railven
Diamond Member
- Mar 25, 2010
- 6,604
- 561
- 126
That said, I agree that this card should be priced at $800 to differentiate it from the 690.
Irony, look it up, you is now one of them hater's you kept complaining about.
That said, I agree that this card should be priced at $800 to differentiate it from the 690.
Okay then.It's pathetic to ignore the price!
Okay then.
I'll let ya'll spend the next 100pages of this thread arguing over the price rather than having any meaningful discussion. Just like every other nVidia launch thread on Anandtech.

![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
... Disgusting not to mention when did the 680 start getting 70ish fps in skyrim at 2560 4x msaa ?
![]()
Allow the market to decide and choice, premium choice is always welcomed!
More power to ya if you desire to strongly defend premiums though!
Really? I mean REALLY? We don't know what scenes were benched in all those games that don't have integrated benchmarks (and even with those we don't know if TPU or Nvidia used them). To compare numbers across different reviews never worked.
Okay then.
I'll let ya'll spend the next 100pages of this thread arguing over the price rather than having any meaningful discussion. Just like every other nVidia launch thread on Anandtech.
Really? I mean REALLY? We don't know what scenes were benched in all those games that don't have integrated benchmarks (and even with those we don't know if TPU or Nvidia used them). To compare numbers across different reviews never worked.
Really? I mean REALLY? We don't know what scenes were benched in all those games that don't have integrated benchmarks (and even with those we don't know if TPU or Nvidia used them). To compare numbers across different reviews never worked.
What percentage of people posting in this thread do you suppose will actually be getting at least one of these cards?
Anyone know how I can connect a 3rd GTX 690 so that I can enable 6-Way SLI?
![]()
Irony, look it up, you is now one of them hater's you kept complaining about.![]()
You mean all the benches made with the 304.79 Beta driver on a different hardware setup?
Really? I mean REALLY?![]()
What the heck are you talking about? I mean we don't know what was benched. For instance in Skyrim fps can range from lets say 50 to 150 depending on the scene. Indoor, outdoor, forest, plains, battle scene with spell effects, just looking around etc. Same goes for basically every game, the variance is very very large.
I'm not sure if Titan will be successful or not but It is the most talked about card in ATF's history, well that's something at least![]()
Internal benchs for Nvidia in 2560X1600 AAx4.
![]()
http://www.geforce.com/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gtx-titan/performance
This chart must have been mistakenly put up on the website (as performance data is not supposed to be shown until Thur Feb 21), and is now removed.
Here is the approximate performance increase for Geforce Titan vs. GTX 680 based on the chart above (2560x1600, 4xMSAA, 16xAF, Maximum Game Settings):
Metro 2033: +65%
Crysis 3: +44%
The Witcher 2: +33%
Max Payne 3: +44%
Crysis 2: +52%
Shogun 2: +46%
Assassin's Creed III: +38%
Borderlands 2: +33%
Lost Planet 2: +31%
Sleeping Dogs: +49%
Battlefield 3: +46%
Deus Ex: Human Revolution: +52%
Dirt 3: +42%
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim: +44%
Call of Duty: Blacks Ops II: +41%
Batman: Arkham City: +36%
StarCraft II: +58%
Average performance increase: +44%
Not unless AMD comes out with a Radeon Zeus! You know, the Titan slayer
Actually, at this point I'd be happy just to see a successor to the HD 7k series out of them haha.
