tweakboy
Diamond Member
They made a difference for me. Now every game runs flawless on all these games. 60fps 1080p 8x CSAA FXAA high quality 16xAF vsync on I get 60fps avg. drops to 50's thats it....... then comes back up. gl coupdeloop
I have been hoping for a long time that physics would get more involved in gameplay and not just some glorified bling.
Imho,
Indeed on game-play! However, personally don't see a dramatic or substantial shit in improvements with game-play based on this may systematically lock a title to one vendor - hence, why many of the effects are improvements, subjectively with fidelity.
This may take a complete effort by the industry itself on dramatic shits on game-play but how does one start the ball rolling? Begin? In a competitive landscape? Where these resources may be cost immense?
Your post is a case where spellcheck wouldn't help, but a read through might...
The 690 is still the fastest video card. So they have the performance lead. They have the sales lead.You're trying really hard to play damage control. Try again when Nvidia is back in the lead :thumbsup:
The 690 is still the fastest video card. So they have the performance lead. They have the sales lead.
The HIS 7970 X2 is the fastest video card, you must of missed the review.
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2279060
Yes. It's a feature of Radeonpro calling DFC.The software adaptive vsync for crossfire was pretty impressive. Too bad the translation was so bad that I couldn't really understand what was being said about it. The graphs looked good though. I believe it was part of Radeon Pro? I would imagine something similar could be easily adapted to Nvidia GPU's which looks like it would be great news for dual card users for both brands.
I'm very sensitive to framerates and that's the main reason why I have never tried SLi/Xfire because I'm almost positive I would see the micro stutter.
- New: Dynamic Framerate Control (DFC) support. This feature acts like a frame rate limiter with smoothness control, just set a frame rate target and RadeonPro will try to keep it as close as possible while maintaining frame rendering times close to each other to avoid stuttering.
Nvidia GPU's are attractive enough without them having to lower prices. A driver update or two down the road and things will be back where they were, however small a difference that might be. And you know who else thinks 1 or 2 PHysX titles per year are ridiculous? Just ask all those using Hybrid PhysX right now. They think it's worthless too. But they are second guessing their decisions because by using two cards, defeats the power consumption arguments they used previously. Better off just using one card to do it all and only use a second card if you really need it.
By the way, Borderlands 2 ALONE is worth the price of PhsyX admission. But it isn't alone.
The HIS 7970 X2 is the fastest video card, you must of missed the review.
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2279060
Its fineSo how's performance in Borderlands 2 with High Phsyx on a single card? Just curious.
So how's performance in Borderlands 2 with High Phsyx on a single card? Just curious.
HIS 7970 X2 is not from AMD is it?going by your logic 6990 was not the fastest either it was Asus Mars 590.
You didn't answer my question fine.Also the test set was abysmal at best.
Going by your point until recently 680 lightning was the fastest card available.But everybody said 7970Ghz ed was the fastest funny.
Exactly the "context".So depending on games 690 can still be considered the fastest and the "ms" issue is much bearable compared to "amd" alternatives.It depends on the specifics of the question and the context.The fastest card available between the 2 brands is the fastest card available, custom or not.
Exactly the "context".So depending on games 690 can still be considered the fastest
The HIS 7970 X2 is the fastest video card, you must of missed the review.
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2279060
The software adaptive vsync for crossfire was pretty impressive. Too bad the translation was so bad that I couldn't really understand what was being said about it. The graphs looked good though. I believe it was part of Radeon Pro? I would imagine something similar could be easily adapted to Nvidia GPU's which looks like it would be great news for dual card users for both brands.
I'm very sensitive to framerates and that's the main reason why I have never tried SLi/Xfire because I'm almost positive I would see the micro stutter.
Could not find this card on Newegg.
I just bought four;
Overclockers was taking too long deciding whether to maybe possibly make some watercooled 7990s with HIS, so we just got some custom copper/nickel heatsinks made up for the Powercolors. Currently testing with the original air coolers, will be mounting the waterblocks for 8-GPU overclocked testing next week;
Host machine has dual overclocked 8-core Xeons, 128 GB DDR3-1600, quad SSDs (Kingston MAX-IOPS in RAID0), 3 x 4 TB HDDs in RAID5 for bulk storage, dual 10 Gigabit ethernet, touch-screen system management panel on the front, dual 1200W PSUs, dual pumps, quad triple-fan rads etc.
Initial testing has confirmed that AMD has finally fixed the 'can't disable Crossfire on dual-GPU cards' bug that rendered the 5970 and 6990 paperweights for OpenCL purposes. Currently seeing 90%+ scaling on OpenCL apps over two GPUs, will be getting 8-way scaling numbers next week.