Getting Divorced - It is officially over! Done! Fini!

Page 12 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

SaigonK

Diamond Member
Aug 13, 2001
7,482
3
0
www.robertrivas.com
[/quote] Again she legally DOES NOT have to listen to you...ya see now? Also assuming the only way you heard her 'comments' to her lawyer was that you were present...your 'tense and description' of the situation is abnormal. Å[/quote]


She does not have to listen to me, i dont dispute that. But she does have to listen to the law, i honestly think she has the idea that because she thinks she is right that she will get everything her way,
I am not an angel, but neither is she. But she cant apply the rules ot me and not to herself, its wrong and its not her choice. Divorce isnt run by one and not the other.

this all should have been easier than it has been, it should have been a simple slit down the middle, she can have 1/2 my stock, money and 401k. I want to see my children. I dont want to pay her $70k of debt that she ran up, why should i?
 

SaigonK

Diamond Member
Aug 13, 2001
7,482
3
0
www.robertrivas.com
Thanks for the discussion Alkemyst, it was interesting to hear another point of view on this whole thing.
I am not above saying I can be wrong, its human nature to feel one is right and one is wrong. I have been wrong inour marriage, and i will probably be wrong in our divorce in some way...but so is she.

She (nor anyone) shouldnt expect the fringe benefits of marriage without being willing to make the commitment to it.
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
Originally posted by: SaigonK

And i dont see my going to an amusement park as a "crazy thing" during my divorce.

It is quite a crazy thing yes. It's not normal especially when you think about the possibilities of flight risks parents divorcing can be and hense why many states prohibit leaving them until a divorce is resolved.

However, another thing too is you are asking for donations a lot and even posting paypal links (I think you claimed tax deductible too)....are you out to profit from this or have it covered cost free? Seriously someone begging for money shouldn't be carting the family to interstate amusement parks.

We have bashed heads on 'ethics' issues in the past so chances are you won't see the wrong in it here.

Å
 

Armitage

Banned
Feb 23, 2001
8,086
0
0
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: SaigonK


Actually in this state she cant deny me the right to take them out of state, or anywhere for that matter. I have full parental rights until we are divorced and while we live togethor.
I am not saying she should "bend over" and give me my way, but this isnt about me, its a trip for my kids with their cousins and friends to an amusement park, its pretty sad.

I can honestly say, she has friends in Hawaii, that if she wanted to go there and visit them for a week on vacation with the girls, i would let her because i know she isnt going to do anything to jeopardize her standing with the court or me. Why cant she see it the same way? I am not sure to be honest.

Either way my lawye is going to get involved and we are going to be hashing it out!

WTF...the same way you want to take them out of state, she has a right to keep them in-state...are you just playing against the laws to prove a point?

Uhm ... reading comprehension problems again stud?
According to SaigonK, there is no restraining order in place, so when he has the kids she has no legal right to prevent him from taking the kids out of state.

She has the same rights you do and will more than likely continue to have even after you part ways. You are throwing out I would, I could, I will's to justify a stand....that's typical debate fodder...esp when you have said she's a little broke now.

Yup, she has exactly the same right to take them out of the state, and he has exactly the same lack of a right to prevent her. Unless somebody escalates the situation and asks for a restraining order.

Good luck with it I hope the kids come out ok.

Å

 

Armitage

Banned
Feb 23, 2001
8,086
0
0
Originally posted by: SaigonK
Q] WTF...the same way you want to take them out of state, she has a right to keep them in-state...are you just playing against the laws to prove a point? She has the same rights you do and will more than likely continue to have even after you part ways. You are throwing out I would, I could, I will's to justify a stand....that's typical debate fodder...esp when you have said she's a little broke now. Good luck with it I hope the kids come out ok. Å


And my point was more that legally I DO NOT have to listen to her, I CAN take them. I told her about the trip, i told her the plans, I told her that it was for the kids, we did this all the time in the past why should it change now? Her comment to her lawyer about the whole thing? How much is it costing him? Is he using vacation time to cover it? How much are tickets?

Really....is that ridiculous to anyone but me?[/quote]

In most states you are barred from making "extraordinary expenditures", diluting assets, etc. while in a divorce. That may be her grounds for asking. But I hardly see a trip to an amusement park fitting into that catagory. Whether you're using vacation time to do it??? I have no idea how that is her business.
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
Originally posted by: ergeorge

Uhm ... reading comprehension problems again stud?
According to SaigonK, there is no restraining order in place, so when he has the kids she has no legal right to prevent him from taking the kids out of state.

ummmm no 'dude'. According to the 'law' he has a legal right to take them out of the state, and as you somehow remembered below (but just wanted to take a jab at me apparently, go you!) she has a legal right to keep them in state. These 'legal' issues are the laws he is playing semantics with. Chances are if she is that broke it 1) slaps her in the face since he can provide better 2) possibly aligns the kids to a parent that can 'treat' them with financial gifts 3) can put a fear of flight risk into her 4) sets her up as a possible enemy to the children when she says 'no'. You really have to understand what happens in divorces especially with children to understand what is *really* going on...of course it could be just harmless too, but that is doubtful.

Most times the more vocal is the more guilty...the same way a polite person keeps damaging information about another private....again though it could be a momentary slip out of spite/anger...but this is constant.

On top of all this, he is begging for money for his 'defense'. I think it's in poor taste to be doing amusement park trips during a time like that. If the child was dying that would be a different matter.

For the record, almost everyone's 'exes' are certifiablly insane, sluts, gold diggers, drug addicts, child abusers, etc....the funny parts is many times even when kids are not involved the courts don't see it that way. I will say it is a given that the court's do try to place the kids still with their mothers even if there is a slight skew towards the father.

Yup, she has exactly the same right to take them out of the state, and he has exactly the same lack of a right to prevent her. Unless somebody escalates the situation and asks for a restraining order.

Anyways you apparently remembered the 'legal issues' / laws here so I think we are on the same page.

Å

 

Armitage

Banned
Feb 23, 2001
8,086
0
0
Originally posted by: alkemyst
Originally posted by: ergeorge

Uhm ... reading comprehension problems again stud?
According to SaigonK, there is no restraining order in place, so when he has the kids she has no legal right to prevent him from taking the kids out of state.

ummmm no 'dude'. According to the 'law' he has a legal right to take them out of the state, and as you somehow remembered below (but just wanted to take a jab at me apparently, go you!) she has a legal right to keep them in state.

Like I said, work on that reading comprehension. I said the exact same thing above as I did below.
She does not have a legal right to prevent him from taking the kids out of the state when it is his time with the kids.

These 'legal' issues are the laws he is playing semantics with. Chances are if she is that broke it 1) slaps her in the face since he can provide better 2) possibly aligns the kids to a parent that can 'treat' them with financial gifts 3) can put a fear of flight risk into her 4) sets her up as a possible enemy to the children when she says 'no'.

1. Not his problem. According to Saigon, this is a normal summer trip for them. Why should his kids childhood be disrupted by not allowing them their normal summer vacation.
2. If it's not out of the ordinary, I see no problem with that. I think kids see beyond that pretty well anyway. Time is more important then money.
3. I agree with this one, having recently been in a similar situation involving international travel ... I think the timing could be better, and I said so earlier in the thread.
4. She can't say no, unless she files for a restraining order.

You really have to understand what happens in divorces especially with children to understand what is *really* going on...of course it could be just harmless too, but that is doubtful.

Yea, actually I have a pretty good understanding of this.

Most times the more vocal is the more guilty...the same way a polite person keeps damaging information about another private....again though it could be a momentary slip out of spite/anger...but this is constant.

This is complete bullsh|t. In my experience, the more guilty party tends to keep a low profile and keep their mouth shut. The maligned party tends to speak up more about their injustice. At least in the cases I've seen.

On top of all this, he is begging for money for his 'defense'. I think it's in poor taste to be doing amusement park trips during a time like that. If the child was dying that would be a different matter.

I must have missed that one.

For the record, almost everyone's 'exes' are certifiablly insane, sluts, gold diggers, drug addicts, child abusers, etc....the funny parts is many times even when kids are not involved the courts don't see it that way. I will say it is a given that the court's do try to place the kids still with their mothers even if there is a slight skew towards the father.

Yup, she has exactly the same right to take them out of the state, and he has exactly the same lack of a right to prevent her. Unless somebody escalates the situation and asks for a restraining order.

Anyways you apparently remembered the 'legal issues' / laws here so I think we are on the same page.

I didn't say anything different here then I did above.

 

Pliablemoose

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
25,195
0
56
This thread should be required reading for those dating & considering marriage.

A couple of points spring to mind:

1.) If you plan to marry & make babies with someone that has ties to another country, you need a pre-nup with penalties that adresses banning international travel in the event of a divorce or even without a divorce. Even in countries that are a party to the Hague Convention, it takes months & tons of money to get your children back, if you ever get them back. If they go into hiding in another country you have virtually ZERO chance of ever seeing your children again. We're talikng about tens of thousands of dollars here.

2.) By the time most couples consider counselling, it's really time to hire a lawyer & get a divorce.

3.) In a divorce with children involved, the BS continues @ least till they're 18 & adults.

4.) Every action you take needs to be viewed through the following filter: Can I look my son or daughter in the eye when they're an adult & say that I was fair & reasonable during the divorce & afterwards.

5.) Thank god I didn't get a divorce in the state SaigonK lives in....

6.) I really hate how folks that have been through a divorce without children involved like to wade into something they know virtually nothing about (children/custody/child support) & the state laws concerning divorce in a particular state. Divorce laws aren't federal laws, they're state by state & vary widely on virtually every point.

7.) Got a bitch about current divorce laws? Politicians will come right out & tell you it's the third rail of politics, tinker with it & you prob won't ever be re-elected.

8.) Also if you ever want a concealed carry permit, @ least in TX, you can't ever have had a restraining order filed against you, so a pre-nup that covers the non-issuing of restraining orders (automatic in some states) needs to be drafted/signed.

As far as the amusument park trip, I don't see any problem with it, evidently no restraining order, no flight risk...

The Easter family thing, I agree with you, unless your parents invited her specifically.

I'd like to see @ least a partial child tax credit given to the non-custodial spouse for all the child support they cough up (that kind of change would affect me, a custodial parent, but it really seems only fair.

I appreciate this thread a lot, I've started many a thread about my ex & you get a few lumps from unsympathetic folks & people that are determined to play the devil's advocate for you, but it's giving SaigonK a sounding board & a chance to vent.

One of the coolest PM's I ever got was from a divorced dad who was awarded custody of his children under the age of 10, he'd seen the flames I took in my threads & was afraid to post anything about the custody issue because of the criticism it would generate. He thanked me for my threads & being the inspiration to fight for custody.
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
Originally posted by: ergeorge

Like I said, work on that reading comprehension. I said the exact same thing above as I did below.
She does not have a legal right to prevent him from taking the kids out of the state when it is his time with the kids.

She is legally their mother, they are still her kids, they are not divorced yet and as it stands there is still joint custody. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand this if you would just think instead of attempting to argue.

It is as much her right to keep them here as it is his right to take them away...all legally. If custody for the summer had been already awarded and trips were also allowed then he would have 100% ability to take the trip no matter how much she cried about it.

1. Not his problem. According to Saigon, this is a normal summer trip for them. Why should his kids childhood be disrupted by not allowing them their normal summer vacation.

I supposed if there mother was dying let the show carry on as well too? right? Anyways the court will more than likely rule on it, if they saw a history of this trip each year they may still vote against it due to the divorce. These are all things we don't have access to here, yet all these battered exes want to jump on the defense bandwagon.

4. She can't say no, unless she files for a restraining order.

Yes she can, if he doesn't see accordingly then she can take him to court. Whether a restraining order or not gets issued is up to the courts.

This is complete bullsh|t. In my experience, the more guilty party tends to keep a low profile and keep their mouth shut. The maligned party tends to speak up more about their injustice. At least in the cases I've seen.

I will assume you have a small group of friends then and do not go out socially much. Divorce talk is quite popular if you have lots of friends. The funny thing is on many where I was friends with both parties the one you knew was always the problem is the one going around talking crap. Claiming they were the pillar that held it all together.

Also in many divorces no matter how terrible the picture is painted the facts are the main reason is just a change of heart and now the person feels they must make the other terrible to get out innocently. It sort of makes a good person feel bad that even though they have 4 kids with some chick and have 10 years of marriage behind them, they still dread the sound of her voice, the way she sleeps, and god forbid ever having and desire for sex anymore...however that 20 something at the gym has been promising to take you to lunch for the longest time.

Perhaps I just talk to people a lot, and hear a lot of stories....thing is the world is a small place, you hear the same story just a different set of names...you almost can narrow down the ending from the first 2 sentences.

[my little story]
In my divorce, she literally went insane...this is why I think it's so funny when others talk of insanity, screwing your best friend is not insanity it's spite, buying a $2000 wardrobe when you are 3 months past due on your mortgage is not insanity it's stupidity/selfishness, etc...Insanity is when the person has no clear understanding what they just said to a group of 5 people and then begin a screaming and glass/object throwing barrage against them because 'you' must have influenced them to make it up and then 10 minutes later forget all about it and want everyone to come back over tomorrow to hang out again as they are all leaving early. Insanity is telling someone the cat you are now holding was just yesterday torn in half and hanging on the walls of your living room. Insanity is in the hallway of the courthouse asking if your now divorced husband would pay your car payment for sex once a week or 'so'. I suppose insanity would be even marrying me to begin with, but that is another story. ;)

She broke her neck and almost died twice during about 6 months worth of stay in the hospital. I slept there during it in a chair (not trying to be the martyr here, just stating what I did) and people would bring me clothes to change into for the next day and what not, we got along very well during this time. Once she healed and started working I got her a better job (she was working for $5-6 or something at her family's laundry in 1995 which was extremely labor intensive and not a good environment for her recovering from major surgery) at about $9 and doing clerical work at the bank I worked for. A nice and cozy 9-5 job with benefits with her own desk, her own phone and computer. She began coming unglued during this time and started spending approx $50-100 per day, treating everyone to lunch, buying clothes for friends, etc. She was self conscious of certain scarring, although it was invisible to most (the hip where bone was taken could be hid in her thong band even and the back of her neck was well hidden by her hair, but they were prominent scars). She also kept worrying the second surgery would eventually fail...her first one did when her parents told her she had to start working again and that living off our savings was lazy.

Then she started doing drugs yet she knew nothing about them, she'd take whatever someone offered and mix it up with alcohol...she began missing work, blanking out there, coming in in ultra mini's (conservative bank), etc. Her friends were calling me and her parents for help...her parents thought it was me. We'd talk a lot still, like I said she lost the concept of reality...we eventually began talking about her new lovers and if they were right for her, yet the next day when we were apart she'd tell anyone that'd listen how evil I was.

I was told I should beat her, take away her money, etc....it's was not my place to do so. That's the facts, she was an adult. I could only choose to accept her new life or not. If I didn't it was up to me to walk. I made her a decent divorce offer, she decided to run to her dad and get an attorney. In the end, the deal was better for me that I got (a 50/50 distribution of assets/liabilities, I offered to leave her everything but my car and electronics/tools and I would take all the debt). All the money that we both were given from her lawsuit, as well as my own savings I had been working on since my teens was gone. At the time of the divorce hearing our joint checkbook was negative $3000.00, fortunately or unfortunately the bank stopped paying after $2000 in the hole..all our credit cards which I had for years and never used were maxed and overdrafted, she had pulled all of our credit line out as well leaving no equity in the house. Fortunately I had enough possessions to liquidate and pay off almost everyone. I had to finance the short fall on the payoff of our house with a one year loan. One of the judge's few comments was never seeing such a pair of young professionals go from such a promising start to beyond the point where many file bankruptcy (something like that).

During this time (leading up to the divorce) she was telling everyone crazy things about me. That I would bring back women to the hospital when I was staying with her, I tore one of my cats in half on day and hung the pieces on the wall, I used drugs, I was in gangs, I slept with her best friend (who later got pissed at her for making that up and actually 3 years later I ended up in a 2-3 year relationship with)....finally the bank fired her, her friends (that were not my friends at all) stopped talking to her, etc.

I kept it quiet. To me it was embarrassing and at the time I thought I was the failure because I couldn't allow her to spend so much yet I was able to buy her a house, a new camaro, nice clothes and jewelry, pets, trips, etc. I found myself blaiming me, not her and found out that is very common.

This lead up to the point in time where there was another guy with my same name at the place. I had already left working there for school and had ran into her on campus actually. She insisted I followed her there (this was about 4 years after the divorce) and ran away. That night I got a call from my ex-girlfriend that was her ex-best friend telling me her boyfriend called the guy with my name thinking it was me and was told he was going to kill him in the parking lot. Well it was like a SWAT movie at the bank, he was escorted out and the whole 9 yards. Now that is insanity too. However I don't go into every divorce thread and say 'OH MY EX SHE'S A DRUG SLUT!' 'SHE'S THE DEBIL!!!'.

When all was said and done financially I have only recently recovered. I had no attorney costs on the deal, it was purely the result of her racking up tens of thousands in debt jointly, and then not paying on debts we had during the three months I left the home. Her smartest move was writing checks out of our account (which I left her access to since she was getting the bills) to herself in the bill amounts. I would call the bank and hear "Check #123 in the amount of $810.00 cleared 8/1/1997" (the amount of our mortgage)...however later on I would discover check #123 was made payable to herself.

I got involved with the wrong girl. Her family is very religious and use it to present themselves in a 'holier than thou' framework. People (we both had a lot of friends) keep calling me with stories about them all the time, her cousin that bought my house has apparently borrowed against it 3 or 4 times now and each time shortly after has been arrested with enough drugs on his person to get first degree felony charges, her younger sister ran away at 17 with a 40 year old convict in a motorcycle gang recently resurfaced divorced and with two kids when he took off again for another younger girl, my ex has a few small claims court filings against her, her rich grandfather died after a prolonged condition and her dad immediately had the grandmother institutionalized (she was the one caring for the grandfather and was totally healthy)....he took possession of apparently about 1 million in liquid assets and within three months the grandmother died, her dad also liquidated my exes trust account (UGTMA where he was the custodian) when she was hit by a drunk driver as a toddler (approx maturity would have been $150,000; we were advised to sue him by the bank as it was clear the money was not used to benefit her)...I always say I really have no cares about it, but it is entertaining to hear. The stories though let me know more about what I had married into and I am sure other's also have equally crazy tales.

When all was through I figured out people just do things sometimes. They don't intend to hurt you as much as it does, however, it's their life they want to lead. You have people that are totally ok with their spouses sleeping around and others that get tyrantical if another even looks at them. To each their own.

[/my little story]

In psychology this is discussed also. You will find the guilty party attempting to discredit the innocent one through lies and deceit. Not that anything is 100%, but those guilty have things to hide and feel the need to validate themselves, give themselves creditials.

I must have missed that one.

Check out his links...

Å
 

Pliablemoose

Lifer
Oct 11, 1999
25,195
0
56
alkemyst, your ex had a brain injury, there's a difference.

How did she break her neck?

BTW, it's called projection.
 

Geekbabe

Moderator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
Oct 16, 1999
32,229
2,539
126
www.theshoppinqueen.com
I'm divorced 14 yrs now and I can tell you this,no amount of hiring lawyers and going to court will turn a vengeful,crappy parent into a loving,supportive person.In many cases this is probably why the divorce happened to begin with.You just muddle thru as best you can,do your best by the kids in whatever time you have with them and try to stay sane if the lot you drew means you get the kids 24/7 with no practical or fiscal supports from the other parent.


I will say this getting handed total responsibilty 24/7 for the kids and 100% of the fiscal obligation for supporting them is probably a lot easier in the day to day than dealing with a vindictive,vengeful former spouse. I did the best I could for my children with the resources I had available to me.I wish there had been more money,more time but if wishes were horses everybody would ride wouldn't they?
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
alkemyst, your ex had a brain injury, there's a difference.

How did she break her neck?

Not quite brain. It was a break in the base of the skull. She was luckily born with a larger 'hole' in the vertebrae that allowed the cord to twist without shearing. Christopher Reeves broke his neck in the same location pretty much and his celebrity status sort of helped our case (it was about the same time during spring break 1995). They had to take a chunk of bone from her hip and fuse it to the back of her spine. She was forced into a rigid neck brace and stuck in the hospital a long ass time. The alternative would be a 'HALO' but that leaves visible scars which she feared.

The accident happened when an old lady was window shopping at 45mph and didn't see my wife stopped at a red light. The impact totalled our Honda Accord Hatchback, it looked like silly putty in the back. Thing is even then I did not find out anything until about 8 hours after the fact (I was working) when no one was home at her families place we were staying at (Spring Break from the University of Florida)....I had to make all these phone calls until I found someone home....she was ok, but had gone to the hospital earlier for xrays and cat scan or mri...everyone was now eating (without me).

We were supposed to leave for Gainesville that night....we rented a car, packed our stuff and headed up, everyone said she was ok....when we got home there was a message that we needed to 'trauma hawk' her back to the hospital as they discovered her neck was broken.

She wanted me to drive her after her parents told her the 'helicopter ride' would be thousands of dollars....so we went to sleep that night, stopped by our schools in the morning to withdraw, and got back on the road. It was almost a year later that she could go out again and do anything fun. During that time she had 2 surgeries the 1st one did not take which I blame on her family having her work in the laundry (her doctor said desk jobs only if she were to work I found out later...I didn't know she was working at all, she claimed to just be going to the job to talk to relatives)..then she fought having to go back for another surgery....it's probably one of the worst things I could imagine, I think during the second time is when she snapped....I saw her unravelling, but her family chased off all the recommended counselling the hospital and her doctor recommended.

&Aring;
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
Originally posted by: Geekbabe
if wishes were horses everybody would ride wouldn't they?

Well I would hope so, but based on some of the pictures I have seen on the internet I am sure some would have different intentions. :Q
 

SaigonK

Diamond Member
Aug 13, 2001
7,482
3
0
www.robertrivas.com
Divorces are 50/50, no matter what anyone says. Each person has options and they make mistakes and commit errors.
Mine is no different. I wouldnt be offended by your statements (Alkymest) if you werent implying that i am somehow guilty of more or less than my stbx, when you clearly only take your opinion based upon the guilt you must have for your divorce.

I am not a monster, and I would not say my wife is either, she's a good mother and I am a good father. But divorce makes people change, and we are both changing. She is controlling and wants her way, i want her to relax and see things my way..thus our disagreement.

It isnt rocket science, there is no hidden agenda to make her suffer or go broke or to take my kids form her. Its called my rights a s a parent to see my children, a right she feels I should not have because she is mad at me for the things she feels I have fdone wrong. The difference between us is I would not limit her time with the kids because I dont like her anymore, this is what makes her wrong (in my opinion).

 

SaigonK

Diamond Member
Aug 13, 2001
7,482
3
0
www.robertrivas.com
Alos, I am not begging for money, the total website was a way to show people how much a divorce can cost if you dont get aling.
If people want to donate to help me pay for my lawyers, why should I refuse? Hell my stbx is getting money from her father so she can prolong the fight, she doesnt have the cash to fight, but she is getting help to so i am wrong for people wanting to help out?

 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,808
83
91
I'm a big fan of divorices. my parents decided to "stay together for the kids," despite the fact that they obviously dislike eachother (sleep in different bedrooms, mom goes out of town almost every weekend, and dad works 60-70 hours per week). led to both my sister and I having pretty demented views on what relationships should be.

sister seems to be over her issues (been with the same guy for 3 years, and they seem pretty happy... hopefully they'll stay happy, since that guy is also my boss :p). I'm at least aware enough of my issues that when I see myself falling into old patterns (going passive-agressive, deliberately avoid talking about problems in the relationship, etc), I can at least force myself out of them.


just a random contribution... it's 9 am and I'm bored. the guys coming in to relieve me from my shift are running late. lalalalala...
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
Originally posted by: SaigonK
Divorces are 50/50, no matter what anyone says. Each person has options and they make mistakes and commit errors.
Mine is no different. I wouldnt be offended by your statements (Alkymest) if you werent implying that i am somehow guilty of more or less than my stbx, when you clearly only take your opinion based upon the guilt you must have for your divorce.

Nice try on playing a reversal of roles there. You are now just recanting words I have said previously as your own and now saying I feel this lingering guilt? Don't quit your day job.

I am not a monster, and I would not say my wife is either, she's a good mother and I am a good father. But divorce makes people change, and we are both changing. She is controlling and wants her way, i want her to relax and see things my way..thus our disagreement.

From other threads as well as this one there is a lot to say about ethics and how you approach things. You claim she is controlling and wants her way....that whole statement is flawed with 'wants her way', who doesn't? That point is moot.

Who is really the one attempting for control, everything you have stated comes from the facts that you want to control your kids, you want to control the vacation time, you want to control holiday visits. Sounds to me she is more or less trying to keep the status quo by doing the holidays together and what not.

It isnt rocket science, there is no hidden agenda to make her suffer or go broke or to take my kids form her. Its called my rights a s a parent to see my children, a right she feels I should not have because she is mad at me for the things she feels I have fdone wrong. The difference between us is I would not limit her time with the kids because I dont like her anymore, this is what makes her wrong (in my opinion).

Again I seriously doubt your hidden agendas, just the fact that your 'cost of a divorce' site was a pure and simple way to get everyone to see your paypal link...that's unethical if you ask me. You say that people are lining up to donate to you though? must be nice. I have seen nothing previously in her trying to benefit your time with the kids, the only limits you have explained is the out of state trip which is understandable. She is wanting to spend time all together, hardly someone that is out to get you as you are her.

Seriously it doubtful you will see this situation clearly ever, but I am willing to bet a court/family mediator would have you saying "they are on her side, they must be friends, etc".

&Aring;
 

SaigonK

Diamond Member
Aug 13, 2001
7,482
3
0
www.robertrivas.com
Dont judge peoples situations without knowing them, you left a brain damaged woman and now I am guilty of being untrue and unclear? Give me a break.

As for the my side/her side, where the hell did you get that from Frnakly I dont know where you are gettig any of your statements from, youre pulling supposed facts and behavoir out of the air. My site wasnt to get peope to my paypal link and i dont have to explain my want to pay my bills with help. Divorce isnt cheap, take alook around you its getting more expensive by the day.

Secondly, you dont know my ex form a hole in the ground and yet you seem to defend her as a good natured person. You could not be further form the reality of it all. Before you open up and say anything, get over your own situation and think clearl. Not everyone was trolled like you were, not everone left their ex standing holding the bag as you apparently feel guilty for doing,


 

SaigonK

Diamond Member
Aug 13, 2001
7,482
3
0
www.robertrivas.com
Also i dont recant nor do I apoligize for anythign i have ever said, its the truth and you dont have any ground to rebutt me on it. Meet my stbx, then you can have a say...outside of that just thread crap like usual and then move on.
No one said I am innocent, but to think my stbx is innocent and trying to keep up the status quo is ridiculous.
 

KarenMarie

Elite Member
Sep 20, 2003
14,372
6
81
I would like to jump in here and throw a few things out there :)

Alkemyst, I am sorry that you had to go thru what you did. I understand fully. From the other side. I was married to a cold, unfeeling, bitter man. I was misdiagnosed as BiPolar and was given a myriad of pills for years. Really went off the deep end at one point. Threw a video player out the 2nd fl window (right thru the glass) set the bed on fire, and loads of other stuff. I was verbally vicious one minute and couldnt understand why we werent holding hands and smooching the next minute. He was mean and fighting his own demons and the meds I was on really made me emotionally unbalanced. I say I was misdiagnosed, cause after more then six years of being given all kinds of med cocktails, I find that all I needed was some counselling and I am fine. I had moved to a new country, left my family, friends, job and married an emotionally cold man with issues from his past. I should have had counselling then, but they just medicated me and the fun really began. So, I have some idea what you went thru. And I extend my sympathies.

SaigonK, I looked at your pictures. You children are young (and beautiful) and this is really tough on them, no doubt. I remember from your earlier post that you said that you were crushed and that you would want to work things thru. Perhaps all this anger and bitterness has made you change your mind. Someone very close to me had serious issues with their marriage. They got loads of help here:
Text
I would suggest that you browse around there. There is loads of stuff there on making divorce bearable and healing hurts. It would especially be good for you to learn about how to deal with the kids and stuff.
As far as going on vacation, and her wanting to be involved in your family gatherings... My opinion is this... Your children should suffer as little as possible while this 'transition' takes place. They are hurt and scared and confused enough. I would think that they would need as much normalcy as possible and also need being around family as much as possible. Hopefully that will reinforce some sense of ... just because mommy and daddy are not married anymore doesnt mean there is no more family. A fun trip is not gonna fix anything in their hearts, but it will give them some hope that all is not lost. My maternal heart soooo goes out to them.

Your wife has decided that she no longer wants to be married to you. This means that she is no longer automatically invloved in family functions as your wife. I said that before and I will say it again. She has elected to remove herself from that role and is no longer automatically entitled to the benefits of it. It was said that if your family still wants her there, she should still be invited. Dunno, I might have a different type of family, but they would never invite an ex of mine unless it was ok with me. Their loyalty would be with me. I know that if my daughter and her b/f split, I would never invite him over unless she wanted him there and they were still friends. I also feel that while all of this is up in the air, it would kinda give the kids mixed signals as to what is happening. I know I said that things should be as 'normal' as possible, as far as the trip goes, but to me, this is different. A clear signal along the lines of... mommy and daddy are not together anymore, and my family has changed, but I still have families on either side even if they are not together... is kinda what I mean. Show the kids that they are still loved, and still have family, but draw a CLEAR line!

It seems that things have gotten really ugly for your family. Again, I suggest that you click that link and see if you cannot find something there that will help heal and make things easier for you.

GodSpeed!
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
Originally posted by: SaigonK
Dont judge peoples situations without knowing them, you left a brain damaged woman and now I am guilty of being untrue and unclear? Give me a break.

You are having anger management issues. You aren't thinking rashly...you keep trying to bash me on something that is resolved to me, you do realise we spoke of each other's infidelity while in bed with each other. If I can accept that chances are anything an external source can bring to me is going to be moot.

Again I will say you are the one that has to only choose two things...Can you stay in or are you out?

If out, she is still 'Mommy' to your kids....in all your past explainations she really has only had merely a different opinion to life than you. I have no doubt based on what you have said she is a totally fit mother. You I can almost guarantee are in retaliation. It's natural, but not the right thing.

As for the my side/her side, where the hell did you get that from Frnakly I dont know where you are gettig any of your statements from, youre pulling supposed facts and behavoir out of the air. My site wasnt to get peope to my paypal link and i dont have to explain my want to pay my bills with help. Divorce isnt cheap, take alook around you its getting more expensive by the day.

My wife spent about $6k, I got a better deal going to court....my cost was $0 ... I was even to work by 10am the day of the trial. With kids yes you are going to incur some costs...but I have been around a ton of divorces...it's just part of the life down here I think. Most times the winners are merely the attorneys.

Secondly, you dont know my ex form a hole in the ground and yet you seem to defend her as a good natured person. You could not be further form the reality of it all. Before you open up and say anything, get over your own situation and think clearl. Not everyone was trolled like you were, not everone left their ex standing holding the bag as you apparently feel guilty for doing,

You are right I have no idea who she is other than your accounting. From this I cannot see your side and from your lashing out like a child, I don't think you can either. My ex-wife was hardly left holding the bag....if anything when her grandfather dies a few years later and she inherited about $100k after taxes she was free and clear and ahead of the ball while I was and still am paying for certain things. You say I was trolled...but that's really wrong I merely sampled a lot of what life has to offer. Some things leave scars, other's happiness.

I am not one to get all kissy kissy with a lister with a problem like many do. I try to see what's being presented and answer accurately. I never take sides blindly. I have never said your stbx is 100% in the right, however from what you have presented I will say you are not. So, somewhere in between you both will meet and I am merely trying to open your eyes to that before you have spent a small fortune only to be told, in the end, you are only part right.

Here's the deal in reality with my ex. Sane or Insane she has a match out there. That *match* will die for her, without regard for the reality of the situation. They would die happy defending her. They would be wrong. However, they would not care and that's all that matters.

Unfortunately (or fortunately) that person was not me.

&Aring;
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
kariemarie: Some would agree with you and some wouldn't about the total split of exes from a family, 1-2 years sure....10-20 years probably not....my 2nd grandmother is a huge part of a large family, my blood grandmother and father grew apart, they divorced amicably and he remarried and she had a lover/companion until her death as well that was called "uncle" by other's in the family. They would be together at many functions and they both actually became dear friends.

In family functions yes she would no longer be your wife, however, she will always be the mother of the children (and in reverse father)....more often than not, no one else sees the same conflict the marital couple does. To them she or he is still the sweet person they grew to love as their own. My own parents do not ever do the 'blood if thicker than water, kill the bish' thing, and I appreciate that. I will say one of the #1 breaking issues of parents and kids is parents that will team up against a current lover with their child and later the child ends up making that 'outcast' a spouse...you will set yourself up as the grandparents that are the burden to work into the holidays.

Forcing them to choose is unfair and unfair for the kids....in all seriousness it's these battles that screw up children of divorced parents the most...they learn to see themselves as the burden and the conflict.

I would have no problem sitting down with my ex-wife's mother for a chat, although the thought of it would drive my ex into a frenzy a la SWAT at an ex employer. Most of the problems involve displaced resolution to the situation. It's either one is p!ssed they were the breakee of the relationship, the one cheated on, the one that got requited love, etc. It becomes a life long revenge thing. Myself I have seen it all....perhaps one day my current wife will talk to me of an infidelity or something worse...it's just part of life, I will guarantee if it happened she was never thinking "oh screw him, look at what I will do" but rather "I can't keep my heart from this any longer!".

Then I would stand down and move on.

&Aring;
 

Williama1018

Member
Feb 18, 2004
55
0
0
Saigon, I really wish u all the best with this situation. I have been there and lost a ton over it, if you ever want to talk, drop me a line. I am NOT getting on this thread to debate who's right or wrong, just to offer an ear if you need to talk from someone that has been there before. I also have two daughters that went thru this and understand ur concern about your kids. For those who dont understand this, fathers can be extremely attached to daughters, and feel the need to guard they're angels. I did this myself, I gave my ex EVERYTHING, i literally walked out of 7 rental properties, our home, two cars and took a tv, computer and my clothes because I thought it was best for my kids and agreed to pay her support even tho the rental's were bringing in 4 grand a month. Some have missed what Saigon is really trying to do here, he simply is using this forum as a way to get sh[t off of his chest, to "have a voice". He is appearantly comfortable here and figured he could do so without being blasted, appearantly not. I'm sure he did not come here for emotional counseling or financial gain, as this is a computer forum, unless my damn internet explorer is screwed up AGAIN lol. Anyways, i'm not getting into who's right or wrong, IF you want to BS Saigon, feel free to email me or PM me here. Good luck and best wishes for you and your kids.