Lol wow, you've got me all figured out don't you?
Because obviously the first thing I'd do in trying to cover up lack of knowledge
is admit my lack knowledge. You're a riot!
I was giving you an opportunity to present the details of an issue I was unaware of. You failed to provide said details, merely more vitriol and assumptions. So I didn't respond. That's the truth, but you don't like that, so play out whatever fantasies you have about me to your heart's content.
And do you even know what a logical argument is? Do you know how to consider multiple sides of an issue? Do you have the ability to form alternate theories and question yourself? Because if you did you'd realize that if it was accidental as the Israelis claim, then the UN could have told them the location 1700 times and it wouldn't have made any difference. Collateral damage happens in war. Missiles and shells miss their targets more times than you'd probably believe, even in the most modern militaries.
Also learn what a reliable source is. You're lucky I cared enough to click the sub-links in that article and found the original UN article, which you should have provided in place of excerpts on a no-name blog post (not an authoritative source). But then again the original, un-creatively-edited article doesn't support your argument as well as those out of context quotes.
Also, that post and this article are from 2009, but it still proves my point.
http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=29472&Cr=Palestin&Cr1=
This part is called "analysis" and it shows that if the Israelis are intentionally targeting UN buildings, they really suck at it. 15,000 Palestinians in 2 dozen shelters, and less than 100 dead and wounded and 3 shelters hit out of 2 dozen, one of which was empty. In addition specifics of the warhead impacts show they were almost certainly collateral damage, as no building was directly hit.
So your argument falls flat on its face with your own sources. Perhaps you should read and analyze them before assuming they support your argument.
In any case, my sister wrote her Masters Thesis on Muslim issues in the Middle East, she hates what's happening in Gaza and I've seen her literally brought to tears over this issue. She knows people from the region and hates what the Israelis are doing. She knows more and cares more about this issue than either of us, and even
she stops short of accusing the Israelis of the kind of bullshit you're spewing here.
But we both know this won't change anything, because you're so weak I don't think you're capable of admitting that you're wrong, even in a zero-consequence environment like an internet forum. Given how poorly you control your emotions in your posts I think it's pretty safe to say such an admission would be too much for you. And don't try to throw this back on me, because I can pull up posts on this very forum where I've baldfaced admitted that I was wrong and changed my opinion. I sincerely doubt you can do the same.
Facebook
Twitter