage it will randomly cause to video quality.
I apoligies for making a generalisation on the scientific community; that was probably a bad example to use.
Yes: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=.png
I didn't ask for a lossless image format, I asked for lossless images for us to look at. Since there's easily available data that takes no extra effort to get, it would be great if you could provide that for us so we can have a better discussion using this best available data.