#Gamergate, the war on nerds, and the corruption of the left and the free press

[fskimospy]

Except I get to deal with others who've experienced these same things.

The things you pretend "never happen" while your head is buried in your liberal-agenda sandbox.

South Park had a good episode of that...

So in other words, no. This is not surprising.

Someday I hope you can mature enough that you can ask yourself hard questions. Until then I guess you will continue blaming everyone but yourself. It's sad.

 

[Blue_Max]

So in other words, no. This is not surprising.

Someday I hope you can mature enough that you can ask yourself hard questions. Until then I guess you will continue blaming everyone but yourself. It's sad.

Your usual rhetoric... throw shit and hope it sticks.

http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/Woman-Charged-For-Attacking-Boyfriend-After-Being-Denied-Sex-303056581.html
I'm sure this never happened either. :whiste:

 

[Orignal Earl]

Once, I ignored.
This makes twice you've wrongly used this against me. You're insulting me AND slamming everyone on the autistic spectrum.

You're an asshole.
And you're wrong.

I don't care if you don't believe what I and others have experienced. I wonder what you'll say when it happens to you, since feminists usually turn on their male supporters when the time is right.

I am not insulting or slamming you. I am trying to empathize with you

Except I get to deal with others who've experienced these same things.

The things you pretend "never happen" while your head is buried in your liberal-agenda sandbox.

It is common for people with mental disabilities to "get stuck" on message boards etc, and feed off each other

 

[mindmajick]

Your usual rhetoric... throw shit and hope it sticks.

http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/loca...yfriend-After-Being-Denied-Sex-303056581.html
I'm sure this never happened either. :whiste:

I'm sure elliott rodger would agree with everything you've said.

No one here says women don't commit violence towards men, but statistically men commit many more acts of violence towards women.

I've yet to meet a "men's rights activist" that believes in equality. They usually believe the "male masters" should be back in their "rightful place" on top of the food chain.

Edit: I've been seeing more and more xenophobia in our society over the years and it truly disturbs me. Women are "other", ethnic groups are "other".. Jiminy christmas! Were all human beings and are much more alike than different. The people who hate "victim mentality" are always victims of the atheist and the gay and the woman and the ethnic.. Smh.

 

[Blue_Max]

I'm sure elliott rodger would agree with everything you've said.

No one here says women don't commit violence towards men, but statistically men commit many more acts of violence towards women.

I've yet to meet a "men's rights activist" that believes in equality. They usually believe the "male masters" should be back in their "rightful place" on top of the food chain.

Edit: I've been seeing more and more xenophobia in our society over the years and it truly disturbs me. Women are "other", ethnic groups are "other".. Jiminy christmas! Were all human beings and are much more alike than different. The people who hate "victim mentality" are always victims of the atheist and the gay and the woman and the ethnic.. Smh.

Actually, men do NOT "commit many more acts of violence towards women" as feminists love to lie (much like the wage gap lie.)
Government stats prove it: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/85f0033m/2010024/part-partie1-eng.htm

I'm not into MRM so I can't comment on what any of them are saying, but many of us single dads just want to see our kids in a system that is so heavily female-favouring it'll make your head spin. If you're stupid enough to date in this crazy world, bring your own condoms because getting pregnant is a big financial plan for a lot of women today. Free money from some sucker AND the government = the new "stability plan". And no, you're unlikely to get any real time with the children you sire if she wants you (not your money) out of her life.

1-4 hours a month is still considered "parenting time" and qualifies under "shared parenting" instead of "sole guardianship".

Tell me that's "equality".

 

[Orignal Earl]

Actually, men do NOT "commit many more acts of violence towards women" as feminists love to lie (much like the wage gap lie.)
Government stats prove it: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/85f0033m/2010024/part-partie1-eng.htm

I'm not into MRM so I can't comment on what any of them are saying, but many of us single dads just want to see our kids in a system that is so heavily female-favouring it'll make your head spin. If you're stupid enough to date in this crazy world, bring your own condoms because getting pregnant is a big financial plan for a lot of women today. Free money from some sucker AND the government = the new "stability plan". And no, you're unlikely to get any real time with the children you sire if she wants you (not your money) out of her life.

1-4 hours a month is still considered "parenting time" and qualifies under "shared parenting" instead of "sole guardianship".

Tell me that's "equality".

Are you Canadian?

I've had 3 kids with 3 different mothers and would get my kids for 3 days a week after the breakups.
I would of been considered the worse of the parents because of my admitted drinking problem in the 2 cases that went through the court system.
In the end, after I "fixed" myself, everything worked out great
If you only got 1-4 hrs a month there is something your not mentioning

 

[UglyCasanova]

Actually, men do NOT "commit many more acts of violence towards women" as feminists love to lie (much like the wage gap lie.)
Government stats prove it: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/85f0033m/2010024/part-partie1-eng.htm

I'm not into MRM so I can't comment on what any of them are saying, but many of us single dads just want to see our kids in a system that is so heavily female-favouring it'll make your head spin. If you're stupid enough to date in this crazy world, bring your own condoms because getting pregnant is a big financial plan for a lot of women today. Free money from some sucker AND the government = the new "stability plan". And no, you're unlikely to get any real time with the children you sire if she wants you (not your money) out of her life.

1-4 hours a month is still considered "parenting time" and qualifies under "shared parenting" instead of "sole guardianship".

Tell me that's "equality".

I agree that the system is stacked in favor of women when it comes to child rearing after a divorce, but to be honest that isn't necessarily a bad thing. Ideally the kid has both parents, but I do feel in more instances than not a mother does provide things that many dads don't.

And this is coming from a single dad raising my two kids by myself.

 

[Blue_Max]

Are you Canadian?

I've had 3 kids with 3 different mothers and would get my kids for 3 days a week after the breakups.
I would of been considered the worse of the parents because of my admitted drinking problem in the 2 cases that went through the court system.
In the end, after I "fixed" myself, everything worked out great
If you only got 1-4 hrs a month there is something your not mentioning

I'm not the one getting ~4hrs (nice insult-shot there, by the way, insinuating I'm a criminal bastard, etc.) and how lucky for you that none of your three baby-mommas are actively preventing access. All they have to do is say "no" and ignore any court orders and you've got a battle royale on your hands to get any access at all. The odds are very low that you actually have *three* VERY cooperative baby-mommas.

...and easily $1200/mo in child support payments. Ouch.

 

[mindmajick]

Actually, men do NOT "commit many more acts of violence towards women" as feminists love to lie (much like the wage gap lie.)
Government stats prove it: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/85f0033m/2010024/part-partie1-eng.htm

I'm not into MRM so I can't comment on what any of them are saying, but many of us single dads just want to see our kids in a system that is so heavily female-favouring it'll make your head spin. If you're stupid enough to date in this crazy world, bring your own condoms because getting pregnant is a big financial plan for a lot of women today. Free money from some sucker AND the government = the new "stability plan". And no, you're unlikely to get any real time with the children you sire if she wants you (not your money) out of her life.

1-4 hours a month is still considered "parenting time" and qualifies under "shared parenting" instead of "sole guardianship".

Tell me that's "equality".

I'll address your statistics when you provide them from the US (where i believe you live, but could be wrong)

Wage gap: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tan...ng-you-need-to-know-about-the-gender-pay-gap/

I'm not sure about the quality of person you married, but your view of women in general is obviously skewed by one personal relationship. I can tell you- the woman i married is nothing like the one you chose to marry. But I've also been careful about birth control as well. I definitely don't expect her to take all the responsibility.

I do know a number of people who work with the Courts on cases like yours. If you can't see your kids there's a GOOD reason.

My brothers ex wife accused him of every disgusting thing in the book and guess what? He gets his kids whenever he wants. He showed he was a responsible parent.

 

[Blue_Max]

I agree that the system is stacked in favor of women when it comes to child rearing after a divorce, but to be honest that isn't necessarily a bad thing. Ideally the kid has both parents, but I do feel in more instances than not a mother does provide things that many dads don't.

And this is coming from a single dad raising my two kids by myself.

Heh... check the statistics of our prison system and how many inmates come from single-mom homes.
Way to go, single-mom "we don't need men" feminists, on utterly failing to raise your kids at all.

In divorce, most kids barely ever see their dads again and most of the time it's because momma' keeping him away.

 

[Orignal Earl]

I'm not the one getting ~4hrs (nice insult-shot there, by the way, insinuating I'm a criminal bastard, etc.) and how lucky for you that none of your three baby-mommas are actively preventing access. All they have to do is say "no" and ignore any court orders and you've got a battle royale on your hands to get any access at all. The odds are very low that you actually have *three* VERY cooperative baby-mommas.

...and easily $1200/mo in child support payments. Ouch.

My kids are all adults now, and I'm a very happy grandfather
Yes, I had child support payments and I paid them them and now I'm reaping the rewards of doing so
I'm not insulting you, and your insults don't bother me

 

[mindmajick]

Of course... If hes from canada or us makes a big diff. Two different systems

 

[Orignal Earl]

Of course... If hes from canada or us makes a big diff. Two different systems

How so?

 

[Blue_Max]

I'll address your statistics when you provide them from the US (where i believe you live, but could be wrong)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58arQIr882w
http://time.com/3222543/5-feminist-myths-that-will-not-die/

My brothers ex wife accused him of every disgusting thing in the book and guess what? He gets his kids whenever he wants. He showed he was a responsible parent.

Well he won the lottery then, since many women would prevent such access. The courts may grant it (they did for me, too) but many moms will resist that because it's very easy to do.

 

[mindmajick]

How so?

Well. His statistics for gender violence are correct for canada and incorrect for the US.

IN regards to the canadian legal system.. I know NOTHING about it. I know the US system USED TO work the way he describes but things have changed over the years.

No longer does the woman get default rights over men. But also, states communicate now and men can't run from their responsibilities anymore either.

 

[Blue_Max]

Well. His statistics for gender violence are correct for canada and incorrect for the US.

IN regards to the canadian legal system.. I know NOTHING about it. I know the US system USED TO work the way he describes but things have changed over the years.

No longer does the woman get default rights over men. But also, states communicate now and men can't run from their responsibilities anymore either.

If you want a great documentary on the US system specifically, watch the movie "Divorce Corp." http://www.divorcecorp.com/

Edit: Sorry... was still on the kids thought-track, not digging up USA gender violence stats for you.

 

[Orignal Earl]

Well. His statistics for gender violence are correct for canada and incorrect for the US.

IN regards to the canadian legal system.. I know NOTHING about it. I know the US system USED TO work the way he describes but things have changed over the years.

No longer does the woman get default rights over men. But also, states communicate now and men can't run from their responsibilities anymore either.

Ah ok, and really the stats should be world wide to get a proper perspective

 

[UglyCasanova]

Heh... check the statistics of our prison system and how many inmates come from single-mom homes.
Way to go, single-mom "we don't need men" feminists, on utterly failing to raise your kids at all.

In divorce, most kids barely ever see their dads again and most of the time it's because momma' keeping him away.

Holy cow, nothing but rage and paranoia. I never said kids being raised by single moms was the best solution. Kids being raised by two engaged parents is by far the best for the kids.

And if they barely ever see their dads, most of the time it's the dads damned fault. I know there are all sorts of unique situations out there, some of which I'm sure are wrong and unfair, but if the dad hasn't done anything to show that he is not a good parent (domestic violence, substance abuse, etc) then it is his responsibility to not just have visitation but actually co parent and follow through with it. The mistake is thinking it will be easy, being a parent is tough even when there is a good partner there to help. Being a single parent with no help is really tough, I should know.

 

[mindmajick]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58arQIr882w
http://time.com/3222543/5-feminist-myths-that-will-not-die/


Well he won the lottery then, since many women would prevent such access. The courts may grant it (they did for me, too) but many moms will resist that because it's very easy to do.

Oh she tried. But he had the legal higher ground. Easily won by showing that he was the MORE active parent in the kids lives.

there is nothing she can do.. No lies that can be told... That will stand up in a court. All you need is to have your ducks in a row.

 

[mindmajick]

Ah ok, and really the stats should be world wide to get a proper perspective

True.

 

[fskimospy]

Actually, men do NOT "commit many more acts of violence towards women" as feminists love to lie (much like the wage gap lie.)
Government stats prove it: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/85f0033m/2010024/part-partie1-eng.htm

I'm not into MRM so I can't comment on what any of them are saying, but many of us single dads just want to see our kids in a system that is so heavily female-favouring it'll make your head spin. If you're stupid enough to date in this crazy world, bring your own condoms because getting pregnant is a big financial plan for a lot of women today. Free money from some sucker AND the government = the new "stability plan". And no, you're unlikely to get any real time with the children you sire if she wants you (not your money) out of her life.

1-4 hours a month is still considered "parenting time" and qualifies under "shared parenting" instead of "sole guardianship".

Tell me that's "equality".

Did you read your own link?

Profile of the accused
In general, women most often reported being victimized by men regardless of crime type, and this was the case as well for male victims. Men were considered the accused in 81% of cases of violent victimization against women, and in 79% of cases of violent victimization against males; whereas females accounted for 10% of victimizations against females and 10% against males. These findings are supported by results from other studies in the United States, where the majority of perpetrators that came to the attention of the criminal justice system were men (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2006; Heimer and Lauritsen, 2008; U.S. Department of Justice, 2009).

Nice self ownage there, btw.

 

[Orignal Earl]

Nice self ownage there, btw.

Everything he is posting here is showing the system is working just fine

 

[CitizenKain]

Eat shit, SJW. There's no one in the whole fucking world more dishonest than you white knight bitches. Go crawl back under your masters' skirts.

You truly are a stupid asshole, and a whiny little baby. Typical for a gamergater though.

 

[MagickMan]

You truly are a stupid asshole, and a whiny little baby. Typical for a gamergater though.

Go fuck yourself, mangina.

 

[MagickMan]

Stupid question.. but did any of that "favorable treatment" mount to shit sales wise? Far as I've ever seen they're stuff still didn't sell for shit. If it didn't one has to wonder what's the point? I'm still not even sure what "favorable treatment" they received, other than a bunch of kickstarter donations. (for the record I few kickstarter donations like GoFundMe donations. If idiots want to waste their money it doesn't effect my world whatsoever.)

It amounted to grants and support going to them instead of more qualified, talented developers. They're parasites, nothing more.

Seriously, just stop.

Listen and Believe! HAHAHAHA!!!