Status
Not open for further replies.

Sweepr

Diamond Member
May 12, 2006
5,148
1,142
131
- New GP107 GPU
Successor to GM107 (GTX 750/750 Ti)
- 128-bit GDDR5 / 2GB or 4GB
- Replaces the GTX 950, price on the same level
- Agressive pricing
- Shipments late September, launch mid-October


More here: www.sweclockers.com/nyhet/22509-nvidia-lanserar-geforce-gtx-1050-i-oktober


September 4th Update: Specs Out

https://benchlife.info/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1050-4gb-gp107-400-09042016/

60% the number of CUDA cores of GP106.


September 25th Update: Two cards, previously leaked 1050 is actually 1050 Ti

Full Geforce GTX 1050 / 1050 Ti specs, courtesy of BenchLife:

full%201050%20specs_zpsmgg9gofc.jpg


1050 Ti (GP107-400) = 2.12 Tflops
1050 (GP107-300) = 1.86 Tflops

1050 = cut down GP107 with 2GB RAM, late October launch, $119
1050 Ti = full GP107 with 4GB RAM, mid October launch, $149

http://www.hwbattle.com/bbs/board.php?bo_table=news&wr_id=50728


October 1st Update: First Benchmarks and Board/Die Pictures (GTX 1050 Ti)

Colorful Geforce GTX 1050 Ti:

221819lzjc7ulnzuuvvcuu_zpsfj5moh3k.jpg


215047k6nzbjzzisixinxn_zpslssyqgmf.png


220615qyw8rg528fg4uy6n_zps9wbbi20n.jpg


It's basically at stock (only 9 MHz above BenchLife's leaked turbo clock). Looks very promising.

Here's older cards in comparison:

http://www.guru3d.com/index.php?ct=...dmin=0a8fcaad6b03da6a6895d1ada2e171002a287bc1

http://www.guru3d.com/index.php?ct=...dmin=0a8fcaad6b03da6a6895d1ada2e171002a287bc1

$149 XFX RX 460 Double Dissipation - 8597 pts


GP107 Die + 1050 Ti 4GB Board

3333_zpsw1uemc7u.png


2222_zpsg0vq26f3.png


1111_zpsl4xuzwp8.png



October 9th Update: Geforce GTX 1050 Ti (Reference) - Ahead of GTX 960 in New Benchmarks

New round of Geforce GTX 1050 Ti leaks:

- Reference card is ~21 cm and doesn't require an extra 6-pin power connector
- Custom cards will include 6-pin
- Specifications: GP107-400, 768 SPs, 64 TMUs, 32 ROPs, base frequency 1354 MHz, turbo frequency 1468 MHz, 128-bit 4 GB GDDR5
- Frequencies range from 1354 MHz all the way to 1797 MHz
- Launch between October 18-25th

Die
3e82447bc45a414ab450a585e1c9efe8_zpsh0clftvz.jpg


BIOS
cab16bc857774602a201edc4fadd4daf_zps4oyd2tnf.jpg


GPU-Z
b6a85cb5046e441d9d3295b164a7097b_zpszoxg1x1f.jpg


Geforce GTX 1050 Ti (Reference) - Back
e39f30481c684d81b4cae3dbbf873d46_zpsupauoax1.jpg


Clocks
ab5cfb0ed27f47febac712871686179b_zpsxxntwq49.jpg


And the most interesting part, benchmarks.

- 3DMark Fire Strike Ultra (4K)
fa1384e98c1a443c8146e8a5c7f06d1e_zpsjhkggz9n.jpg


Scores from existing cards
7823_71_sapphire-nitro-radeon-rx-460-oc-4gb-review.png


- 3DMark Time Spy
caebb63908a4471b9c9124834d7103e9_zpsnpqqyl1t.jpg


Leaker didn't mention if Async is On or Off, but here's scores from existing cards with Async On
Gigabyte-Radeon-RX-460-Performance-Review_3DMark-Time-Spy.png
 
Last edited:

daxzy

Senior member
Dec 22, 2013
393
77
101
Pricing is definitely a concern. The GTX 950 launched @ $160, slightly more for the 4GB version.

I'm still waiting for RX-460 4GB prices to come down.
 

Erithan13

Senior member
Oct 25, 2015
218
79
66
If it's pinless this will go in our media PC for sure.

I think it's pretty much guaranteed to be pinless, although there might be AIB versions with a 6 pin to allow a higher power/performance limit.

Last rumors I heard put this for December, guess the RX 460 launch has brought it forward?
 

tviceman

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2008
6,734
514
126
www.facebook.com
The more than likely specs: 5 SM's (half of GP106), with 32 ROPs (1/3 less than GP106), no PCIe connector.

Since the bus width isn't cut in half and GP106 already has a higher bandwidth / throughput ratio than GP104, the vram will likely run somewhere between 6 and 7ghz (slower than the 8ghz GP106 has). At 6ghz, it'll be exactly half the bandwidth of GP106, so I'm speculating / guessing it'll be 6-6.6ghz to save a small amount inTDP, and putting that savings towards clocking the chip higher. In the end, I think it'll end up between 55-60% the speed of GTX 1060, making it about 5-10% faster than the GTX 960, and 20-25% faster than RX 460. I'm going with $159 for the 4gb version, and $129 for the 2gb version.
 

SPBHM

Diamond Member
Sep 12, 2012
5,056
409
126
I'm hope it's closer to the 460 than 470 in terms of price,
this card is probably going to be a winner, considering the power efficiency of all the Pascal cards
 

jpiniero

Lifer
Oct 1, 2010
14,583
5,204
136
That would kind of suck if it did only have 640 cores. The 950 has 768, even if it is a 06 card.
 

SPBHM

Diamond Member
Sep 12, 2012
5,056
409
126
That would kind of suck if it did only have 640 cores. The 950 has 768, even if it is a 06 card.

I suppose, but with a Pascal clock it would easily beat the 950, while using a lot less power.
but looking at the rest of the line, 1060, 1070 and 1080 all had more SPs than the last gen + high clocks, but at the same time the 750 was not replaced and continued to be sold during the Maxwell 2 days, so if this 1050 is aiming more at replacing the 750 than the 950, it could have the same or less.
 

Blue_Max

Diamond Member
Jul 7, 2011
4,227
153
106
Hey, I'm just hoping they make a low-profile version right out of the gates. Heck, they'd be smart to engineer it as such and ship with standard + LP brackets in the box like so many cards already do.
(Ex: GT-740)
prev_PNY-Graphics-Cards-GeForce-GT-740-1GB-gr.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: nathanddrews

CFP

Senior member
Apr 26, 2006
544
6
81
Can anybody speculate as to how this may translate to a laptop part?

Since it's probably unlikely we'll get the 1060 in ultrabooks (I'm guessing 14"+ like the razor blade), then this 1050 could be a discrete gpu in a 12~13 slim ultrabook, which is very attractive for light gaming on the go. At half the performance of a 1060, you're still looking at viable gaming on medium details at 1080p.

Great for when you're in that hotel for a few day and want to play something, but didn't want to take your thick and heavy 15-incher.
 

mohit9206

Golden Member
Jul 2, 2013
1,381
511
136
The more than likely specs: 5 SM's (half of GP106), with 32 ROPs (1/3 less than GP106), no PCIe connector.

Since the bus width isn't cut in half and GP106 already has a higher bandwidth / throughput ratio than GP104, the vram will likely run somewhere between 6 and 7ghz (slower than the 8ghz GP106 has). At 6ghz, it'll be exactly half the bandwidth of GP106, so I'm speculating / guessing it'll be 6-6.6ghz to save a small amount inTDP, and putting that savings towards clocking the chip higher. In the end, I think it'll end up between 55-60% the speed of GTX 1060, making it about 5-10% faster than the GTX 960, and 20-25% faster than RX 460. I'm going with $159 for the 4gb version, and $129 for the 2gb version.
That's some great prediction ,i agree with you.Nvidia could market it as "Faster than GTX 960" and sell a crap ton of these cards.
The only part where you're way off the mark is the price prediction. Let's be more realistic.Am going with $150-160 for 2GB and $170-180 for 4GB.
 

nvgpu

Senior member
Sep 12, 2014
629
202
81
The most important thing is that Pascal GPUs have Feature Set H hardware decoder which supports 8K HEVC Main10/Main12(not sure if Main12 is working, need a future driver release probably or need a newer DXVA Checker that supports Main12 querying properly) hardware decoding & VP9 hardware decoding, GP107 will replace GM107 as the HTPC card of choice for many people because it doesn't need external PCIe power connector, making upgrades easy.

vsV8VZv.jpg
 
Last edited:

R0H1T

Platinum Member
Jan 12, 2013
2,582
162
106
That's some great prediction ,i agree with you.Nvidia could market it as "Faster than GTX 960" and sell a crap ton of these cards.
The only part where you're way off the mark is the price prediction. Let's be more realistic.Am going with $150-160 for 2GB and $170-180 for 4GB.
That's close to where I'd say it'll fall, provided there's no 1050Ti :cool:
 

dark zero

Platinum Member
Jun 2, 2015
2,655
138
106
Still.... The 460 is unmatched due prices.
They must prepare the OC passive GT1040 if they want to compete.
 

tviceman

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2008
6,734
514
126
www.facebook.com
That's some great prediction ,i agree with you.Nvidia could market it as "Faster than GTX 960" and sell a crap ton of these cards.
The only part where you're way off the mark is the price prediction. Let's be more realistic.Am going with $150-160 for 2GB and $170-180 for 4GB.

They won't price it $20-30 less than the GTX 1050 3gb for 40% less performance. $160 is 20% cheaper and $20 more than the RX 460. That is what I think it'll be priced at.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,414
8,356
126
is this the part that's going to replace the 750 ert, "960m" in mainstream "gaming" laptops?
 
  • Like
Reactions: dark zero

dark zero

Platinum Member
Jun 2, 2015
2,655
138
106
is this the part that's going to replace the 750 ert, "960m" in mainstream "gaming" laptops?
Nope.. is replacing 950. We need to wait if nVIDIA launchs a GT 1040 in order to see a competitor against the comparable opponent. And also the 1040 could replace the GTX 750Ti
 

mohit9206

Golden Member
Jul 2, 2013
1,381
511
136
This will most definitely be my next card,the 4GB model ofcourse.Faster than RX460 and only a little more expensive.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.