George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

BOBDN

Banned
May 21, 2002
2,579
0
0
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: KAMAZON
Read this slow ok...

Prescott at the time was an investment banker with Brown Brothers Harriman (BBH), which had funneled U.S. capital into Germany during the 1920s and '30s. Among the seized companies was the Union Banking Corporation (UBC) of New York, which was controlled by German industrialist Fritz Thyssen.

Prescott Bush, for his part, owned a single share of stock (of 4,000) in UBC

I've done my research, and now you read this slow, since it gets even worse for you:

Presscott Bush was the "Managing Director" of the bank, as his official title. The reason he had 1 stock, because that is what they give the managing director. His bosses brother, Roland Harriman, owned 3900 of the Shares.
Sigh....let me just copy and paste my response to you in another thread...

What research have you done? Let me guess....you read some more of LaRouche's ranting.....ohhhh that's research all right. Funny how you are willing to accept any kind of research except for the academic kind. Ohh academia...it's soooo bad....you can't trust anyone who has ever stepped foot on a university campus.

I never said Prescott Bush was kicked out of the Harriman business, what I said was that he resigned in 1931....see that resigned in 1931...that's a historical fact. He was still on the board, but did not attend regular meetings and stayed on the board as more of a gesture of friendship than anything else. You also keep ignoring the fact that the Nazis seized the bank fro themselves in 1938....a good 4 years before it's business in the U.S. was seized and shut down. You also keep ignoring the fact that hundreds, if not thousands, of other German businesses were seized in the U.S. Many of them had no ties at all to the Nazi movement and were simply owned by a German company.

The Nazis siezed a US bank?

And this one DID have ties to the Nazis.

Prescott Bush made $1.5 million from his one share. In 1940's dollars.

 

BOBDN

Banned
May 21, 2002
2,579
0
0
"Prescott Bush received $1.5 million for his share in UBC. That money enabled Bush to help his son, George Herbert Walker Bush, to set up his first royalty firm, Overby Development Company, that same year. It was also helpful when Prescott Bush left the business world to enter the public arena in 1952 with a successful senatorial campaign in Connecticut. On October 8th, 1972, Prescott Bush died of cancer and his will was enacted soon after." - Page 3 of:


Link
 

shiner

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
17,112
1
0
Originally posted by: BOBDN
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: KAMAZON
Read this slow ok...

Prescott at the time was an investment banker with Brown Brothers Harriman (BBH), which had funneled U.S. capital into Germany during the 1920s and '30s. Among the seized companies was the Union Banking Corporation (UBC) of New York, which was controlled by German industrialist Fritz Thyssen.

Prescott Bush, for his part, owned a single share of stock (of 4,000) in UBC

I've done my research, and now you read this slow, since it gets even worse for you:

Presscott Bush was the "Managing Director" of the bank, as his official title. The reason he had 1 stock, because that is what they give the managing director. His bosses brother, Roland Harriman, owned 3900 of the Shares.
Sigh....let me just copy and paste my response to you in another thread...

What research have you done? Let me guess....you read some more of LaRouche's ranting.....ohhhh that's research all right. Funny how you are willing to accept any kind of research except for the academic kind. Ohh academia...it's soooo bad....you can't trust anyone who has ever stepped foot on a university campus.

I never said Prescott Bush was kicked out of the Harriman business, what I said was that he resigned in 1931....see that resigned in 1931...that's a historical fact. He was still on the board, but did not attend regular meetings and stayed on the board as more of a gesture of friendship than anything else. You also keep ignoring the fact that the Nazis seized the bank fro themselves in 1938....a good 4 years before it's business in the U.S. was seized and shut down. You also keep ignoring the fact that hundreds, if not thousands, of other German businesses were seized in the U.S. Many of them had no ties at all to the Nazi movement and were simply owned by a German company.

The Nazis siezed a US bank?

And this one DID have ties to the Nazis.

Prescott Bush made $1.5 million from his one share. In 1940's dollars.
UBC was an American bank controlled by a German named Fritz Thyssen. Thyssen was an Industrialist with many, many holdings. He fled the country in 1938 and the German Govt seized all his businesses. Thus UBC came under control of the German govt. The twist that is coming in the fact that LaRouche/KAMAZON, etc... keep making is that Bush was funneling moneyto the Nazi party. That is simply untrue and anyone that bothers to do some reading, real reading of facts not made up stuff and 1/2 truths could see that.

 

shiner

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
17,112
1
0
Originally posted by: BOBDN
"Prescott Bush received $1.5 million for his share in UBC. That money enabled Bush to help his son, George Herbert Walker Bush, to set up his first royalty firm, Overby Development Company, that same year. It was also helpful when Prescott Bush left the business world to enter the public arena in 1952 with a successful senatorial campaign in Connecticut. On October 8th, 1972, Prescott Bush died of cancer and his will was enacted soon after." - Page 3 of:


Link
Yeah...that looks like a legit site...

Let me quote a little from www.straightdope.com

An article by journalist Toby Rogers posted on Loftus's Web site makes an even more explosive charge. Another company in which Prescott and his associates had a stake was the Silesian-American Corporation (SAC), which owned several industrial concerns in Poland. The Auschwitz death camp was established in a district where SAC already had a steel plant. The plant allegedly used forced labor from Auschwitz during World War II. The article asserts that "a portion of the slave labor force in Poland was 'managed by Prescott Bush,' according to a Dutch intelligence agent." (See www.john-loftus.com/Thyssen.asp.)

The slave labor charge is easy to dismiss. SAC plants in Poland were taken over by the German government after the Nazi invasion of 1939, and the Auschwitz prison camp wasn't established until 1940. No one can seriously claim that Prescott Bush managed camp inmates in any of those plants.




 

burnedout

Diamond Member
Oct 12, 1999
6,249
2
0
Originally posted by: BOBDN
You can find another here.

That one share of Prescott's stock was worth $1.5 million.
Yep, and all it represents is a slightly more refined version of the original trash. Just received a service call, so this one must wait before I can be rip it a new one too.
 

BOBDN

Banned
May 21, 2002
2,579
0
0
Originally posted by: burnedout
Originally posted by: BOBDN
You can find another here.

That one share of Prescott's stock was worth $1.5 million.
Yep, and all it represents is a slightly more refined version of the original trash. Just received a service call, so this one must wait before I can be rip it a new one too.

So everyone is wrong about Bush except the people you agree with?

Truth is usually found somewhere in the middle.

 

BOBDN

Banned
May 21, 2002
2,579
0
0
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: BOBDN
"Prescott Bush received $1.5 million for his share in UBC. That money enabled Bush to help his son, George Herbert Walker Bush, to set up his first royalty firm, Overby Development Company, that same year. It was also helpful when Prescott Bush left the business world to enter the public arena in 1952 with a successful senatorial campaign in Connecticut. On October 8th, 1972, Prescott Bush died of cancer and his will was enacted soon after." - Page 3 of:


Link
Yeah...that looks like a legit site...

Let me quote a little from www.straightdope.com

An article by journalist Toby Rogers posted on Loftus's Web site makes an even more explosive charge. Another company in which Prescott and his associates had a stake was the Silesian-American Corporation (SAC), which owned several industrial concerns in Poland. The Auschwitz death camp was established in a district where SAC already had a steel plant. The plant allegedly used forced labor from Auschwitz during World War II. The article asserts that "a portion of the slave labor force in Poland was 'managed by Prescott Bush,' according to a Dutch intelligence agent." (See www.john-loftus.com/Thyssen.asp.)

The slave labor charge is easy to dismiss. SAC plants in Poland were taken over by the German government after the Nazi invasion of 1939, and the Auschwitz prison camp wasn't established until 1940. No one can seriously claim that Prescott Bush managed camp inmates in any of those plants.

Prescott Bush received his payoff after WWII ended. So was he making money from his business dealings with Nazis throughout WWII?
 

shiner

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
17,112
1
0
Originally posted by: BOBDN
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: BOBDN
"Prescott Bush received $1.5 million for his share in UBC. That money enabled Bush to help his son, George Herbert Walker Bush, to set up his first royalty firm, Overby Development Company, that same year. It was also helpful when Prescott Bush left the business world to enter the public arena in 1952 with a successful senatorial campaign in Connecticut. On October 8th, 1972, Prescott Bush died of cancer and his will was enacted soon after." - Page 3 of:


Link
Yeah...that looks like a legit site...

Let me quote a little from www.straightdope.com

An article by journalist Toby Rogers posted on Loftus's Web site makes an even more explosive charge. Another company in which Prescott and his associates had a stake was the Silesian-American Corporation (SAC), which owned several industrial concerns in Poland. The Auschwitz death camp was established in a district where SAC already had a steel plant. The plant allegedly used forced labor from Auschwitz during World War II. The article asserts that "a portion of the slave labor force in Poland was 'managed by Prescott Bush,' according to a Dutch intelligence agent." (See www.john-loftus.com/Thyssen.asp.)

The slave labor charge is easy to dismiss. SAC plants in Poland were taken over by the German government after the Nazi invasion of 1939, and the Auschwitz prison camp wasn't established until 1940. No one can seriously claim that Prescott Bush managed camp inmates in any of those plants.

Prescott Bush received his payoff after WWII ended. So was he making money from his business dealings with Nazis throughout WWII?
No, the U.S. govt. seized the bank in 1942...it was after all an American bank that was controlled by a German industiralist until he fled Germany in 1938. After the bank was seized by the U.S. it was controlled by the U.S. and operated normally. After WWII and an investigation into all the companies seized during the war stockholders in cleared companies were allowed to sale their shares if the desired. Tell me....how is that profiting from dealing with the Nazis?

 

KAMAZON

Golden Member
Apr 4, 2001
1,300
0
76
www.alirazeghi.com
No, the U.S. govt. seized the bank in 1942...it was after all an American bank that was controlled by a German industiralist until he fled Germany in 1938. After the bank was seized by the U.S. it was controlled by the U.S. and operated normally. After WWII and an investigation into all the companies seized during the war stockholders in cleared companies were allowed to sale their shares if the desired. Tell me....how is that profiting from dealing with the Nazis?

The charges aren't because they were profiting, but because they were trading. Also, further research has brought up even more damning evidence which I have replied in my other thread with even MORE dealings with the Nazis by this same crowd through Standard Oil and William Farrish.
 

KAMAZON

Golden Member
Apr 4, 2001
1,300
0
76
www.alirazeghi.com
Quote

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I never said Prescott Bush was kicked out of the Harriman business, what I said was that he resigned in 1931....see that resigned in 1931...that's a historical fact. He was still on the board, but did not attend regular meetings and stayed on the board as more of a gesture of friendship than anything else.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



How convienent, he 'resigned' in 1931, but was still the Managing Director on the board of Directors, and of course, he didn't want to hurt poor little Harrimans feelings so he stayed on 'to show he is a friend'. A "gesture of Friendship" to a company that was funding the Nazis.




Quote

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. You also keep ignoring the fact that the Nazis seized the bank fro themselves in 1938....a good 4 years before it's business in the U.S. was seized and shut down.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The Nazis siezed Bush and Harrimans "Union Bank" for themselves in 1938? I think you have your facts messed up. How the hell did the Nazis sieze a NY Bank in 1938 when FDR shut it down in 1942? I think you mean to say that htey siezed THYSSIN STEEL, not the bank in 1938, which by the way, doesn't make your argument any better that 'well, thyssin didn't own it, the Nazi party owned it'.




Finally, I will research the dealing of Bushes bank with the Nazis after 1938 to see if htey continued supporting them even after the war started. Regardless, at a bare minimum, their dealings and fascination with the Eugenics rascist "Master Race" movement, working with the Nazi war companies who carried out Eugenics policies and ideologies even before the war started should not be made 'light' of, unless of course, you're a shmuck.

The company that I DID find which DID continue to work with the Nazis in 1942 without a doubt, was Standard Oil. William Farrish was the collaberator with Presscott Bush in this Rockefeller/Standard Oil crowd which caused a congressoinal investigation in 1942, since the war started, and this company was still working with the Nazis. Farrish 'commited suicide' and his grandson took over. Farrishes grandson is the handler for the Bush family money now, and was made Ambassador to Britain under the first (maybe the present) Bush administrator, so it is still a 'family ran business'.


Do you dare to excuse these acts of rascism of sponsering the Eugenics movement, working with teh Nazis directly upto the war (And dont give me this crap that 'they didn't know the Nazis were bad', everyone knew the Nazis were rascist extremists), then at a bare minimum, continuing to do oil contracts with the Naizs through Standard Oil with William Farrish? Even if you throw up some kind of lame defence for working for Farrish with working with the Nazis, Presscotts own actions as manager of that bank are damning.

The funny thing is, here you have someone with direct links to the Nazis before and after the war started, while LaRouche was training american soldiers to fight the Nazis, then LaRouche fought for Indian Independance; yet "LaRouche is supposidly a fascist rascist". You must live in the world of Laputa in Gullivers Travels where everything is backwards.
 

shiner

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
17,112
1
0
Originally posted by: KAMAZON
No, the U.S. govt. seized the bank in 1942...it was after all an American bank that was controlled by a German industiralist until he fled Germany in 1938. After the bank was seized by the U.S. it was controlled by the U.S. and operated normally. After WWII and an investigation into all the companies seized during the war stockholders in cleared companies were allowed to sale their shares if the desired. Tell me....how is that profiting from dealing with the Nazis?

The charges aren't because they were profiting, but because they were trading. Also, further research has brought up even more damning evidence which I have replied in my other thread with even MORE dealings with the Nazis by this same crowd through Standard Oil and William Farrish.
Yeah...go read my response to your accusations about Standard Oil...once again you are using 1/2 truths. Yes, Standard worked with the German oil industry in the 1920's and early 1930's but stopped after Hitler seized power in 1934.

 

shiner

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
17,112
1
0
Originally posted by: KAMAZON
Quote

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I never said Prescott Bush was kicked out of the Harriman business, what I said was that he resigned in 1931....see that resigned in 1931...that's a historical fact. He was still on the board, but did not attend regular meetings and stayed on the board as more of a gesture of friendship than anything else.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



How convienent, he 'resigned' in 1931, but was still the Managing Director on the board of Directors, and of course, he didn't want to hurt poor little Harrimans feelings so he stayed on 'to show he is a friend'. A "gesture of Friendship" to a company that was funding the Nazis.




Quote

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. You also keep ignoring the fact that the Nazis seized the bank fro themselves in 1938....a good 4 years before it's business in the U.S. was seized and shut down.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The Nazis siezed Bush and Harrimans "Union Bank" for themselves in 1938? I think you have your facts messed up. How the hell did the Nazis sieze a NY Bank in 1938 when FDR shut it down in 1942? I think you mean to say that htey siezed THYSSIN STEEL, not the bank in 1938, which by the way, doesn't make your argument any better that 'well, thyssin didn't own it, the Nazi party owned it'.




Finally, I will research the dealing of Bushes bank with the Nazis after 1938 to see if htey continued supporting them even after the war started. Regardless, at a bare minimum, their dealings and fascination with the Eugenics rascist "Master Race" movement, working with the Nazi war companies who carried out Eugenics policies and ideologies even before the war started should not be made 'light' of, unless of course, you're a shmuck.

The company that I DID find which DID continue to work with the Nazis in 1942 without a doubt, was Standard Oil. William Farrish was the collaberator with Presscott Bush in this Rockefeller/Standard Oil crowd which caused a congressoinal investigation in 1942, since the war started, and this company was still working with the Nazis. Farrish 'commited suicide' and his grandson took over. Farrishes grandson is the handler for the Bush family money now, and was made Ambassador to Britain under the first (maybe the present) Bush administrator, so it is still a 'family ran business'.


Do you dare to excuse these acts of rascism of sponsering the Eugenics movement, working with teh Nazis directly upto the war (And dont give me this crap that 'they didn't know the Nazis were bad', everyone knew the Nazis were rascist extremists), then at a bare minimum, continuing to do oil contracts with the Naizs through Standard Oil with William Farrish? Even if you throw up some kind of lame defence for working for Farrish with working with the Nazis, Presscotts own actions as manager of that bank are damning.

The funny thing is, here you have someone with direct links to the Nazis before and after the war started, while LaRouche was training american soldiers to fight the Nazis, then LaRouche fought for Indian Independance; yet "LaRouche is supposidly a fascist rascist". You must live in the world of Laputa in Gullivers Travels where everything is backwards.

Cut & paste from my response in another thread...

Ok chuckles....see if you can understand this. After Thyssen fled Germany in 38 his assets were seized by the German govt. Among those assets was his controlling interest in UBC bank. Understand that now or do I need to draw you a picture? It cracks me up every time you call UBC "Bush's bank" Why? Because he wasn't even anywhere near the majority in UBC, a fact you continue to ignore.

Secondly....do you even know how a Board of Directors works and how little they have to do with actual day to day business of a company? Probably not....let me just say one thing about that....it is not uncommon for a Board to have one or several positions that are nothing more than ceremonial. For instance my Dad retired from a Board of Directors back in 1995 but he is still on the Board with the title of Vie President. Why? because he served for a long time and even after his retirement they chose to keep a position for him. He no longer attends meetings or has anything to do with the business, yet he still has a title on the Board. Happens all the time.....

As for Standard Oil....here are some facts for you:

"The oil giant developed and financed Germany's synthetic fuel program in partnership with the German chemical giant, I.G. Farben in the 1920's and early 1930's."

"As late as 1934, Germany was forced to import as much as 85% of it's petroleum from abroad. This meant that a worldwide fuel embargo could stop Hitler's army overnight. To get around this threat, Nazi Germany began converting domestic coal into synthetic fuel using processes developed jointly by Standard Oil and I.G. Farben."
(notice it says "as late as 1934, meaning it didn't happen after 34. Hitler didn't seize full power in Germany until 1934)

Yeah...that's pretty damning....NOT! Try doing some none LaRouche based research and getting your facts straight before you post again.

As for Lyndon's military service....he was stationed in Australia from 1944-1946 and was in Burma for a time. Indian war of Independence? Where did you dream that up? After WWII he attended Boston University from 1946-1947 but withdrew in 47 to take a job in the footwear industry. It was in 1947 that India became independent. How did LaRouche manage to be involved in that if he was working in the footwear industry? I guess he made them superpower sandals or something.

Oh....your boy LaRouche is married to a German, Helga Zepp-LaRouche, by your logic that makes him a Nazi.

Once again....please work on your spelling.....

EDITED for quotation marks so Bobdn won't cry.


 

BOBDN

Banned
May 21, 2002
2,579
0
0
1. Bush ran the day to day operations of UBC in New York.

2. See 1.

3. And it's easy to spell correctly when you cut and paste.
 

shiner

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
17,112
1
0
Originally posted by: BOBDN
1. Bush ran the day to day operations of UBC in New York.

2. See 1.

3. And it's easy to spell correctly when you cut and paste.


1. Prove it....everything I've read says otherwise. I'm talking respected sources here....don't feed me any LaRouchian blather.

Cut and paste? Yeah I cut and pasted a couple of sentences in the above, the ones about Standard Oil to be exact, but the rest of my post was all mine baby......sorry to disappoint you.
 

KAMAZON

Golden Member
Apr 4, 2001
1,300
0
76
www.alirazeghi.com
As for Standard Oil....here are some facts for you:

The oil giant developed and financed Germany's synthetic fuel program in partnership with the German chemical giant, I.G. Farben in the 1920's and early 1930's.

As late as 1934, Germany was forced to import as much as 85% of it's petroleum from abroad. This meant that a worldwide fuel embargo could stop Hitler's army overnight. To get around this threat, Nazi Germany began converting domestic coal into synthetic fuel using processes developed jointly by Standard Oil and I.G. Farben.
(notice it says "as late as 1934, meaning it didn't happen after 34. Hitler didn't seize full power in Germany until 1934)

Yeah...that's pretty damning....NOT! Try doing some none LaRouche based research and getting your facts straight before you post again.


You leave out the most damning fact that they were under congressional investigation in 1942 for continuing to supply the Nazis IN 1942 after the war started, which is when Bushes buddy commited suicide. Also, the patents the Nazis got for their synthetic material developed by I.G Farben also came from the Rockefellers. They also tried making synthetic butter from coal, but that didn't work.
 

shiner

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
17,112
1
0
Originally posted by: KAMAZON
As for Standard Oil....here are some facts for you:

The oil giant developed and financed Germany's synthetic fuel program in partnership with the German chemical giant, I.G. Farben in the 1920's and early 1930's.

As late as 1934, Germany was forced to import as much as 85% of it's petroleum from abroad. This meant that a worldwide fuel embargo could stop Hitler's army overnight. To get around this threat, Nazi Germany began converting domestic coal into synthetic fuel using processes developed jointly by Standard Oil and I.G. Farben.
(notice it says "as late as 1934, meaning it didn't happen after 34. Hitler didn't seize full power in Germany until 1934)

Yeah...that's pretty damning....NOT! Try doing some none LaRouche based research and getting your facts straight before you post again.

You leave out the most damning fact that they were under congressional investigation in 1942 for continuing to supply the Nazis IN 1942 after the war started, which is when Bushes buddy commited suicide. Also, the patents the Nazis got for their synthetic material developed by I.G Farben also came from the Rockefellers. They also tried making synthetic butter from coal, but that didn't work.
A congressional investigation does not equal guilt...tell me....what were the results of said investigation???


 

KAMAZON

Golden Member
Apr 4, 2001
1,300
0
76
www.alirazeghi.com
The official charge to Farrish was that he supplied the Nazis the patent to synthetic rubber, which his company, Standard Oil had or developed. Farrish the 1st commited suicide before the hearing, and thus, there was no hearing against him since he was dead.
 

shiner

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
17,112
1
0
Originally posted by: KAMAZON
The official charge to Farrish was that he supplied the Nazis the patent to synthetic rubber, which his company, Standard Oil had or developed. Farrish the 1st commited suicide before the hearing, and thus, there was no hearing against him since he was dead.
So your "proof" is that somone committed suicide. Oooooook.

I guess you chose to totally ignore the fact that Standard stopped working with I.G. Farben when Hitler came to power in 34.....damn facts....they just keep getting in your way don't they?

 

ConclamoLudus

Senior member
Jan 16, 2003
572
0
0
So let me get this straight:

Prescott Bush = George HW Bush = George W Bush = Nazi supporter = Nazi = Hitler

Is this the point of this thread? How do they all coexist at the same time? Amazing.
 

KAMAZON

Golden Member
Apr 4, 2001
1,300
0
76
www.alirazeghi.com
Prescott Bush = George HW Bush = George W Bush = Nazi supporter = Nazi = Hitler

Is this the point of this thread? How do they all coexist at the same time? Amazing.

If you read ANY of my threads, You will see NONE of them are attacking President G. W. Bush on this charge. Lyndon LaRouche doesnt' even attack President Bush, we are goign after to impeach Cheney and the chickenhawks, not Bush. Why do you just ASSume this? This whole post, or at least, all of my arguments were ALL against Presscott and that crowd, it had NOTHING, ZERO, ZIP, ZILCH to do with Dubya. I didn't even mention Dubya. This is a debate on how much Presscott Bush and his crowd supported the Nazis.

 

KAMAZON

Golden Member
Apr 4, 2001
1,300
0
76
www.alirazeghi.com
So your "proof" is that somone committed suicide. Oooooook.

I guess you chose to totally ignore the fact that Standard stopped working with I.G. Farben when Hitler came to power in 34.....damn facts....they just keep getting in your way don't they?

Regardless, whenever *supposidly* Standard stopped working with IG Faben, the Nazis still got the technology and so fourth for synthetic war material which Standard Oil had well after 1934? It was enough for congress to start an investigation farraley for giving the technology to the nazis, and it was enough for Farraley to commit suicide before the investigation started.
 

ConclamoLudus

Senior member
Jan 16, 2003
572
0
0
Originally posted by: KAMAZON
Prescott Bush = George HW Bush = George W Bush = Nazi supporter = Nazi = Hitler

Is this the point of this thread? How do they all coexist at the same time? Amazing.

If you read ANY of my threads, You will see NONE of them are attacking President G. W. Bush on this charge. Lyndon LaRouche doesnt' even attack President Bush, we are goign after to impeach Cheney and the chickenhawks, not Bush. Why do you just ASSume this? This whole post, or at least, all of my arguments were ALL against Presscott and that crowd, it had NOTHING, ZERO, ZIP, ZILCH to do with Dubya. I didn't even mention Dubya. This is a debate on how much Presscott Bush and his crowd supported the Nazis.

Nevermind I thought this was the Unauthorized Biography of George Bush. I ASSumed it was W not HW. I'm an @ss.
 

BOBDN

Banned
May 21, 2002
2,579
0
0
Originally posted by: shinerburke
Originally posted by: BOBDN
1. Bush ran the day to day operations of UBC in New York.

2. See 1.

3. And it's easy to spell correctly when you cut and paste.


1. Prove it....everything I've read says otherwise. I'm talking respected sources here....don't feed me any LaRouchian blather.

Cut and paste? Yeah I cut and pasted a couple of sentences in the above, the ones about Standard Oil to be exact, but the rest of my post was all mine baby......sorry to disappoint you.

But you DID cut an paste. I use " " when I cut and paste. Then it isn't plagiary.