Elfear
Diamond Member
- May 30, 2004
- 7,165
- 824
- 126
The 7970 ghz is just an OC'd version of a 7970. Do you think that speaks highly of AMD's business integrity to release a graphics card and re-release it after a competitors version that is better?
Do you realize NVIDIA can do the same thing? Where do you draw the line and look at it from a realistic perspective of NVIDIA releasing quality products from the start and sticking with their products?
Sorry but I am failing to see the issue here. If after releasing new cards we can now get better performance for less money, why as a consumer would you complain? Even if you only go with Nvidia cards, more fierce competition has caused 670 prices to drop so again you win. I have no idea why you're relating AMD's reaction to Kepler with poor quality or lack of integrity.
Honestly it sounds like you bought a 670/680 when first released and now you're angry that the AMD cards are more competitive now.
As a consumer, how can you only look at remade products and overclocked products to decide between two graphics cards. This is quite frankly stupid and shows exactly why AMD has the 'stereotype', if you will, of being CHEAP.
"Remade" products? So should we ignore all the refreshes that come down the pipeline? Was the GTX 580 "cheap" and unworthy of consideration because it was a remade product?
Let me give you the perspective that most consumers have when shopping for a video card. 1) Look at reviews and see how the competition stacks up, 2) look at vendors and see how much the competing cards are going for, and 3) choose the card that gives you the most bang-for-your-buck with an acceptable level of performance. A factory-overclocked card is generally considered a good thing.
If factory-overclocked cards are available for close to the same price as reference, why would you be angry about that? Generally factory oced cards have HIGHER quality components, not lower as you imply.
Absolutely! If I was in the market for a new card at the time and Nvidia offered a cheaper card that performed better than AMD's offering there's no question it would influence me. Releasing a faster card for the same or less money is a win no matter how you look at it.If NVIDIA released the 670/680 'B' to pull ahead in benchmarks (just a mild overclock), would that influence you to go back to NVIDIA?
Uh happy people? A mid-cycle refresh that adds more performance seems like a smart move to me. Why let the competition beat you for a whole year when you can quickly release an upgraded model for the same money?Lets look at it from another perspective, if BMW released a direct competitor to an AUDI A5 and it had a lot more horsepower and AUDI countered this by releasing the A5 B which only had higher horsepower at the cost of higher mpg, what do you think would be the result? People would be outraged and AUDI could just say, well, you can just have a tune up or slight modification and the car will be the same as the B! This is exactly what AMD is doing and is simply stupid.
What do you think most refreshes are?Lastly, why don't the companies just keep releasing overclocked cards one after another ?
Last edited: