So many misinformed here.....and I thought the board has some people with working brain cells. Guess I was wrong.
Indeed this is true.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_density
(energy per volume)
ethanol - 24 MJ/L
gasoline - 34.2 MJ/L (42% better than ethanol)
diesel - 37.3 MJ/L (9.3% better than gasoline)
First, your division is wrong. Using your figures, ethanol contains 70% of the energy that "pure" gasoline has. And you managed to leave out a more salient set of figures.....those of E10 gas.....posted on that same chart.
Gasoline...34.2MJ/L
E10 gasoline....33.18/L
That works out to E10 containing 97% of the energy that "pure" gasoline contains. Certainly not what most people think.
ethanol kills your mileage, thats why i only buy mobil or shell. it sucks because you can save a few cents a gallon at other gas stations, but its not worth it over the course of a tank. in my truck with 10% ethanol fuel im lucky to get 230 miles. with straight gas it gets 280-290.
Bullshit. Pure bullshit. There's no way E10 gas, which has 97% of the energy content that "pure" gas has could drop your mileage by 70 miles.....that's over a 20% reduction in mileage by your "figures." But that doesn't make a lick of sense if you actually think about it.
If you reduced your tank fill by 10% of "pure" gas per fillup, you'd expect a 10% reduction in range and mileage. If you get 280 miles per tank with a full tank, reducing your tank fill by 10% would give you a range reduction of 28 miles....giving you 252 miles.
But you're not reducing your tank fill by 10%, you're replacing 10% of your tank fill with ethanol which as 70% of the energy content that the rest of your tank has. And that E10 blend contains 97% of the energy content that "pure" gas contains, so you should be seeing at worst a 3% or so reduction in range and mileage. So, if you get 20mpg, you'd see a reduction to 19.4mpg at a 3% reduction, or negligible.
And remember, you're replacing approx. 13oz. of 128oz. of gas with a substance (ethanol) which produces a big dilution effect.
So, replacing 10% of your gas with ethanol, with its approx. 30% reduction of energy content, cannot drop mileage 20% or more.....just doesn't make sense at all if you use your brain and think about it rather than all the kneejerk reactions people tend to have about it.
It's called winter. Happens every year. Takes longer for the powertrain to warm up, more idle time (while scraping windows for example), and winter gas reformulation they always feel they have to screw around with for some stupid reason.
My Camaro would go from 28 to 25, the Trailblazer I have now went from 20 to 18.
Exactly. The ethanol addition has nothing to do with the summer/winter blends. Instead, the seasonal blending of gas has everything to do with evaporation of said gas.
The difference between conventional summer- and winter-blend gasoline has to do with the Reid Vapor Pressure of the fuel. RVP relates to the volatility of a gasoline. The more volatile a gasoline, the more likely it will evaporate as the temperatures rises; evaporated gasoline contributes to unhealthy ozone and smog levels. Summer gasoline has a low RVP and is less likely to evaporate when compared to the high RVP winter grade. The Environmental Protection Agency says conventional summer-blend gasoline contains 1.7 percent more energy than winter-blend gas, which contributes to the summer blend’s slightly better gas mileage.
And, as previously mentioned, winter also gives longer warmup times, which equals richer running times, consequently burning more gas during warmup cycles.
Ethanol has nothing to do with dramatic mileage decreases, and certainly cannot drop mileage by 25% as some have alluded to. Just cannot happen.