blake0812
Senior member
- Feb 6, 2014
- 788
- 4
- 81
Simple: It's not.Holy shit. Just wow.
This is just total bullshit. How could you even make this shit up.
Simple: It's not.Holy shit. Just wow.
This is just total bullshit. How could you even make this shit up.
I have no problem with women playing video games at all. I certainly wouldn't have a problem if it were 100% women.
I'm glad you brought that up, this is something alot of people don't seem to know. The one that cried victim the most was the one that helped drive two people to suicide.
daily dump
Insane Ramblings
Since the OP is using this as a place to post insane stupid bullshit that literally no single human being on Earth cares about, let me piggyback. excessive profanity deleted
Stop thread crapping, I for one like the GG updates. Note:
P&N's posting guidelines, which serve to supplement the AnandTech Forum posting rules, are as follows:1. No thread-crapping, thread-derailment, off-topic posting, trolling, the intentional posting of logical fallacies or misinformation.
Hasnt this nonsense died yet?
This thread is more painful than waiting for HL3 to come out![]()
Do you even math bro? 100% of gamers being women means no men game whatsoever. I can understand how, as a non-gamer, you'd be ok with that.
It doesn't even make sense economically. It would destroy most of the games industry overnight, but then you don't game so you don't care.
So you're fine with destroying most of an industry because men are involved with the production and consumption of said product?
Hasnt this nonsense died yet?
This thread is more painful than waiting for HL3 to come out![]()
Report something or stop whining...
But we also have the privilege to call the OP an idiot.
...just as others have to right to call you one
Anyway, I don't think your example really works, because you would still be performing the same malignant deed: classifying an entire group of people with "evidence" (sometimes just from word of mouth) formulated by a small subset. For example, if you were to say "After the recent ruling, it's apparent that all people in Alabama are homophobes",
I obviously disagree with your assessment of my analogy and if I were to say "After the recent ruling, it's apparent that all people in Alabama are homophobes" I'd be making a stupid conclusion...
My conclusion based on some court rulings in the South about that issue is that there seems to be a lot of Homophobic asshats there.
....
Try living in the South, rather than looking at some court rulings. It'll change your perspective on things.