Question Geekbench 6 released and calibrated against Core i7-12700

Page 33 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
I

igor_kavinski

Lifer
Jul 27, 2020
28,033
19,131
146
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Gideon, Kaluan and Saylick
D

Doug S

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2020
3,576
6,312
136
igor_kavinski said:
Need to be logged in for that to show: https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/10179944.gb6

Append ".gb6" to any GB6 result.

View attachment 115871

Sadly, still doesn't show which subtest is using which ISA extension(s).
Click to expand...

Ugh. That's dumb. Why should we have to login to see this info? Hopefully John will decide to make it available by default on the main results screen, or at least have a link to it that doesn't require knowing the magic suffix to the URL and logging in!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97 and igor_kavinski
M

MS_AT

Senior member
Jul 15, 2024
869
1,763
96
igor_kavinski said:
Maybe Intel engineers submitted optimization patches to the Clang codebase?
Click to expand...
I hope they do. After all since they base their compiler on Clang, the decent thing is contribute back. Something that AMD has yet to understand... But at least Geekbench 6.1 was compiled using Clang 16 on all platforms. I haven't seen any publicly available info about later versions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97 and igor_kavinski
Eug

Eug

Lifer
Mar 11, 2000
24,125
1,768
126
Det0x said:
Seems like no difference in score between 6.3 and 6.4 for the 9950X
Click to expand...
I don’t think there is much difference between 6.4 vs 6.3 on Apple M4 either, although I didn’t bother checking all the subtests to confirm.
 
I

igor_kavinski

Lifer
Jul 27, 2020
28,033
19,131
146
Det0x said:
Seems like no difference in score between 6.3 and 6.4 for the 9950X
Click to expand...
Yeah. No difference at all! So far only Ice Lake Xeon difference confirmed. I wonder if it has something to do with Geekbench 6.4 using OS specific performance enhancement of Windows Server 2019.
 
Gideon

Gideon

Platinum Member
Nov 27, 2007
2,030
5,035
136
poke01 said:
well its here now
View attachment 116131
Click to expand...
An improvement for sure. I wish they'd just add the the most relevant instructions as badges under each subtest, as mentioned above.

Did a quick and dirty 10-minute mock-up. IMO the data should be presented more-or-less like this:

(note: this is not real geekbench, but my 10 minute mockup. but hey it's open source, so hopefully primate labs will do something similar)

1738919463800.png

System info overview:

1738919325886.png


Code and online sandbox available here:
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: okoroezenwa, igor_kavinski, poke01 and 2 others
I

igor_kavinski

Lifer
Jul 27, 2020
28,033
19,131
146
Gideon said:
Code and online sandbox available here:
Click to expand...
You are DA MAN!

I think a better way would be to create a browser extension or maybe a quick and dirty Electron app that takes a GB URL and presents the information in your proposed way.

Primate Labs don't want to do anything. Their forums are proof of that. Tons of requests from their users and they just sit on their asses, enjoying their pot of gold.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gideon
O

okoroezenwa

Member
Dec 22, 2020
165
157
116
Gideon said:
An improvement for sure. I wish they'd just add the the most relevant instructions as badges under each subtest, as mentioned above.

Did a quick and dirty 10-minute mock-up. IMO the data should be presented more-or-less like this:

(note: this is not real geekbench, but my 10 minute mockup. but hey it's open source, so hopefully primate labs will do something similar)

View attachment 116498

System info overview:

View attachment 116497


Code and online sandbox available here:
Click to expand...
This is fantastic. Need primate labs to adopt this with haste.
 
  • Like
Reactions: igor_kavinski
L

LightningZ71

Platinum Member
Mar 10, 2017
2,508
3,191
136
I wonder if the 9900x3d and 9950x3d are better able to handle the latency hit of going to higher RAM speeds than the other SKUs. The single CCD processors can't use the extra bandwidth and the non 3d dual SKUs seem to not like the increased latency. Maybe the 9950x3d can finally figure it out?
 
  • Like
Reactions: igor_kavinski
Sgraffite

Sgraffite

Senior member
Jul 4, 2001
204
144
116
poke01 said:
Is this a laptop or a mini-pc?
Click to expand...
It's a mini PC, specifically the Acemagic F3A I got as barebones. It takes SODIMMs so the memory is not as fast as soldered, but the Crucial 96GB kit was under $200. It can also use the 128GB Crucial kit, but that costs like 50% more than 96GB.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: poke01 and igor_kavinski
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom