GTX 560 Ti Leaked Benchmarks/Info Thread

[evolucion8]

Extra shaders didn't make much of a difference. Seems like its just 2-3fps more than an equally clocked 460. Looks like a good competitor to the 6870. Not the 6950 though.

Yup, but results in 3DMark benchmarks doesn't show the whole story. The GTX 470 outperforms the HD 5870 slightly and yet, in games, the HD 5870 tended to have the slight edge in performance. So what you said is very accurate, it will rival the HD 6870 and will be slower than the HD 6950.

 

[MustangSVT]

hmm would these drive the 460 prices down ? say... 1gb versions to $100 range with rebates?

 

[MustangSVT]

hmm this is on a chinese site. price is 1799rmb = $270

 

[RussianSensation]

Looks like a good competitor to the 6870. Not the 6950 though.

I think your estimates are too conservative based on some synthetic 3d Mark scores.

HD6950 is 37% faster than a stock GTX460 at 1920x1200 8AA.
GTX470 is 20% faster than a stock GTX460 at 1920x1200 8AA and has only 20% more GPU processing power.

GTX560 with 384 shaders and 820mhz has 39% more GPU processing power than a GTX460. This card will beat an HD6870 and GTX470 without blinking an eye.

If GTX560 is based on GF104, this would explain its "underwhelming" 3dMark11 score. GF104 has far fewer tessellation engines than GF100; 3dmark11 loves tessellation power. But gaming scores will be a different story.

 

[MentalIlness]

hmm this is on a chinese site. price is 1799rmb = $270

Either that is not a GTX 560, or Nvidia is stealing AMD's cooler shrouds. Sticker on the fan says "colorful" I think ?

 

[badb0y]

Either that is not a GTX 560, or Nvidia is stealing AMD's cooler shrouds. Sticker on the fan says "colorful" I think ?

Is that the.......the........BATMOBILE!!

 

[MentalIlness]

Is that the.......the........BATMOBILE!!

:thumbsup::thumbsup:

 

[edplayer]

hmm would these drive the 460 prices down ? say... 1gb versions to $100 range with rebates?

$100 range, No.

 

[MustangSVT]

:thumbsup::thumbsup:

lol, thats exactly what came to my mind.

yeah it does look alot like ATI, but this is in china so it might be fake afterall

 

[Castiel]

I think your estimates are too conservative based on some synthetic 3d Mark scores.

HD6950 is 37% faster than a stock GTX460 at 1920x1200 8AA.
GTX470 is 20% faster than a stock GTX460 at 1920x1200 8AA and has only 20% more GPU processing power.

GTX560 with 384 shaders and 820mhz has 39% more GPU processing power than a GTX460. This card will beat an HD6870 and GTX470 without blinking an eye.

If GTX560 is based on GF104, this would explain its "underwhelming" 3dMark11 score. GF104 has far fewer tessellation engines than GF100; 3dmark11 loves tessellation power. But gaming scores will be a different story.

Nvidia inspector in the first pic states its GF114. I still think this card will do over 1ghz core

 

[Skurge]

I think your estimates are too conservative based on some synthetic 3d Mark scores.

HD6950 is 37% faster than a stock GTX460 at 1920x1200 8AA.
GTX470 is 20% faster than a stock GTX460 at 1920x1200 8AA and has only 20% more GPU processing power.

GTX560 with 384 shaders and 820mhz has 39% more GPU processing power than a GTX460. This card will beat an HD6870 and GTX470 without blinking an eye.

If GTX560 is based on GF104, this would explain its "underwhelming" 3dMark11 score. GF104 has far fewer tessellation engines than GF100; 3dmark11 loves tessellation power. But gaming scores will be a different story.

GPU processing power doesn't scale perfectly. So I would say about 25% maybe 30% faster than a stock 460. Then again, this is just 3dmark so as you it all depends on the games.

 

[evolucion8]

GPU processing power doesn't scale perfectly. So I would say about 25% maybe 30% faster than a stock 460. Then again, this is just 3dmark so as you it all depends on the games.

Specially when 3DMark always favored nVidia cards like the GTX 470 vs HD 5870 in which the former was consistently faster, and yet, the latter showed better performance in games by a small margin.

 

[tviceman]

Extra shaders didn't make much of a difference. Seems like its just 2-3fps more than an equally clocked 460. Looks like a good competitor to the 6870. Not the 6950 though.

At playable frame rates, this card will beat the hd6950 in anand's tests more often than it will lose to the 6870. It will be closer to the 6950 then the 6870.

 

[Skurge]

At playable frame rates, this card will beat the hd6950 in anand's tests more often than it will lose to the 6870. It will be closer to the 6950 then the 6870.

You sound pretty certain about that.

 

[tviceman]

You sound pretty certain about that.

I don't claim to have silverforce like fortune telling (and we all know how that worked out), but I am confident in my prediction.

 

[bryanW1995]

You sound pretty certain about that.

he couched it well by saying "at playable framerates". from looking at clocks/shaders, I'd bet that gtx 560 is going to be slightly faster than a ftw gtx 460. not sure how that holds up to 6950, but I'd think that the 6950 will generally be faster. apparently NV didn't send any ftw's for reviewers to compare when 69x0 launched...

 

[happy medium]

he couched it well by saying "at playable framerates". from looking at clocks/shaders, I'd bet that gtx 560 is going to be slightly faster than a ftw gtx 460. not sure how that holds up to 6950, but I'd think that the 6950 will generally be faster. apparently NV didn't send any ftw's for reviewers to compare when 69x0 launched...

Actually , Notty did the numbers and a gtx460 at about 940 core should equal a stock gtx560 's scores. He had a very similar overall system also.

@ 940 core a gtx460 is competeing with a 5870. A 5870 is about 5% slower then a 6950 but sometimes beating it.

I'm guessing about 5870 performance for the gtx560 for $239.99.

 

[tviceman]

he couched it well by saying "at playable framerates".

I said playable frame rates because I think it's pointless to argue over which card is the fastest at Metro2033 2560x1600 with 4x AA if both cards are averaging under 25fps.

 

[happy medium]

At playable frame rates, this card will beat the hd6950 in anand's tests more often than it will lose to the 6870. It will be closer to the 6950 then the 6870.

The 6870 already has its competition. The gtx460 @ 850 core for $200.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814130596

 

[Skurge]

I don't claim to have silverforce like fortune telling (and we all know how that worked out), but I am confident in my prediction.

Lol, too true.

he couched it well by saying "at playable framerates". from looking at clocks/shaders, I'd bet that gtx 560 is going to be slightly faster than a ftw gtx 460. not sure how that holds up to 6950, but I'd think that the 6950 will generally be faster. apparently NV didn't send any ftw's for reviewers to compare when 69x0 launched...

here is a review that had both. They have horrible graphs though.
http://www.overclockersclub.com/reviews/amd_hd6970_hd6950_review/7.htm

Im not sure but from the overclocked graphs the 6950 is clocked at 906mhz, but the 460ftw is at 921mhz. But the really big difference is the memory clocks. The 6950 is at 1493mhz vs 1022mhz for the 460. As I said memory bandwidth might become a factor with the 560.

http://alienbabeltech.com/main/?p=22610&page=2
ABT also had a 460ftw in their review.

 

[tviceman]

The 6870 already has its competition. The gtx460 @ 850 core for $200.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814130596

Haha holy crap I didn't realize 850mhz gtx460's were officially under $200. Man... in all honesty the gtx570 should be no more than $240 stateside to be considered a "good deal" compared to this. I wonder when they will release the 334 core gf114, and I wonder what clock speed and price they will set it at. 770mhz $190 is my guess.

 

[happy medium]

I wonder when they will release the 334 core gf114, and I wonder what clock speed and price they will set it at. 770mhz $190 is my guess.

My bet, they will set the clocks at the same 820 core as the gtx560 .
That should put performance smack in the middle of the 6850 and 6870.
That would be nice for about $190.

 

[tviceman]

My bet, they will set the clocks at the same 820 core as the gtx560 .
That should put performance smack in the middle of the 6850 and 6870.
That would be nice for about $190.

When chip bins are created, it's usually because of either physical defects or the chip's inability to run at certain speeds within a certain envelope. Just by rule of thumb, Nvidia will most likely have to drop clocks somewhat otherwise the binned parts will run hotter and/or use nearly as much power as the unlocked parts. Hence, the gtx465 and hd5830. Doesn't a 775mhz gtx460 beat an hd6850 anyways?

 

[happy medium]

When chip bins are created, it's usually because of either physical defects or the chip's inability to run at certain speeds within a certain envelope. Just by rule of thumb, Nvidia will most likely have to drop clocks somewhat otherwise the binned parts will run hotter and/or use nearly as much power as the unlocked parts. Hence, the gtx465 and hd5830.

Even @ 775 its still smack in the middle of the 6850 and 6870.,
yes it will still beat a 6850 easily.

 

[Castiel]

Even @ 775 its still smack in the middle of the 6850 and 6870.,
yes it will still beat a 6850 easily.

As much as i want the 560's that 11 score sucks compared to my 6870 score. Might have to wait and see how high they can overclock before deciding to order a pair. Another 6870 might be all i need.