Google has been Compromised

[Chiropteran]

Autocomplete has nothing to do with first result...

 

[MomentsofSanity]

Did you make the image in the OP all on your own?

Post of the thread. Whoosh right over his head.

 

[Balt]

Autocomplete has nothing to do with first result...

Your thread title says 'Google has been Compromised', yet these evil ultra-liberal-billionaire-being-bribed-by-Soros geniuses at Google didn't even bother to change the ranking of search results.

Maybe you're just wrong.

 

[Commodus]

Better a joker than a sheep.

It's hilarious that you accuse most of us of being "sheep" when you rubber stamp virtually everything Trump does without question.

We know Clinton had serious issues. Not as bad as the Trump/Breitbart/InfoWars camp made them out to be at times, but bad all the same. The difference is that many of us could weigh those flaws against Trump's and decide that Clinton was still a much better candidate. Yeah, the private email server was stupid, and the Clinton Foundation was dodgy... but you know what's worse? An egotistical businessman with no political experience who disrespects women, minorities, immigrants, climate science and the free press, all the while engaging in cronyism and corruption that makes Clinton look like a straight shooter.

 

[sdifox]

It's hilarious that you accuse most of us of being "sheep" when you rubber stamp virtually everything Trump does without question.

We know Clinton had serious issues. Not as bad as the Trump/Breitbart/InfoWars camp made them out to be at times, but bad all the same. The difference is that many of us could weigh those flaws against Trump's and decide that Clinton was still a much better candidate. Yeah, the private email server was stupid, and the Clinton Foundation was dodgy... but you know what's worse? An egotistical businessman with no political experience who disrespects women, minorities, immigrants, climate science and the free press, all the while engaging in cronyism and corruption that makes Clinton look like a straight shooter.

I would never insult the sheep by calling the op a sheep. He is a parrot.

 

[Chiropteran]

businessman with no political experience who disrespects women, minorities, immigrants, climate science and the free press,

Boohoo, he doesn't show respect to those who don't deserve it. How the hell is that remotely comparable to criminal actions and blatant corruption of Clinton?

I get it. You want a president who is nice. You want a president who is polite. You want a president that is politically correct.

I want a president who can actually bring about positive change.

Luckily, you lost.

 

[Jhhnn]

Boohoo, he doesn't show respect to those who don't deserve it. How the hell is that remotely comparable to criminal actions and blatant corruption of Clinton?

I get it. You want a president who is nice. You want a president who is polite. You want a president that is politically correct.

I want a president who can actually bring about positive change.

Luckily, you lost.

Grabbing them by the pussy, right?

 

[Chiropteran]

It's funny, if you look at the success of 50 Shades Darker, it appears that many woman enjoy the idea of being "grabbed in the pussy" by rich men.

 

[ch33zw1z]

Right back to entertainment, where Trump belongs

 

[Commodus]

Boohoo, he doesn't show respect to those who don't deserve it. How the hell is that remotely comparable to criminal actions and blatant corruption of Clinton?

I get it. You want a president who is nice. You want a president who is polite. You want a president that is politically correct.

I want a president who can actually bring about positive change.

Luckily, you lost.

So you're saying women, minorities, the free press and science don't deserve respect?

It's not about political correctness. It's about having a President that represents all Americans, not just white straight Christian men, and actually respects the freedoms the country represents.

Also, you're one to talk about "blatant corruption" when Trump is appointing people who have obvious financial interests in manipulating the departments they're running. When he's trying to censor climate change research because his buddies in the fossil fuel industry don't want to lose business to renewable energy rivals. When he's trying to enrich himself using his position (such as through having political figures stay at his places) and has a "blind trust" run by family members who clearly make this anything but blind.

How do you get positive change through bans that target specific religions, through mass deportations, through a burning desire to roll women's reproductive freedoms back to 1950? Through hurting the long-term climate in the name of short-term greed? Through treating the free press as the "enemy" because it doesn't repeat easily disproven lies as though they were fact? Trump's policy largely revolves around negative change. It's about trying to turn back the clock, to restrict rights and freedoms and hand the country over to corporate interests.

 

[MrSquished]

 

[sandorski]

Cool story Bro.

 

[Younigue]

Boohoo, he doesn't show respect to those who don't deserve it. How the hell is that remotely comparable to criminal actions and blatant corruption of Clinton?

I get it. You want a president who is nice. You want a president who is polite. You want a president that is politically correct.

I want a president who can actually bring about positive change.

Luckily, you lost.

No, just a President that speaks intelligently because he's intelligent. A President that loves his Country and its people. A President that isn't a chronic open wound, paranoid, delusional, supremely insecure, a child,, mentally ill, pathological in his (or her) lying. A President who is interested in the betterment of the country and its people rather than the betterment of his ego and wallet...
I could go on forever and none of it would have to do with how truly, deeply vulgar and politically incorrect he is.

He is too volatile to do the job.

Transparency in this case isn't refreshing, it's a man with no filter (dangerous), no discernible moral compass, no empathy and no desire to acquire such traits because he's rich, he's Donald Trump and he can get away with it. He didn't say that because he relates to the people. He said it with disdain for the people.

Also the "change" he is signing off on is negative, hateful, discriminatory, controlling, weakening, embarrassing, restrictive... again I could go on and on more than I already have (I know, surprising).

Add (in a shallow sense) on top of that, he's just plain gross and ugly and my eyes and ears would like to no longer suffer this fool.

 

[agent00f]

Google auto-completes are a byproduct of ML algorithms based on search inputs, those of the user in particular.

Of course it's totally expected of conservatives to be too tarded to grasp how computers work.

 

[Brainonska511]

But it's the same photograph...

Trumps talk retroactively changed later in the day?

The same photograph! Oh no! Newspapers don't disintegrate 2-3 hours after printing. You're a joke. It's an editorial decision that led to a changing of headline for the later edition.

 

[Bowfinger]

Boohoo, he doesn't show respect to those who don't deserve it. How the hell is that remotely comparable to criminal actions and blatant corruption of Clinton?

Umm, sweetie? Your double standard is showing. In another thread you suggested that accusations must be verified by the courts before they're valid. By your (absurd) standard, you don't get to attack Hillary. Just sayin'.

(Naturally, you're also ignoring the long, long list of examples of Trump's corruption, many of which have been verified by courts. Sad.)

I get it. You want a president who is nice. You want a president who is polite. You want a president that is politically correct.

No, we want a president who is a mature, rational adult instead of a thin-skinned, reckless toddler. We want a president who wants what's best for America instead of what's best for his ego and his family's bank accounts.

I want a president who can actually bring about positive change.

And he may ... if you're a billionaire. Working Americans, however, are screwed.

Luckily, you lost.

Unfortunately, "you" means 99.9% of Americans. Americans lost, even though 40% of them haven't caught on yet. In the con business, you're called "marks".

 

[Jhhnn]

It's funny, if you look at the success of 50 Shades Darker, it appears that many woman enjoy the idea of being "grabbed in the pussy" by rich men.

It merely appears that a lot of people enjoy a twisted story.

 

[FelixDeCat]

Man, you are really angry at me aren't you?

People get mad when you tell them Soros is a manipulator.

 

[Chiropteran]

The same photograph! Oh no! Newspapers don't disintegrate 2-3 hours after printing. You're a joke. It's an editorial decision that led to a changing of headline for the later edition.

An editorial decision to LIE.

 

[Chiropteran]

So you're saying women, minorities, the free press and science don't deserve respect?

Correct.

Absolutely nobody deserves respect by default. It must be earned.

 

[Commodus]

Correct.

Absolutely nobody deserves respect by default. It must be earned.

Unless someone is a threat or has committed a serious crime, everyone always deserves a basic amount of respect. It's called being a decent human being. You respect their self-determination and their rights to live in peace and without discrimination.

 

[Chiropteran]

Unless someone is a threat or has committed a serious crime, everyone always deserves a basic amount of respect. It's called being a decent human being. You respect their self-determination and their rights to live in peace and without discrimination.

I face a lot of disrespect and discrimination for being a Trump supporter. Why aren't you defending me?

 

[Commodus]

I face a lot of disrespect and discrimination for being a Trump supporter. Why aren't you defending me?

If someone launches childish attacks at you, sure. But when someone challenges your logic and rationale? Sorry, you're on your own.

 

[Chiropteran]

If someone launches childish attacks at you, sure. But when someone challenges your logic and rationale? Sorry, you're on your own.

What if I told you Trumps "disrespectful" statements were based on rational logic?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/12/central-america-migrants-rape_n_5806972.html

Interesting, the "Mexican rapists" thing wasn't blatant disrespect, maybe it was based on logic. (The irony that huffpost wrote this piece and now is a vicious enemy of Trump hasn't escaped me).

 

[Commodus]

What if I told you Trumps "disrespectful" statements were based on rational logic?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/12/central-america-migrants-rape_n_5806972.html

Interesting, the "Mexican rapists" thing wasn't blatant disrespect, maybe it was based on logic. (The irony that huffpost wrote this piece and now is a vicious enemy of Trump hasn't escaped me).

I would say you're wrong, because you're conflating two separate claims that don't really mesh.

Trump's assertion was that the illegal immigrants crossing the border tended to be rapists and other serious criminals. This is a stat indicating that most of the women traveling from Central America to the US are raped while in Mexico (or potentially earlier). It's still absolutely horrible, but it indicates that there's issues with corruption and a lack of sexual violence prevention in Mexico, not that people emigrating from Mexico are rapists. If anything, it suggests that many of those crossing the border are victims, not perpetrators.

Also, illegal immigrants have a historically lower crime rate than legal residents, in part because they fear being deported if they're caught. These are the people trying to pursue a better life, not to go on sexual assault sprees.