Originally posted by: TheAudit
In the SSE version of the Star Wars Trilogy, Darth Vader changes his name to Turd Ferguson, Paris Hilton is digitally edited into the movies to replace Carrie Fisher as Leia, R2D2 no longer beeps but has a voiceover with a lot more street cred (?C3PO, you just got served, biatch.?) and Han Solo is now a woman warrior with a lot of heart played by Angelina Jolie.
Originally posted by: DougK62
I think I'm probably the only one that thinks it's kinda cool that he likes the movies so much to go back and "better" them.
I still like the originals best.
Originally posted by: Vic
Anyone seen the recent "Making of..." Star Wars bit on (IIRC) A&E? Even Lucas admitted that he has slipped to the Dark Side (in his opinion, corporatism).
The changes that Lucas has made are not "minor". The entire moral story has been changed (Star Wars is, or was, a morality play). Not just with the SE changes but with the developments added in Ep's 1 and 2. Han is no longer running for his life and desperately in need of money to pay off Jabba. The Force is something one is born with, not a discipline that can be learned by faithful. Stormtroopers are zombie clones. Annakin's fall to the Dark Side to become Darth Vader is no longer a mighty fall from grace, but like tripping off a low curb (and thus his redemption in ROTJ has much less meaning). I could go on.
Lucas himself said that (in his early film career) the Dark Side of the force represented all that is evil and corporate in the film industry. Now he is exactly that.
Originally posted by: Vic
Anyone seen the recent "Making of..." Star Wars bit on (IIRC) A&E? Even Lucas admitted that he has slipped to the Dark Side (in his opinion, corporatism).
The changes that Lucas has made are not "minor". The entire moral story has been changed (Star Wars is, or was, a morality play). Not just with the SE changes but with the developments added in Ep's 1 and 2. Han is no longer running for his life and desperately in need of money to pay off Jabba. The Force is something one is born with, not a discipline that can be learned by faithful. Stormtroopers are zombie clones. Annakin's fall to the Dark Side to become Darth Vader is no longer a mighty fall from grace, but like tripping off a low curb (and thus his redemption in ROTJ has much less meaning). I could go on.
Lucas himself said that (in his early film career) the Dark Side of the force represented all that is evil and corporate in the film industry. Now he is exactly that.
Originally posted by: MartyMcFly3
The only change I think is bad is adding Hayden Christensen in with the "Force Ghosts"...
Originally posted by: CVSiN
anyone that has followed Star Wars and the cannon as well as the movies knew this long before ep 1 and 2...
Originally posted by: FrankyJunior
Originally posted by: MartyMcFly3
The only change I think is bad is adding Hayden Christensen in with the "Force Ghosts"...
Same here. That one just doesn't fit.
Plus he's a really bad actor.
Originally posted by: pulse8
Originally posted by: DougK62
I think I'm probably the only one that thinks it's kinda cool that he likes the movies so much to go back and "better" them.
I still like the originals best.
He's just so insecure in his filmmaking that he has to go back, "better" them and destroy the originals so that eventually no one will know anything else but the updated versions.
You don't see a lot of the other great directors to come out of that time going back to make their films "better."
Originally posted by: torpid
Originally posted by: pulse8
Originally posted by: DougK62
I think I'm probably the only one that thinks it's kinda cool that he likes the movies so much to go back and "better" them.
I still like the originals best.
He's just so insecure in his filmmaking that he has to go back, "better" them and destroy the originals so that eventually no one will know anything else but the updated versions.
You don't see a lot of the other great directors to come out of that time going back to make their films "better."
Yeah you do. The exorcist was re-released. So was apocalypse now. Worse, those movies didn't even really need it, because they didn't seem too dated compared to SW.
Originally posted by: torpid
Originally posted by: pulse8
Originally posted by: DougK62
I think I'm probably the only one that thinks it's kinda cool that he likes the movies so much to go back and "better" them.
I still like the originals best.
He's just so insecure in his filmmaking that he has to go back, "better" them and destroy the originals so that eventually no one will know anything else but the updated versions.
You don't see a lot of the other great directors to come out of that time going back to make their films "better."
Yeah you do. The exorcist was re-released. So was apocalypse now. Worse, those movies didn't even really need it, because they didn't seem too dated compared to SW.
And you can still buy the originals if you so choose.Originally posted by: Strang
But those are directors' cuts with original footage re-added, not CGI-edited footage.Originally posted by: torpid
Yeah you do. The exorcist was re-released. So was apocalypse now. Worse, those movies didn't even really need it, because they didn't seem too dated compared to SW.Originally posted by: pulse8
He's just so insecure in his filmmaking that he has to go back, "better" them and destroy the originals so that eventually no one will know anything else but the updated versions.Originally posted by: DougK62
I think I'm probably the only one that thinks it's kinda cool that he likes the movies so much to go back and "better" them.
I still like the originals best.
You don't see a lot of the other great directors to come out of that time going back to make their films "better."
Originally posted by: blazert40
These small changes don't bug me, if I were George though I'd offer the original version and the "enhanced" version in an effort to make more money if anything else.
BTW Hayden Christensen sucks ass at acting and is one of the biggest failings of all the movies. They need to get a completely new actor and digital redo the last two with Hayden Christensen removed. How could they go so far as to make two movies and not realize how badly he sucks at acting?
Originally posted by: Vic
Anyone seen the recent "Making of..." Star Wars bit on (IIRC) A&E? Even Lucas admitted that he has slipped to the Dark Side (in his opinion, corporatism).
The changes that Lucas has made are not "minor". The entire moral story has been changed (Star Wars is, or was, a morality play). Not just with the SE changes but with the developments added in Ep's 1 and 2. Han is no longer running for his life and desperately in need of money to pay off Jabba. The Force is something one is born with, not a discipline that can be learned by faithful. Stormtroopers are zombie clones. Annakin's fall to the Dark Side to become Darth Vader is no longer a mighty fall from grace, but like tripping off a low curb (and thus his redemption in ROTJ has much less meaning). I could go on.
Lucas himself said that (in his early film career) the Dark Side of the force represented all that is evil and corporate in the film industry. Now he is exactly that.
Originally posted by: SaltBoy
Hayden Christensen does NOT suck as an actor. Anybody who's seen Life as a House and/or Shattered Glass would know he's an EXCELLENT actor.
Lucas just doesn't know how to direct people - plain and simple.
Originally posted by: Strang
Originally posted by: blazert40
These small changes don't bug me, if I were George though I'd offer the original version and the "enhanced" version in an effort to make more money if anything else.
BTW Hayden Christensen sucks ass at acting and is one of the biggest failings of all the movies. They need to get a completely new actor and digital redo the last two with Hayden Christensen removed. How could they go so far as to make two movies and not realize how badly he sucks at acting?
Well, to be fair, Christensen wasn't in the first movie -- Jake Lloyd was the awful actor playing Anakin in that one. If you want to give Lucas the benefit of the doubt, you could argue that he hired Christensen to maintain a consistency in the crappiness of the acting.
Also all of the actors sucked in the prequels (with the exception of Ewan MacGregor).
Originally posted by: SaltBoy
Hayden Christensen does NOT suck as an actor. Anybody who's seen Life as a House and/or Shattered Glass would know he's an EXCELLENT actor.
Lucas just doesn't know how to direct people - plain and simple.
Originally posted by: Yossarian
Originally posted by: SaltBoy
Hayden Christensen does NOT suck as an actor. Anybody who's seen Life as a House and/or Shattered Glass would know he's an EXCELLENT actor.
Lucas just doesn't know how to direct people - plain and simple.
I thought he was terrible in Life as a House, but whatever.