#Gamergate, the war on nerds, and the corruption of the left and the free press

Page 102 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Nebor

Lifer
Jun 24, 2003
29,582
12
76
Just by distilling this into a one side vs another side argument, you've revealed a lot. Thanks.

Your contributions to this thread have been invaluable as well. It's nice to see the thread has matured over the past 20 pages away from name calling and into a civil discussion between enlightened peers.

Probably because those fucking worthless SJWs stopped posting.
 

jackstar7

Lifer
Jun 26, 2009
11,679
1,944
126
Your contributions to this thread have been invaluable as well. It's nice to see the thread has matured over the past 20 pages away from name calling and into a civil discussion between enlightened peers.

Probably because those fucking worthless SJWs stopped posting.

Totes!
 

Blue_Max

Diamond Member
Jul 7, 2011
4,223
153
106
Your contributions to this thread have been invaluable as well. It's nice to see the thread has matured over the past 20 pages away from name calling and into a civil discussion between enlightened peers.

Probably because those fucking worthless SJWs stopped posting.

They're too busy lobbying for their turn as a U.N. speaker. :twisted:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23_h0RQ0Apg <- watch this one, this is the rare FULL footage of the UN talk in question.
hee hee... I LOVE how all the REAL women dealing with REAL issues basically just rolled their eyes and almost nodded off in complete disinterest. :awe:
So maybe there's hope for male/female interaction in the future... the SJW's are losing ground, not gaining it.
 
Last edited:

CitizenKain

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2000
4,480
14
76
One side, pro-GG, doesn't want speech curtailed, they want to weigh evidence and look at all angles of a subject. While the other wants to close off and effectively limit speech that they find incongruous with, or harmful to, their opinions. When conversation is restricted, despite whether it hurts your feelings or makes you uncomfortable, so is society as a whole.

Ahh yes, the movement started around threatening women is certainly the one that is all for hearing everyone's views.
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
Ahh yes, the movement started around threatening women is certainly the one that is all for hearing everyone's views.

I love that these people just keep repeating things in the hopes that will make them true.

Especially when it's someone like CitizenKain whose only input at these forums is to harass people.
 

Blue_Max

Diamond Member
Jul 7, 2011
4,223
153
106
Ahh yes, the movement started around threatening women is certainly the one that is all for hearing everyone's views.

Which side is issuing more threats?
Which side is mass-blocking?
Which side cries to authorities for opposing views to be blocked or deleted and the speaker silenced?
Which side went to the United Nations to cry "abuse" about people criticizing them?
[edit] OH! And which side has been proven to FAKE a number of those "threats" by using dupe accounts with the same IP address? (oopsie!)

Never mind... we're not going to get an objective answer, only religious zealotry.
 
Last edited:

MagickMan

Diamond Member
Aug 11, 2008
7,460
3
76
Ahh yes, the movement started around threatening women is certainly the one that is all for hearing everyone's views.

4 threatening tweets (that didn't even use the GG tag), from new egg accounts, out of >1000. Stop buying into the SJW bullshit.
 

jackstar7

Lifer
Jun 26, 2009
11,679
1,944
126
:rolleyes: Figured that was a waste of time but was willing to give you the benefit of the doubt. My mistake.

Don't you [get] satisfaction just pushing that out into the world? C'mon, it's okay to admit that you don't need me to actually have my mind changed by your lopsided rant.
 
Last edited:

CitizenKain

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2000
4,480
14
76
Which side is issuing more threats?
Which side is mass-blocking?
Which side cries to authorities for opposing views to be blocked or deleted and the speaker silenced?
Which side went to the United Nations to cry "abuse" about people criticizing them?
[edit] OH! And which side has been proven to FAKE a number of those "threats" by using dupe accounts with the same IP address? (oopsie!)

Never mind... we're not going to get an objective answer, only religious zealotry.

Its funny how uneducated trash like you equate blocking someone on twitter as just as bad as threatening to murder them.
 

MagickMan

Diamond Member
Aug 11, 2008
7,460
3
76
Don't you satisfaction just pushing that out into the world? C'mon, it's okay to admit that you don't need me to actually have my mind changed by your lopsided rant.

Interesting... could you try that again in English?
 

MongGrel

Lifer
Dec 3, 2013
38,466
3,067
121
I love that these people just keep repeating things in the hopes that will make them true.

Especially when it's someone like CitizenKain whose only input at these forums is to harass people.

It really appears to be your MO in most threads, other than outright abusive comments, and personal attacks.

Usually a combination of all three.

Have the feminists won in gamer land yet? I remember decades ago getting kicked out of a guild over some silly issue that had nothing to do with a person being female, and someone tried to make it look that way and several people rebuked his BS in the forums.

One of the best guilds I was ever in when I used to play MMO's was run by a Female CPA, she was cool.

And would laugh at this crap in general.
 
Last edited:

master_shake_

Diamond Member
May 22, 2012
6,425
292
121
irony...

zoe quinn who is against cyber-hate was part of the biggest cyber-hate community ever...

B8FiGk-CIAEjh-G.png:large
 

werepossum

Elite Member
Jul 10, 2006
29,873
463
126
Wait... so these platforms have to just allow everything? I'm pretty sure that's not constitutionally protected under the U.S. terms of service.

The persecution is the reals.
The side that argues no is also the side that is specifically supporting pedophiles. Hard for me to see any moral high ground beneath their chunky fake designer heels.

Which side is issuing more threats?
Which side is mass-blocking?
Which side cries to authorities for opposing views to be blocked or deleted and the speaker silenced?
Which side went to the United Nations to cry "abuse" about people criticizing them?
[edit] OH! And which side has been proven to FAKE a number of those "threats" by using dupe accounts with the same IP address? (oopsie!)

Never mind... we're not going to get an objective answer, only religious zealotry.
Isn't it weird that the UN is so strongly and almost uniformly against Western civilization principles even though the USA alone funds 20 - 25% of their costs?
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,935
55,287
136
I know, eh? It just *ruins* that whole 'perpetual victim' narrative, right?

:whiste:

The guy who claims to have been under relentless assault by feminists for most of his life is trying to call other people out for perpetual victimhood?

Dude, at least TRY to be the slightest bit self aware. Have you considered that you view yourself as a victim?
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
It really appears to be your MO in most threads, other than outright abusive comments, and personal attacks.

Usually a combination of all three.

Have the feminists won in gamer land yet? I remember decades ago getting kicked out of a guild over some silly issue that had nothing to do with a person being female, and someone tried to make it look that way and several people rebuked his BS in the forums.

One of the best guilds I was ever in when I used to play MMO's was run by a Female CPA, she was cool.

And would laugh at this crap in general.

You're obsessed with me. See a shrink.
 

Blue_Max

Diamond Member
Jul 7, 2011
4,223
153
106
You know both sides of this are playing victim just as hard, right?

They're not. Not even close. Might want to look up that whole #notyourshield thing...

The guy who claims to have been under relentless assault by feminists for most of his life is trying to call other people out for perpetual victimhood?

Dude, at least TRY to be the slightest bit self aware. Have you considered that you view yourself as a victim?

Again, not even close. Deliberate projection to try and take the correct label off the offender and stick it onto the person pointing it out. (Where the hell did you even come up with "assaulted by feminists most of his life" from anyway? Holy shit... that's brazen bullshit! But, hey, slander is no new territory for Anandtech SJW's.)

Here's a weird concept for you (that goes against your doctrine...) Pointing out someone's offenses does not mean you're a 'victim'.

One chooses to consider themselves a victim to gain sympathy, extra compassion, and gifts (tangible or otherwise.) This is why the femi-SJW crowd love, love, LOVE to consider themselves 'victims' at every possible opportunity. A victim gets patted on the head and given a lollipop while the white knights suit up to go kick the 'offenders' ass for her. Even if the truth is he hadn't done anything at all, she kicked him in the shins, then cried that she was a victim to have him re-punished by "the system". Pretty sweet deal for her.
he_for_she_car_bumper_sticker-rbf75b6d1aeec460581bba93f27739872_v9wht_8byvr_1200.jpg
 
Last edited: