• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

gay marriage question

would you issue or deny a marriage permit to this couple?

  • yes

  • no

Results are only viewable after voting.
glenn1

glenn1

Lifer
An honest question, primarily for those who oppose gay marriage, but also open for supporters who want to give a thoughtful answer that honors the terms of the question.

Situation: You are in a state where gay marriage is not currently legal. A couple is looking to be married where one of the persons either has undergone sex reassignment therapy, or intends to shortly. Would you grant or deny the marriage license, and what would your rationale be?


Follow up question: Would your answer change depending on whether the partners were of the same or opposite sex before the surgery.

Note: having difficulty updating poll, vote YES if you would issue marriage license.
 
Last edited:
Your poll is confusing, "Would you do A or B" "answer1: Yes, Answer2: No"

Aside from that, I'd give them a marriage licence, but I'm pro-gay marriage so my answer is probably not what you are looking for.
 
HAL9000 said:
Your poll is confusing, "Would you do A or B" "answer1: Yes, Answer2: No"

Aside from that, I'd give them a marriage licence, but I'm pro-gay marriage so my answer is probably not what you are looking for.
Click to expand...

Point taken. I'm having difficulties updating poll, so vote YES if you would issue marriage license, NO if you would deny.
 
Sure would, but I don't have an issue with gay marriage. I really fail to see why people have a problem with gay marriage.
 
A person doesn't issue a marriage license in their own authority, they are acting for the State. Their power to so act is specifically set forth by the applicable statutes. The answer to your question is that the person MUST do what the applicable statutes say, regardless of their personal beliefs. If their beliefs so conflict with the responsibilities of their office that they feel they cannot perform the obligations of that office, then they must resign.

The only real exception is where the officeholder feels the statutes are unconstitutional and/or are illegal under a superior civil law. Then he or she may take whatever steps are necessary to have that constitutionality/legality tested in the courts.
 
Thump553 said:
A person doesn't issue a marriage license in their own authority, they are acting for the State. Their power to so act is specifically set forth by the applicable statutes. The answer to your question is that the person MUST do what the applicable statutes say, regardless of their personal beliefs. If their beliefs so conflict with the responsibilities of their office that they feel they cannot perform the obligations of that office, then they must resign.

The only real exception is where the officeholder feels the statutes are unconstitutional and/or are illegal under a superior civil law. Then he or she may take whatever steps are necessary to have that constitutionality/legality tested in the courts.
Click to expand...

I think he's talking hypothetically. I.e. if you had the capacity to choose, then how would you act.
 
If they are still legally both sexes at the time, then there's no choice but to say yes. I suppose it's even difficult to decide afterwards, except if the law recognizes a sex change and then the marriage is no longer possible or valid?

:hmm: Quite a problem there. Default is yes.
 
A sex change operation isn't really a sex change operation.

A guy does not become female because he chops his penis off. He is still a guy, just one that looks like a female.

So if you live in a state where gay marriage is illegal I would not issue the license.
 
I think all marriage should be a religious institution only with NO LEGAL benefits till everyone can get equal treatment under the law.
 
I think any two consenting adults should be able to marry if they wish. Who am I to say they can't? I'm also in favor of group marriage arrangements, provided there are equitable legal frameworks set up between all parties involved (i.e. inheritance rights, etc.) ..
 
How about this "hypothetical"?

A gay foreign exchange student comes to study in the US on a student visa. While studying here, said student gets married which is legal in their state to a US citizen. However, DOMA prevents the federal government from recognizing their marriage and acts to deports the foreign exchange student after the visa expires.
 
ProfJohn said:
A sex change operation isn't really a sex change operation.

A guy does not become female because he chops his penis off. He is still a guy, just one that looks like a female.

So if you live in a state where gay marriage is illegal I would not issue the license.
Click to expand...

🙄
 
ProfJohn said:
A sex change operation isn't really a sex change operation.

A guy does not become female because he chops his penis off. He is still a guy, just one that looks like a female.

So if you live in a state where gay marriage is illegal I would not issue the license.
Click to expand...

So now the question becomes: what do you define as "male" and what do you define as "female"? Consider a genetic XY individual, who under normal circumstances would be a male. However, this individual has androgen insensitivity syndrome, and therefore lools like a female. How would you resolve this person's marriage to another man or to another woman?
 
ProfJohn said:
A sex change operation isn't really a sex change operation.

A guy does not become female because he chops his penis off. He is still a guy, just one that looks like a female.

So if you live in a state where gay marriage is illegal I would not issue the license.
Click to expand...

A couple things about which you're ignorant:

- Sex reassignment therapy != "chopping the penis off".
- Looks can be incredibly deceiving.
 
Thump553 said:
A person doesn't issue a marriage license in their own authority, they are acting for the State. Their power to so act is specifically set forth by the applicable statutes. The answer to your question is that the person MUST do what the applicable statutes say, regardless of their personal beliefs. If their beliefs so conflict with the responsibilities of their office that they feel they cannot perform the obligations of that office, then they must resign.

The only real exception is where the officeholder feels the statutes are unconstitutional and/or are illegal under a superior civil law. Then he or she may take whatever steps are necessary to have that constitutionality/legality tested in the courts.
Click to expand...
This. My preference is that the state not have the power to control whom we may or may not marry, but someone paid to issue marriage licenses needs to follow the law. As far as interpretation, whatever sex the state recognizes for the individuals at that moment controls their legal status at that moment; their future plans and past status are irrelevant.
 
There is no such thing as "sex reassignment". Peoples genes and chromosomes are not changed. Surgery just renders mutilated people pretending to be changed. Gender Identity Disorder still exists of course (political correctness hopes to fix that) and I see no reason to alter laws and institutions to accommodate disorders. The US is economically bankrupt and in an advanced state of societal decay. Its culture is debased, its borders are virtually collapsed, its population is dividing into tribal antagonisms, its youth indoctrinated into national and personal self hatred. Normal marriage long ago became debased and portrayed as irrelevant ("just a piece of paper!"). Now the same people (libs) want to make marriage important again - but in mutational forms.


Not long ago I read Switzerland was looking to make incest legal and I am sure the libs in US will head the same way. Right now the Obama admin is even recruiting people with GID to adopt kids. So kids are getting sacrificed to disordered people to make them feel happy about themselves. Obama put LGBT activists in charge of children and families just as he put Kevin Jennings (Mr Fisting) in charge of school safety. This kind of thing just accelerates America's decline - which libs like anyway. Poor kids hardly have a chance in US culture these days.



HHS Official Tells Youth Summit: We're Recruiting LGBTs to Adopt Kids


http://cnsnews.com/news/article/hhs-official-teens-gov-t-lgbt-youth-summ
 
ProfJohn said:
Can a man who has therapy have a baby?
Can a women who has therapy be the male father of a baby?
Click to expand...

The ability to bear/father offspring is irrelevant to this discussion, unless you're willing to concede that sterile people should not be able to marry.
 
What kind of question is this?

Would you issuie or deny ..... What is yes and what is no???

Ambiguous Question!

It is the Economy Stupid!

At this point Gay marriage is a stupid question. Who cares. All gay people want is free money and benefits for none of the responsibility of a real marriage.
 
Last edited:
jhu said:
So now the question becomes: what do you define as "male" and what do you define as "female"? Consider a genetic XY individual, who under normal circumstances would be a male. However, this individual has androgen insensitivity syndrome, and therefore lools like a female. How would you resolve this person's marriage to another man or to another woman?
Click to expand...
I'm not sure if it's this syndrome or something else, but in parts of Mexico there are villages where a certain number of genetically male babies never express (or maybe use) male hormones and so grow up into apparent women. They tend to be very attractive and healthy, so this situation is not usually detected until the erstwhile woman proves unable to have normal intercourse because of a short vaginal canal. Typically this is after marriage. These persons self-identify as female, appear quite desirably female, and have been recorded as female from birth where, absent a genetic test, they are undetectable from a genetic female. They are however genetically male, although as females they are reasonably functional (short of bearing children) and as males they are completely non-functional, requiring major surgery to become even partially functional males such as female-to-male sex changes can become. There are also rare functional hermaphrodites who, if not detected and assigned one sex through surgery soon after birth, can function more or less as either sex.

I tend to think that people who have sex changes are usually nuts, but reality is occasionally neither as linear nor as binary as we might wish. Sometimes people don't fit neatly into one or the other classification.
 
If it's illegal in the state, the only way to not get in trouble is to base your decision off their sex at birth.

"Show me your birth certificates please."

On that basis, I would have to deny.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top