"Many people seem to "want" to focus on pitting a single 5870 up against a single 480. But, why would we do this when more likely than not, those who buy the 480 and 5870 are probably going to opt for 2 of them and possibly even 3 or 4!"
You don't want to compare 1:1, yet 3:3 is not valid....
Thanks for the compliment as well
.
As insane as it might be I'll even give you the benefit that you are trying to be unbiased but are just ignorant.
So, lets go through this shall we:
- The situation here is NOT bottlenecked because a MASSIVE over clock (again I point out it was on the most powerful CPU in the world) provided almost no increase. It is VERY difficult to bottleneck something at these resolutions with a CPU. The relationship is not linear but generally speaking if we get x FPS at a lower resolution the CPU is capable of doing that (a bit less) at higher resolutions before it would be the bottleneck. This is absolutely not the case here, high res crushes the FPS in half in many cases. The GPU (even triple crossfire) is the bottleneck.
- The drivers may very well be at fault... but if we are going to discount 3 way for driver issues we may as well go straight back to 1:1 as it is just as likely that driver fixes will improve CF scaling as well... There are two things we can compare.. what we have now and nothing... If we are not allowed to compare what we have now for whatever reason then we are back to nothing.
The review used the 980x for everything.. They used to use a 965 but replaced it for the 980x for this review. It is all written in the configuration page. Despite all of this, the review is no more pointless than the one in the OP... If this one fails based on some merit then all others do as well.