boxleitnerb
Platinum Member
- Nov 1, 2011
- 2,605
- 6
- 81
Obvious fake. Look at the 7970 BF3 score. The Watermark is behind the bar.
Not on my monitor. I don't see it![]()
Not on my monitor. I don't see it![]()
Look at how the vertical blue line is above the watermark.
On second thought, maybe this isn't supposed to be an official slide and is supposed to be results they got for themselves? In either case the watermark underneath the bar graph is odd.
Now, can someone please explain to me how a GPU can 'overclock' the monitor? A 60Hz screen is only going to refresh 60 times per second, unless the actual monitor PCB is overclocked via an EDID override. On the face of it, this sounds like marketing BS, but nonetheless, I'm curious
Monitors receive the display clock from the graphics card. If the chip inside the monitor can work at higher refresh rate then it probably will be fine. Seems like the graphics card can ignore the EDID data from the monitor and send whatever clock signaling it feels like.
I think he's hoping it's fake (not such a turd for the price).
The graph doesn't look off from expectations. Relative to a 7970GE:
47% faster in Crysis 2
35% faster in BF3
43% faster in FC3
23% faster in Hitman
How is that at turd? Of those 4 games, 2 are AMD sponsored, and Titan still manages to average 37% faster than the hd7970GE.
The graph doesn't look off from expectations. Relative to a 7970GE:
47% faster in Crysis 2
35% faster in BF3
43% faster in FC3
23% faster in Hitman
How is that at turd? Of those 4 games, 2 are AMD sponsored, and Titan still manages to average 37% faster than the hd7970GE.
The graph doesn't look off from expectations. Relative to a 7970GE:
47% faster in Crysis 2
35% faster in BF3
43% faster in FC3
23% faster in Hitman
How is that at turd? Of those 4 games, 2 are AMD sponsored, and Titan still manages to average 37% faster than the HD7970Ghz, and only asks for more than double the price!
The graph doesn't look off from expectations. Relative to a 7970GE:
47% faster in Crysis 2
35% faster in BF3
43% faster in FC3
23% faster in Hitman
How is that at turd? Of those 4 games, 2 are AMD sponsored, and Titan still manages to average 37% faster than the hd7970GE.
Raise the 7970's OC to around 1100 and Titan looks like an even bigger failure.
Also, I'm speculating, but I'm calling AMD releasing their memory management drivers to spoil the release of titan. 10% increase across the board. Would be epic.
Raise the 7970's OC to around 1100 and Titan looks like an even bigger failure.
Also, I'm speculating, but I'm calling AMD releasing their memory management drivers to spoil the release of titan. 10% increase across the board. Would be epic.
Raise the 7970's OC to around 1100 and Titan looks like an even bigger failure.
Also, I'm speculating, but I'm calling AMD releasing their memory management drivers to spoil the release of titan. 10% increase across the board. Would be epic.
Yeah, because nobody will overclock TITAN...
Oh now i get it: nVidia users don't overclock, so that is the reason why we only compare stock nVidia cards to overclocked AMD cards :hmm:
Wonder if AMD will pull off a gtx 460 super oc like Nvidia did? The day of release AMD releases a limited edition 1200mhz 7970 to review against the titan.
Primarily due to lack of memory bandwidth. Titan should scale much better while overclocked with the breathing room of the 384 bit busTo be fair overclocking a GTX 680 doesn't yield much at all but I am hoping Titan will be different.
Oh ok sure, but regardless of what the graphics card is sending, most regular 60Hz monitors cannot display 80Hz simply because the graphics card says so. Some can report a higher refresh rate without actually displaying it as increased smoothness (e.g. the fake 125Hz Catleap Multis) but AFAIK the only way to get a monitor to display a higher refresh rate than its spec'd refresh rate is to overclock the PCB...something that is currently only possible on 1-2 niche/enthusiast monitors out there
Edit: I look forward to hearing more details about this feature once the NDA lifts in full!
Zevvo said:Finally! Not voltage locked! Time to blow up some VRAMS!
Primarily due to lack of memory bandwidth. Titan should scale much better while overclocked with the breathing room of the 384 bit bus
