• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

God: A Mass Murderer?

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
gimmewhitecastles said:
Well he did promise clean up everything and eliminate sickness and death in the future. He could have cleaned up everything but in order to do so, to prevent challenges like this in the future, he would have to eliminate "free will". But receiving worship from "robots" does not serve any point or purpose.
Click to expand...

I don't understand how eliminating sickness eliminates free will, and I don't even understand what that concept has to do with God tolerating the torment of an innocent man.
 
gimmewhitecastles said:
God didn't partake in those things, he let it happen.
Click to expand...
Isn't that a bit like taping a lit firecracker to a baby's hand, and then trying to say you didn't "partake" in blowing the baby's fingers off? You just "let it happen," after all.

The mental contortions of which theists are capable never cease to astound me.

Well once the point is proven, there will be no more challenges or rebellions because there is precedent. He took the future into consideration.
Click to expand...
It's also pretty silly to say that God knows the future infallibly yet does not "partake" in the future he created with that infallible foreknowledge. We penalize people in civil court for things that they could reasonably foresee as consequences of their choices, yet nobody indicts God for infallibly foreseeing the consequences of his choice to create exactly this universe.
 
Awesome, I didn't know people on here watched his videos. They were pretty much the last straw for me in terms of becoming an atheist. I was already having doubts, but his arguments really blew it away. He's pretty talented.
 
Jeff7 said:
So God is incapable of issuing challenges on his own? He's incapable of properly engineering a being, and then debugging his own design? He needs someone else to torment and torture his beloved creations to tease out flaws?

While I'm ok with some animal testing, done for things like live-saving medicines, well, we humans don't have "all-knowing" on our resumes. The Christian god does. I'd expect even just a reasonably-advanced alien race to be capable of creating a simulation which would show how a human brain would react to any given situation. Certainly an all-knowing, all-powerful entity would be able to just give the scenario an idle thought, and arrive at a conclusion, all without the torture and such inflicted by one of his out-of-control creations.
Click to expand...

Even amonst us, simulations are not accepted as hard evidence. Because the real world has many different x factors.

Ok, then how would you have created the angels and humans then? What would you have done differently? If you make every creation only capable of good then you've already eliminated "free will" which doesn't give any purpose to the act of creation itself. In a real life scenario, if you had kids, would you rather your kids love you and respect you by coming to the decision on their own or would you reengineer them, put inhibitors in their brain so that they never fall out of line?
 
gimmewhitecastles said:
Even amonst us, simulations are not accepted as hard evidence. Because the real world has many different x factors.

Ok, then how would you have created the angels and humans then? What would you have done differently? If you make every creation only capable of good then you've already eliminated "free will" which doesn't give any purpose to the act of creation itself.
Click to expand...


Because I don't have wings and I can't fly I don't have free will?

Because I can't swim like a fish I don't have free will?

Things you can't do in life.

In a real life scenario, if you had kids, would you rather your kids love you and respect you by coming to the decision on their own or would you reengineer them, put inhibitors in their brain so that they never fall out of line?
Click to expand...


Uh, are you dumb?

We are engineered to love our parents. No free will.
We respect them 'cause they're bigger than us. No free will.
We are also engineered to want to socialize. No free will.
We are also engineered to not want to hurt babies. No free will.

Fuck, I guess we don't really have free will after all.
 
totalnoob said:
It doesn't matter what local traditions were at the time..The bible is supposed to contain the supreme moral law by a flawless being. Forcing rape victims to marry their rapists would be considered quite sick by modern standards. The fact that genocide, rape, slavery, etc were common thousands of years ago is no excuse for a timeless god. He would have known these things were wrong and issued commandments against them, rather than prescribing twisted rules for how they were to be carried out. Mere mortals should never be able to surpass the morality of a timeless god, but apparently we have.
Click to expand...

He did issue commandments against them but not all were punishable by death. Like today's modern laws. Those directions were only stipulations in case the law wasn't followed. And if you consider the traditions of those times, that was a pretty good arrangement. Just because we think it is sick today doesn't mean our standards applied to back in the day. And according to the New Testament, Christians don't even follow the Mosaic Law anymore. (e.g. Circumcision is not required)
 
totalnoob said:
Preventing earthquakes, tsunamis, parasites, disease, cancer, birth defects, etc eliminates our free will HOW exactly?
Click to expand...

For that you'll have to go back to the challenge presented in the Garden of Eden. By eating the forbidden fruit, humankind decided they can rule themselves without God. Because they chose to leave then they need to deal with their problems on their own. That means no intervention from God. Preventing earthquakes does not have anything to with eliminating free will. I don't get your point.
 
Rationalization.

Our actions become increasingly depended on cold calculations and efficiency, than our values and traditions. Some say we're sacrificing the fabric that keeps society civil for faster output and productivity. God was never the true murderer, but he was a good excuse.
 
Regs said:
Rationalization.

Our actions become increasingly depended on cold calculations and efficiency, than our values and traditions. Some say we're sacrificing the fabric that keeps society civil for faster output and productivity. God was never the true murderer, but he was a good excuse.
Click to expand...

Arguably we've been doing that since the Dark Ages ended.
 
Blackjack200 said:
Awesome, I didn't know people on here watched his videos. They were pretty much the last straw for me in terms of becoming an atheist. I was already having doubts, but his arguments really blew it away. He's pretty talented.
Click to expand...

a good playlist I recommend..

http://www.youtube.com/user/AronRa#grid/user/126AFB53A6F002CC (watch his "second foundational falsehood of creationism" video. It only takes him 2 minutes 8 seconds to COMPLETELY DESTROY every religion)🙂

more good atheist channels..

http://www.youtube.com/user/QualiaSoup#p/u/3/T69TOuqaqXI
http://www.youtube.com/user/NonStampCollector
http://www.youtube.com/user/AtheistExperience
http://www.youtube.com/user/cdk007
http://www.youtube.com/user/BionicDance
http://www.youtube.com/user/EdwardCurrent
http://www.youtube.com/user/FFreeThinker
http://www.youtube.com/user/ZOMGitsCriss
 
gimmewhitecastles said:
For that you'll have to go back to the challenge presented in the Garden of Eden. By eating the forbidden fruit, humankind decided they can rule themselves without God. Because they chose to leave then they need to deal with their problems on their own. That means no intervention from God. Preventing earthquakes does not have anything to with eliminating free will. I don't get your point.
Click to expand...

He's intervened lots of times according to some sources. Lots of smitings, lots of wars with god on one side.
 
gimmewhitecastles said:
And according to the New Testament, Christians don't even follow the Mosaic Law anymore. (e.g. Circumcision is not required)
Click to expand...

Did Jesus not say "every jot and tiddle" of the old law was to be obeyed? In any case, the mosaic laws do not speak well of your "perfect" god. He gave explicit directions on how men could sell their daughters into slavery, how much people could charge for slaves, how hard they were allowed to beat their slaves, how they were to mark them as property (by driving a stake through their ear), etc. Even the "kindler gentler" new testament never condemns slavery. On the contrary..

Slaves, obey your earthly masters with deep respect and fear. Serve them sincerely as you would serve Christ. - Ephesians 6:5

Christians who are slaves should give their masters full respect so that the name of God and his teaching will not be shamed. If your master is a Christian, that is no excuse for being disrespectful. You should work all the harder because you are helping another believer by your efforts. - 1 Timothy 6:1-2

That servant who knows his master's will and does not get ready or does not do what his master wants will be beaten with many blows. But the one who does not know and does things deserving punishment will be beaten with few blows. - Luke 12:47
Click to expand...

For that you'll have to go back to the challenge presented in the Garden of Eden. By eating the forbidden fruit, humankind decided they can rule themselves without God.
Click to expand...

Fail. This was the tree of KNOWLEDGE. Before they ate the fruit, they had no knowledge of right and wrong, good or evil. Without knowledge of the concept of evil, they had no means of knowing their actions were evil..yet they were punished anyway. Think about this buddy..God is timeless and omniscient, which means he knows everything that will ever happen. He created a man with an inquisitive nature (knowing how he would respond to the magic tree). He then proceeded to create the tree, create the evil talking snake, allow the snake into the garden, then allow the "crime" to take place. Unless God is flawed and possesses imperfect knowledge, he knew the millisecond he finished creating Adam that this would happen..yet he chose to do it anyway, rather than erasing him and starting over. It's just like dropping your cat/dog, then punishing it for hitting the ground.

If you want to cling the assumption that God is omniscient, the only conclusion you can draw from the Adam story is that "the fall" (and subsequent punishment of BILLIONS of Adam's descendants) was part of the plan from the beginning.
 
Last edited:
Cerpin Taxt said:
Isn't that a bit like taping a lit firecracker to a baby's hand, and then trying to say you didn't "partake" in blowing the baby's fingers off? You just "let it happen," after all.

The mental contortions of which theists are capable never cease to astound me.
Click to expand...

Isn't taping a lit firecracker considered "partaking"?

It's also pretty silly to say that God knows the future infallibly yet does not "partake" in the future he created with that infallible foreknowledge. We penalize people in civil court for things that they could reasonably foresee as consequences of their choices, yet nobody indicts God for infallibly foreseeing the consequences of his choice to create exactly this universe.
Click to expand...

Things that are significant to a child become less and less significant as they grow older. A child may cry that his favorite toy broke. Also a year to a child is feels like an eternity. As adults we don't care that our favorite toy broke back then and a year passes by pretty fast to us. The point is the way we perceive our world is relative to our age.

If we gain eternal life as was originally intended, the stuff we went through in our first 80 years or so will seem brief and insignificant. God also knows this and is planning accordingly.
 
Christians try and discount the Old testament. Apparently, only the new testament is valid in using as an argument against them.

This is how they honestly think
 
Regs said:
Rationalization.

Our actions become increasingly depended on cold calculations and efficiency, than our values and traditions. Some say we're sacrificing the fabric that keeps society civil for faster output and productivity. God was never the true murderer, but he was a good excuse.
Click to expand...

Bingo. God was invented to rationalize what people wanted to do and were going to do anyway. Killing, raping, stealing, plundering, tormenting anyone who is not exactly like you, those are pretty horrible acts and they tend to weigh on the conscience after a while. But fabricate a big book of fairy tales where somebody more powerful than you demands such acts removes your personal sense of responsibility for your own deeds. Stanley Milgram did some great research on the acts man was willing to commit as long as it was validated by somebody higher up. He meant it as a study in war crimes to see what soldiers were capable of when following order, but it holds true for religion too. People desperately want somebody else to blame for their own animal instincts and an invisible man in the sky is a perfect solution.
 
AMDZen said:
Christians try and discount the Old testament. Apparently, only the new testament is valid in using as an argument against them.

This is how they honestly think
Click to expand...

The Christians that do are in the wrong.
2 Timothy 3:16: "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness."

The Mosaic Law was a covenant meant for the Hebrews. But that doesn't mean we can't learn from it. From studying the events of the Old Testament we are able to see how the laws were designed to protect the people. Once we understand the spirit of the Law, we can then apply it to our lives naturally.
 
gimmewhitecastles said:
The Christians that do are in the wrong.
2 Timothy 3:16: "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness."

The Mosaic Law was a covenant meant for the Hebrews. But that doesn't mean we can't learn from it. From studying the events of the Old Testament we are able to see how the laws were designed to protect the people. Once we understand the spirit of the Law, we can then apply it to our lives naturally.
Click to expand...

Awesome. Since the spirit of the laws are clearly punitive, sadistics, and moral less - I guess it makes perfect sense.
 
totalnoob said:
a good playlist I recommend..

http://www.youtube.com/user/AronRa#grid/user/126AFB53A6F002CC (watch his "second foundational falsehood of creationism" video. It only takes him 2 minutes 8 seconds to COMPLETELY DESTROY every religion)🙂

more good atheist channels..

http://www.youtube.com/user/QualiaSoup#p/u/3/T69TOuqaqXI
http://www.youtube.com/user/NonStampCollector
http://www.youtube.com/user/AtheistExperience
http://www.youtube.com/user/cdk007
http://www.youtube.com/user/BionicDance
http://www.youtube.com/user/EdwardCurrent
http://www.youtube.com/user/FFreeThinker
http://www.youtube.com/user/ZOMGitsCriss
Click to expand...

Can't watch from work but I recognize 4 of them. QualiaSoup and cdk especially make outstanding videos. Edward Current is decent, ZOMGitsCriss... 😀

If I can recommend a couple of my own (don't have the link but they're very easy to search):

Pat Condell - former stand up comic that puts out a talking-head video ever 3 or 4 days, his sarcastic rants against Catholicism and Islam are absolutely fantastic.

DPRJones - Used to be really good but IMO has fallen off a bit recently. Watch some of his early stuff.
 
gimmewhitecastles said:
Isn't taping a lit firecracker considered "partaking"?
Click to expand...
<sigh> :\

OF COURSE IT IS. That's the point I was making, moron. Isn't creating a universe that you know will result in the deliberate and unwarranted tormenting of one of your creations ALSO "partaking" in it?


Things that are significant to a child become less and less significant as they grow older. A child may cry that his favorite toy broke. Also a year to a child is feels like an eternity. As adults we don't care that our favorite toy broke back then and a year passes by pretty fast to us. The point is the way we perceive our world is relative to our age.
Click to expand...
Ok... seriously... what the FUCK are you babbling about?

If we gain eternal life as was originally intended, the stuff we went through in our first 80 years or so will seem brief and insignificant. God also knows this and is planning accordingly.
Click to expand...
This has absolutely nothing to do with the point I made.

Let me restate it: If God foreknows infallibly that his decision to create this exact universe would inescapably result in Job's unwarranted torment, how is it that you can claim god is not responsible? That he did not
"partake," as you put it?

NOTHING you posted came anywhere in the neighborhood of even acknowledging that you understood the question, let alone addressing the challenge posed by it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top